Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Fringe Politics Hub

@fringehub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

152subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003717988273
TypeChannel
Username@fringehub
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 5 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fringehub

Growth

1341521436 August 2026 — 134 subscribers6 August 2026 — 137 subscribers8 August 2026 — 137 subscribers13 August 2026 — 152 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–155 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:57152+15
8 Aug 2026, 23:16137no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:02137+3
6 Aug 2026, 07:19134first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
228.0%
avg views ÷ 152 subscribers
Avg views / post
347
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (5 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,506
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

178 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5530.9%
4927.5%
👍2614.6%
💘2212.4%
🥰95.06%
52.81%
😱52.81%
🌚21.12%
👏21.12%
💊21.12%
custom 539098125702900154910.562%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fringehub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Франция славится своей левой традицией в кинематографе. Её канон составляет древнейший авторитетный журнал Кайе дю синема, кино новой волны(Годар и ко) и группа левого берега(Ален Рене, Аньес Варда). Однако у истоков таких праздных занятий как литература, философия и музыка стоят люди с не очень прогрессивными взглядами. И кинематограф в этом плане не исключение. Отцы-основатели кинематографа Луи и Огюст Люмьеры хоро

5

6 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC601 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Одним из моих гилти плэжэ является чтение эзотерической литературы. В этом году топ 1 в этой категории занимает Тао Лин. А в прошлом – "Восхождение на гору Хермон" известного русского кроулианца Олега Телемского. У Олега было непростое детство. Из-за многочисленных невзгод он озлобился на весь мир. И в порыве злобы проклял свою бабушку(!) из-за квартирного вопроса. Думаю, если бы Сологуб писал Мелкого беса сегодня,

4🌚2

5 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC629 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вчера в госдуме анонсировали ужесточение контроля видеоигр после выборов. Влияние игр на детей и взрослых тема старая и не очень интересная. Однако я хочу отметить пару любопытный моментов. В своё время я много играл в мультиплеер второго старкрафта и следил за его про-сценой. Старкрафт это стратегия в реальном время, в которой ты играешь за одну из трёх рас. Геймплей за каждую расу кардинально отличается. Кроме тог

👍75

4 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC693 viewsread 8 August 2026

Хотя был человек, которому удалось создать временную автономную зону на острове. Более того, он даже реализовал некоторые потайные желания Хаким Бея. Это Эпштейн. Возможно, его мотивы были и у Питера Тиля, и у Пэтри Фридмана, и у Хаким Бея. Они просто предпочли их скрыть за идеологией.

4 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC687 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Расовый реалист Варол в разговоре с Коди Уилсоном хвалит его деловую хватку. Когда речь заходит про инициативных ребят из кругов Питеря Тиля, Коди вспоминает активиста Пэтри Фридмана. Фридман задумал проект так называемого систейдинга. Проект предполагал создание автономных сообществ, которые бы проживали на плавучих островах в международных водах. Дело в том, что там не распространяются законы государств. И можно с

9

2 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC184 views14 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

Доделал! Час проходила проверка на "соблюдение правил сообщества". Думал, не пройдет. Каналы организаций Коди банили раньше на ютубе. Криптоанархисты есть в чате?)

🥰93👏1😱1

30 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC215 views21 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026

Ура! Нас больше тысячи на ютубе! Запомнил всех первых, вы мой отряд из Фив! В планах помимо роликов проводить тематические стримы. Так что будет весело и интересно. P.S. A? большое спасибо за звёзды!

🔥21

28 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC219 views19 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026

За последний месяц больше 30% трафика на ютубе из США. Я давно заметил, что ютуб перевёл на английский и озвучил мои ролики, но только сейчас их прослушал. И офигел. Перевод близок к идеалу, а с интонациями ИИ справляется лучше чем я. Нет, серьёзно, я думаю, если дать прослушать отрывок моей читки и читки ИИ случайным людям, кто-то может подумать, что мой голос – это голос ИИ, а голос ИИ человеческий. В общем, полный

18👏1

27 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC236 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Обложки русских изданий Войны. Первую обложку украшает картина немецкого художника Отто Дикса. В фашистской Германии его картины считали дегенеративным искусством. Селин пренебрежительно относился к немцам. Впрочем, как и почти ко всем людям. Но никогда открыто это не показывал. Он использовал свою репутацию культурного француза и врача, чтобы получить максимум привилегий у заискивающих бошей.

5💘2

24 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC210 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В 1944 году Луи-Фердинанд Селин бежал вместе с женой из Парижа. Он опасался последствий за сотрудничество с коллаборационистским режимом Виши. В парижской квартире Селин оставил архив своих рукописей, среди которых было 3 неопубликованных романа. В 2021 году этот архив неожиданно нашёлся. Его передал аноним французскому журналисту и театральному критику Жану-Пьеру Тибоду. В России самым известным переводчиком Селина

💘7

23 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC224 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В книге The Last Men: Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity Ren помимо прочего пишет про американского предпринимателя-биохакера Брайана Джонсона. Того самого, который недавно заболел аутоиммунным гастритом. Джонсон утверждает, что тратит два миллиона в год на поддержание здоровья. В качестве эксперимента он пробовал переливать себе плазму крови своего 17-летнего сына. Но особых результатов это не дало. Джонсон пр

💘4💊21

21 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC254 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почитал комментарии на ютубе. Насчёт использования ИИ. В этот раз в тексте было много цитат. Из книг Ren'а, из работы Шарашкина, из статей про тестостерон и глютен. И, естественно, там употребляются не разговорные обороты. Можно было их сократить или перефразировать. Но я решил оставить. Не думал, что это так будет резать слух. Еще больше режет слух, как я понял, голос. "Голос уставшего двачера"🙂. Да, с голосом тяжел

🔥16

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fringehub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 113,645 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fringe Politics Hub” (@fringehub), 152 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fringehub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.