Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Front Ed x IT-ХОЗЯЕВА

@fronted_engineer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

119subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002419730509
TypeChannel
Username@fronted_engineer
Description< Fullstack Developer • TeamLead • Mentor /> Telegram: t.me/ra1n_xd Twitch: twitch.tv/fronted_ra1n Обо мне: ra1n-xd.github.io/portfolio
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/fronted_engineer

Growth

1196 August 2026 — 119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 119 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118–120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:17119no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:02119first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 9 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.4%
avg views ÷ 119 subscribers
Avg views / post
60.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held12 (9 April 202631 July 2026)
Views total60
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
72
Videos
1
Links
38

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1826.9%
🥰1826.9%
👍1420.9%
💯57.46%
❤‍🔥34.48%
🔥34.48%
😎34.48%
🍌22.99%
🤯11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Вся суть нейронок - подлизывать пользователю. 🧠 А если серьезно, то хотел бы поднять тему изменений майндсета в эпоху нейронок. Я сейчас почти всё делаю при помощи нейронок. Но даже будучи в теме, иногда действую по старым привычкам. Недавно на моем китайском ноуте вылез баг. Я полез на 4PDA и начал искать решение по ключевым словам. Через пару минут понял, что можно просто скормить ЧатуГПТ ссылку на топик, и он

💯1🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC147 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😇 Вышла запись моего доклада на тему "Хватит сливать токены! Базовая гигиена для экономии лимитов ИИ-агентов" на YouTube канале IT-ХОЗЯЕВА ❤️ https://youtu.be/XQ9E-r7i0oE

3

10 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC168 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💪 OpenAI выкатили GPT-5.6 В линейке три модели: • Luna для быстрых и простых задач. • Terra для повседневной разработки и задач средней сложности. • Sol для сложного кода, архитектуры, рефакторинга и поиска багов. Толком протестировать ещё не успел, но пока нравится. В простой задаче GPT-5.5 X-High допустила баг, а Sol X-High, хоть и работала дольше, выполнила всё без ошибок. Почитал чаты, многие в восторге от So

1👍1

20 Jun 2026, 09:18 UTC≈2,800 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

👍 Хватит сливать токены! Базовая гигиена для экономии лимитов ИИ-агентов Пройдемся по базе и обсудим, как в Claude Code, Codex и других агентах экономить токены, меньше засорять контекст, какие инструменты использовать, и в каких ситуациях. 🟢 Сегодня (20.06.26) в 20:00, в сообществе IT-ХОЗЯЕВА.

❤‍🔥3🥰3💯1🤯1

9 Jun 2026, 18:39 UTC323 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

👍 Вышел Fable/Mythos 5, но с подвохом. В подписке модель доступна только до 22 июня, дальше только за кредиты. API по цене $10/$50 за миллион токенов. Продолжаю сидеть на Кодексе 😁😁😁

😎3

28 May 2026, 18:18 UTC≈3,020 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🧡 Всех с новым Опусом По бенчам как будто можно дальше сидеть на 4.7 или даже 4.6. Но там на практике гляем что и как будет, но пока как будто хайп новых платных моделей все ниже и ниже. Зато опенсорс все вкуснее и вкуснее становяться.

2👍1

15 May 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,320 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😇 Итоги HolyJS 2026 Spring 😇 Доклады понравились, что-то для себя подчеркнул, часть докладов посмотрю потом в записи. Но больше всего, как обычно, зарядила сама атмосфера - новых знакомств в этот раз получилось даже больше, чем на прошлом HolyJS. Очень рад, что наконец-то встретился с "IT-ХОЗЯЕВА" вживую. Ну и благодаря данной конфе я добил 100 подписчиков, всем спасибо ❤️ ПИВО 😀

🥰157👍6🔥2

10 May 2026, 07:01 UTC472 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Синдром "дурачка" при обучении Помогая новичкам, я в очередной раз вижу одну наболевшую проблему: с детства нам вбивают, что сначала нужно изучить теорию, а потом уже идти в бой. Проблема в том, что в разработке за любым действием можно спуститься до уровня ассемблера, потом до устройства процессора, потом до физики - и на это не хватит всей жизни. И это касается любой сферы: повар не знает всей химии при готовк

👍4💯32🍌2

30 Apr 2026, 14:43 UTC352 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😇 Мнение о GPT-5.5 как инструмента для рядовой разработки Потестил GPT-5.5 High и Claude Opus 4.7 High на своих задачах. В целом Codex и Claude часто показывали плюс-минус одинаковые результаты, но в отдельных кейсах Codex заметно лидировал. Самый показательный пример: в интерфейсе неожиданно сломалось отображение одного визуального элемента. На первый взгляд казалось, что проблема в логике UI, но причина оказалась

1

26 Apr 2026, 19:43 UTC348 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Claude vs ChatGPT Но все было не зря, я провёл месяц тестирования Claude и ChatGPT в своих задачах: код, обучение, тексты, генерация картинок и повседневные вопросы. По итогу для меня Claude выигрывает почти везде. Но основным ИИ всё равно сделал ChatGPT, а Claude оставил как вспомогательный, только понизил подписку со 100 баксов до 20. Не стал делать огромный пост, поэтому кому интересно, то в комментариях смот

1👍1

20 Apr 2026, 10:50 UTC308 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🧠 Бесполезные знания про ИИ Ловлю себя на том, что вместо своих проектов гоняю одни и те же задачки в Codex и Claude, хотя оба справляются. Или залипаю в ленте: новая моделька - посмотрел, новый инструмент - потыкал. А ведь большинство из этого умрёт или мутирует до неузнаваемости за пару месяцев. Какой смысл тратить время на ресерч того, что скоро будет неактуально. 🛠 Немного разгребаю через NotebookLM - кидаю туд

1👍1

9 Apr 2026, 06:24 UTC317 viewsread 9 August 2026

🤡 Опа опа, опять уязвимости. Обновляемся реябики https://vercel.com/changelog/summary-of-cve-2026-23869

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @fronted_engineer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 971,271 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Front Ed x IT-ХОЗЯЕВА” (@fronted_engineer), 119 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fronted_engineer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.