29 Jan 2025, 18:31 UTC770 viewsread 6 August 2026
Личное мнение и не финансовый совет, конечно же! Просто мотайте на ус и эти варианты тоже учитывайте при планировании своих финансов.
Channel
От 1 до 200 ETH
@from1to200eth
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
425subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001433507210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @from1to200eth |
| Description | Эксперимент: реально ли каждому участнику канала пройти путь до 200 ETH в своём кошельке. Разберёмся и посмотрим, что делало людей богатыми в крипте и можно ли это повторить. Для связи: @tvoyplusbot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/from1to200eth |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 425 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 425 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 213
- Videos
- 12
- Links
- 606
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
29 Jan 2025, 18:29 UTC767 viewsread 6 August 2026
Таким образом, господин Трамп с наименьшим сопротивлением соберёт государственный резерв в BTC, который ему так нужен. А еще интереснее, если он с помощью этих всех нехитрых манипуляций сможет сделать невозможное: предпринять попытку обнулить госдолг США. И все это будет феноменально по красоте. Господин Трамп - хороший бизнесмен, а каждый бизнес - это немного безумство, немного афера. Все в его стиле.
29 Jan 2025, 18:29 UTC760 viewsread 6 August 2026
Да, можно сказать, что эти распрекрасные мем-коины просто будут идти ценником вниз, пока совершенно не обесценятся. Такой вариант вполне себе по моему личному мнению возможен. Однако, есть еще варианты. Это, конечно, тоже мое личное мнение и ни в коем случае не финансовый совет, но, что вы скажете, если господин Трамп с помощью этих своих двух токенов всосёт в себя весь криптовалютный рынок? В этом случае TRUMP и ME…
29 Jan 2025, 18:28 UTC701 viewsread 6 August 2026
Неделька уложилась в пару дней, время летит. Итак, давайте обсудим моё личное мнение. О TRUMP и MELANIA. О чем же оно?
29 Jan 2025, 18:28 UTC696 viewsread 6 August 2026
Всем добра!
21 Jan 2025, 20:07 UTC711 viewsread 6 August 2026
Что я в течение 1-2 дней как раз и сделаю. Прямо в общем доступе 😎
21 Jan 2025, 20:07 UTC704 viewsread 6 August 2026
Значит стоит поделиться мнением по второму и третьему вариантам.
21 Jan 2025, 20:06 UTC700 viewsread 6 August 2026
У меня было три варианта развития событий. Первый - это падение в ноль сразу после инаугурации. Но, вот, мы видим, что этого не произошло.
21 Jan 2025, 20:04 UTC699 viewsread 6 August 2026
Спрашивают меня про TRUMP и MELANIA.
21 Jan 2025, 20:00 UTC683 viewsread 6 August 2026
Всем добра!
19 Jan 2025, 10:21 UTC670 viewsread 6 August 2026
Всем добра!
19 Jan 2025, 10:21 UTC667 viewsread 6 August 2026
Что ж.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @from1to200eth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,107,045 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“От 1 до 200 ETH” (@from1to200eth), 425 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/from1to200eth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.