Channel
@frostpickapp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
250subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002079894080 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @frostpickapp |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/frostpickapp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:26 | 250 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 252 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 252 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 June 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 39 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
FCSB – FC Botosani, Liga I. Statystyki: obie drużyny strzeliły w 7 z ostatnich 10 spotkań, a 5 z ostatnich 6 bezpośrednich starć zakończyło się golami po obu stronach. FCSB traci średnio 1.9 gola na mecz, Botosani tyle samo. Pełna analiza: frostpick.app
Obie połowy ładnie weszły, mi sie udało wyłapać 2.00 ale na spokojnie dało się i większy ;)
Ciekawy meczyk do obserwacji ;)
Przed meczem: Argentyna z serią 10/10 goli do przerwy, Anglia 7/10. Dziś do przerwy było 0-0 — seria pękła. Dane nie zawsze się sprawdzają, dlatego pokazujemy je bez owijania. Sprawdź sam: frostpick.app
Argentyna strzeliła gola w pierwszej połowie w 10 z ostatnich 10 meczów. Anglia — w 7 z 10. Łączna średnia obu drużyn wychodzi identyczna, ale rozkład jest zupełnie inny. Sam sprawdź dane: frostpick.app
Photo, posted without a caption
Fram Reykjavik strzelił 25 bramek w 9 meczach tego sezonu, Keflavik stracił 18 w tej samej liczbie spotkań. W historii bezpośrednich starć Keflavik prowadzi 13-7-3, ale żadne z ostatnich 3 spotkań nie zakończyło się remisem. Dwie różne historie przed dzisiejszym meczem. frostpick.app
Mimo że naszym celem nie jest dawanie gotowych typów, a podanie ciekawych meczy do analizy i odpowiednich statystyk, fajnie widzieć jak wchodzi to co pokazaliśmy 🤪 Pamiętajcie o tym że możecie testować naszą analizę także za darmo😁
Brazylia vs Norwegia na Mundialu, dane BTTS z ostatnich 10 meczów obu zespołów wyglądają zaskakująco spójnie po obu stronach boiska. Warto rzucić okiem przed startem meczu, zanim wyciągniesz własne wnioski. frostpick.app
Photo, posted without a caption
Przed meczem Sirius – Mjällby pokazaliśmy na tiktoku sygnał Over 2.5 jako najmocniejszy. Wynik końcowy: 4:4, osiem goli, Sirius stracił prowadzenie 4:2 w doliczonym czasie. Dane były widoczne zanim mecz się zaczął. frostpick.app
Qingdao Youth Island – Shanghai Port o 13:00. Ostatnie 5 bezpośrednich starć: w każdym obie drużyny strzeliły gola, średnio 5.2 gola na mecz. Shanghai Port ma to w 75% meczów w tym sezonie. Dokładna analiza
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @frostpickapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FrostPick” (@frostpickapp), 250 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frostpickapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.