Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

罗湖MM岚岚姐

@frewqz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

394subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004337727020
TypeChannel
Username@frewqz
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 17 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/frewqz

Growth

3946 Aug 2026, 20:05 — 394 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:20 — 394 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:056 Aug 2026, 20:20
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 393–395 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 20:20394no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:05394first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
259.0%
avg views ÷ 394 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.121%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held8 (17 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total8,164
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC269 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📢 开奖结果公布 🎁 活动:罗湖MM岚岚口令红包¥500元:@ww1371522 当前参与人数:269人 🏆 中奖名单: 1. Melching 奖品:口令红包¥500元 2. Hfefb 奖品:P优惠50元 3. 我就 奖品:P优惠50元 4. You 奖品:P优惠50元 5. 梧桐 奖品:pp优惠100元 6. Ann 奖品:pp优惠100元 7. 确定 奖品:pp优惠100元 8. s 奖品:夜课优惠200元 9. 旅途 奖品:夜课优惠200元 10. 小绵羊 奖品:夜课优惠200元 11. 黑丝终结者 奖品:包时优惠100元 12. 鸡长 奖品:包时优惠100元 13. 舰 奖品:包时优惠100元 ⏰ 开奖时间:2026年08月06日 16时00分

1

30 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,150 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎁 罗湖MM岚岚口令红包¥500元:@ww1371522 📦 奖品内容: 💰 口令红包¥500元 ×1 💰 P优惠50元 ×3 💰 pp优惠100元 ×3 💰 夜课优惠200元 ×3 💰 包时优惠100元 ×3 👥 参与条件: 🔗 加入-深圳瓜子出击大队 └ 💬 发言数大于 3 条 🔗 加入-深圳天猫修车大队 └ 💬 发言数大于 3 条 🔗 加入-深圳途虎修车大队 └ 💬 发言数大于 3 条 🔗 加入-罗湖MM岚岚姐 ⏰ 开奖方式: 定时开奖: 2026年08月06日 16时00分00秒 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 中奖者找当前管理员领取口令红包 优惠券找当前老师消费抵扣

1

30 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,010 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

深圳 罗湖 岚姐 个人 熟女 兼职 找年轻的请绕行 亲亲 不要在这里和我聊,我这个飞机没声音 也不经常在线 麻烦你加我其他联系方式 说电报里面看到的 与你号 ww1985 ww600619 电报号 @ww1371522 QQ号 3183161733 QQ号 2169107388 频道 @frewqz 双向机器人 @langlang5201314love_bot 电话 19924551061 地址罗湖九号线人民南B出口 价格 3张起(看上面课表图) 自带课室 方便停车 不管加了微信和QQ说在飞机上看到的 说了优先通过 不要问 可不可无套 内射 扣逼 颜射 问了也不回复 亲亲 到频道里看照片,看课表如约课的话还是加其他的联系方式,这里没声音也不经常在 如发信息不回,请打电话。不约就不要打扰

2

30 Jul 2026, 05:17 UTC999 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎁 罗湖MM岚岚口令红包¥500元:@ww1371522 📦 奖品内容: 💰 口令红包¥500元 ×1 💰 P优惠50元 ×3 💰 pp优惠100元 ×3 💰 包时优惠100元 ×3 💰 夜课优惠200元 ×3 👥 参与条件: 🔗 加入-深圳修车大队 └ 💬 发言数大于 3 条 🔗 加入-深圳移动修车大队 └ 💬 发言数大于 3 条 🔗 加入-🏪深圳同城出击大队🏪 └ 💬 发言数大于 3 条 🔗 加入-罗湖MM岚岚姐 ⏰ 开奖方式: 定时开奖: 2026年08月19日 13时00分00秒 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 中奖者找当前管理员领取口令红包 优惠券找当前老师消费抵扣

28 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎁 罗湖MM岚岚口令红包¥500元:@ww1371522 📦 奖品内容: 💰 口令红包¥500元 ×1 💰 P优惠50元 ×3 💰 pp优惠100元 ×3 💰 夜课优惠200元 ×3 💰 包时优惠100元 ×3 👥 参与条件: 🔗 加入-深圳瓜子出击大队 └ 💬 发言数大于 3 条 🔗 加入-深圳天猫修车大队 └ 💬 发言数大于 3 条 🔗 加入-深圳途虎修车大队 └ 💬 发言数大于 3 条 🔗 加入-罗湖MM岚岚姐 ⏰ 开奖方式: 定时开奖: 2026年08月06日 16时00分00秒 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 中奖者找当前管理员领取口令红包 优惠券找当前老师消费抵扣

28 Jul 2026, 05:41 UTC865 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

✅ 已识别当前群组/频道 名称:罗湖MM岚岚姐 类型:频道 Chat ID:-1004337727020 公开用户名:@frewqz 请复制上面的 Chat ID,到后台验证条件里直接填写。 私密群/私密频道优先使用这个 ID,最稳定。 也可以随时发送 /chatid 再查询一次。

17 Jul 2026, 05:11 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

深圳 罗湖 岚姐熟女兼职 找年轻的请绕行 亲亲 不要在这里和我聊,我这个飞机没声音 也不经常在线 麻烦你加我其他联系方式 说电报里面看到的 与你号 ww1985 ww600619 电报号 @ww1371522 QQ号 3448296096 QQ号 2169107388 频道 @frewqz 双向机器人 @langlang5201314love_bot 电话 19924551061 地址罗湖九号线人民南B出口 价格 3张起(看上面课表图) 自带课室 方便停车 不管加了微信和QQ说在飞机 上看到的 说了优先通过 不要问可不可无套 内射 问了也不回复

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @frewqz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 740,735 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“罗湖MM岚岚姐” (@frewqz), 394 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frewqz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.