Channel
@friedensprozess
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
130subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002272642839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @friedensprozess |
| Description | Mut zur Veränderung ohne Aggression |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/friedensprozess |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 130 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 130 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 129 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 22.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DEGENERATION. Ein Mensch, dessen Urteilskraft verkümmert, ist ein guter Kunde. Er kauft, was man ihm zeigt. Er glaubt, was man ihm sagt. Er empört sich, wo man ihn hinlenkt. Verkümmerung ist kein Nebeneffekt dieses Systems. Sie ist sein Geschäftsmodell. Der Weg zurück braucht keine Revolution. Er braucht Reibung. Eine Frage selbst durchdenken statt Chatgpt oder Opus. Eine Meinung prüfen statt sie übernehmen. Jede e…
👍3
https://youtu.be/yHkz5TSf02s 👉 Abonniere Friedlicher Wandel https://t.me/friedensprozess
KNECHTSCHAFT. Freiwillig getragen, schmeckt sie nach Stolz. Du verteidigst die Mauern deiner Zelle und nennst es Realismus. Wer den Käfig liebt, bewacht ihn umsonst. 👉 Abonniere Friedlicher Wandel https://t.me/friedensprozess
👍7
Du bist nicht das Opfer des Systems - du bist sein Kraftwerk.
👍2
Jiang Xueqin über Aufmerksamkeit 👉 Abonniere Friedlicher Wandel https://t.me/friedensprozess
BOTTLE NECK. Jedes System hat einen Engpass. Auch das System das dich kontrolliert. Es nennt sich Aufmerksamkeit.Wer sie besitzt, besitzt dich. Nachrichten. Algorithmen. Empörung. Alles designed für einen einzigen Punkt: deinen Fokus. Solange du nicht weißt wo dein Engpass ist, managen ihn andere. 👉 Abonniere Friedlicher Wandel https://t.me/friedensproze
👍2
SYSTEMWECHSEL. Gerade jetzt — während alte Narrative auseinanderfallen und neue gebaut werden — öffnet sich ein Fenster. Nicht für Panik. Für Klarheit. Wer mitten im Wandel begreift, dass Narrative immer gebaut wurden — von jemandem, für jemanden — der kann zum ersten Mal fragen: Welches Narrativ dient mir? Welches dient jemand anderem? Das ist keine philosophische Übung. Das ist der Moment wo Einstellungsarbeit …
👍2
DAS GOLDENE KALB NAMENS DEMOKRATIE mit Michael Werner, Ben Richter, Jan A. Karon und Peter Müller #FairTalk #AufAugenhöhe 👉🏻 auf YouTube ansehen 👉🏻 unterwegs anhören
WAHRHEIT. Du erkennst sie nicht, weil du nie gelernt hast, wie man sie findet. Das Trivium ist uralt. Grammatik, Logik, Rhetorik. Erst sammelst du das Wissen — was ist überhaupt da? Dann prüfst du es — passt es zusammen oder widerspricht es sich? Erst dann sprichst du — und kannst nicht mehr manipuliert werden. Drei Schritte. Die Reihenfolge ist alles. Heute lernst du es umgekehrt. Du bekommst fertige Meinungen, …
URSACHE. Hermetik sagt: Jeder Gedanke ist eine Ursache. Jede Situation in deinem Leben ist eine Wirkung. Das klingt abstrakt, bis du es auf dich anwendest. Solange du glaubst, dass das Leben mit dir passiert, bist du Wirkung. Reagierst. Wartest. Leidest an Umständen die sich anfühlen als kämen sie von außen. Aber Umstände kommen nicht einfach. Sie sind Wirkung von der Einstellung dahinter. Wer das erkennt, hört a…
👍3
Was du glaubst, siehst du. Was du siehst, bestätigt, was du glaubst.
👍3
Mark Passio "Shadow Work Seminar" https://youtu.be/Iouo8LQKoLQ?t=9735 👉 Abonniere Friedlicher Wandel https://t.me/friedensprozess
❤4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @friedensprozess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@friedensprozess named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Friedlicher Wandel” (@friedensprozess), 130 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/friedensprozess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.