Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Frieden und Freiheit für die ganze Welt

@frieden_Peace

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

157subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001195589898
TypeChannel
Username@frieden_Peace
DescriptionHand in Hand gegen den ganzen Wahnsinn
Created24 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/frieden_Peace

Growth

1577 August 2026 — 157 subscribers8 August 2026 — 157 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 156–158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:16157no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:17157first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 157 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (1 July 20256 August 2026)
Views total18
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,640
Videos
3,060
Links
2,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
52m 42s
Average length
8m 47s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮444.4%
222.2%
😱111.1%
🤔111.1%
🤝111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @middle_east_spectatorPhoto

— 🇺🇸/🇮🇷 President Trump: ‘We’re having very good talks with Iran’ @Middle_East_Spectator

15 Mar 2026, 19:51 UTC92 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostseekrabbe_mvVideo

DER WEG VOM KINDERSCHUTZ ZUR KINDERPORNOGRAFIE-MAFIA Das Milliardengeschäft mit dem Kindes"wohl" Jährlich finden mindestens 80.000 Inobhutnahmen statt – durchaus auch mit fadenscheinigen Begründungen. Was wird mit diesen Kindern gemacht? "Sexueller Missbrauch wurde an einigen Heimkindern vorgenommen. Sie wurden nicht nur aus ihren Familien, sondern auch aus ihren Schulen herausgerissen..." Manche (Kinder) werden

4 Oct 2025, 12:22 UTC174 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @waswirklichistPhoto

⚠️ Höchste Gefahr! Spannungsfall wegen Krieg bald möglich! Oben herrscht Panik, alles fliegt auf und ihnen um die Ohren, der Impf-Massenmord, die von ihnen herbeigeführte Migration, das Geldsystem ist am Ende und das Land total pleite. Das ist zwar alles von ihnen gemacht aber sie brauchen noch ein wenig Zeit, um das Digitale-Gefängnis und Geld zu vollenden. Gerade ist das System am schwächsten Punkt, weil es nun i

1

3 Sept 2025, 13:22 UTC142 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

‼️🤗🤗❤️❤️ 13.9.25 Berlin, Brandenburger Tor!!!! Didi ich freue mich auf Dich ❤️ ‼️

1 Sept 2025, 06:52 UTC116 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @davebrych_publicPhoto

„Statistisch fast unmöglich“ Wolfgang Seitz (Rheinberg, 59 Jahre), Wolfgang Klinger (Schwerte, 71 oder 72 Jahre), Stefan Berendes (Bad Lippspringe, 59 Jahre) und Ralph Lange (Blomberg, 66 oder 67 Jahre). https://x.com/shomburg/status/1961508144322154814?s=46 https://www1.wdr.de/nachrichten/wahlen/kommunalwahlen-2025/badlippspringe-kandidat-gestorben-100.html

🤔1😱1

25 Jul 2025, 07:10 UTC153 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BitchBotBoiiLivePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

23 Jul 2025, 06:06 UTC190 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Satanisch: Merz für Abtreibung bis zur Geburt!💥 https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp2QZZ7-Bs&si=PEDJZcNpGHhOUGGb

🤮4

23 Jul 2025, 05:53 UTC94 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @elektroallergischVideo

💉🧠 Erst unwissentlich implantieren dann unwissentlich aktivieren 🔦 Dieses Experiment, das von Mitgliedern von La Quinta Columna durchgeführt wurde, zeigt deutlich, wie zuvor implantierte Menschen der Infrarot-Wellenlänge vor allem durch Mobilgeräte ausgesetzt werden, und zwar unter dem Vorwand, den „Annäherungssensor“ in unserem Mobiltelefon zu nutzen. La Quinta Columna und wir, ermutigen andere Menschen, dieses E

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @frieden_Peace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,175,940 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Frieden und Freiheit für die ganze Welt” (@frieden_Peace), 157 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frieden_Peace.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.