Channel
@frenchmoha
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,688subscribers
-244 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001530987853 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @frenchmoha |
| Description | ⭐️ قناة الأستاذ محمد علي الكناني مدرس مادة اللغة الفرنسية، خريج المعهد الفرنسي في العراق. حساب الأستاذ الشخصي للاستفسار: @xMoha19 رقم الواتساب للاستفسارات الادارية: 07748875111 🔗 قناة اليوتيوب: https://youtube.com/@xMoha19 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/frenchmoha |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
20,700 average views per post against 18,783 subscribers — an engagement rate of 110.3%. Across the 4,836 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,004–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.98% and 14.2%, with a median of 7.18%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 227,800 |
| Mature posts only | 110.3% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 18,783 measured 5 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:ara · 4,836 channels · p10 1.05% · p25 2.98% · p50 7.18% · p75 14.2% · p90 25.0% |
| Position in cohort | 99.752th percentile · 15.3× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.159% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 81.8% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 05:20 | 18,688 | -40 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:47 | 18,728 | -29 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 18,757 | -22 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:35 | 18,779 | -4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:06 | 18,783 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:00 | 18,797 | -19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:28 | 18,816 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:46 | 18,828 | +6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:05 | 18,822 | +23 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 18,799 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 18,813 | -20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 18,833 | -15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 18,848 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 18,849 | -39 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 18,888 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:44 | 18,905 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 18,919 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 18,922 | -9 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:50 | 18,931 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 18,934 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (14 July 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 228,430 |
| Reactions total | 1,373 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,388 reactions across 58 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8,388 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,388 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
مستواك بالفرنسي سيء؟ هذا بالضبط مكانك الصح. الدورة الربيعية للسادس العلمي — دفعة 2027، نبدي من أول حرف ونمشي وياك لحد الوزاري. 🔥 خصم 67%: 100 ألف بدل 300 أغلب أوائل العراق للعام الماضي مشوا بنفس الطريق. ⌛️ الخصم والتسجيل ينتهون بعد عشر أيام. 📩 احجز هسة: تلكرام @xMoha19 واتساب: 07748875111
❤51
⚠️ موعد ومكان الاختبار الثاني لمحافظة ذي قار
❤45
خلّي نحسبها سوا 👇 لفتين شاورما وببسي = ١١ ألف… وتخلص بربع ساعة. منهج الفرنسي للسادس الإعدادي كامل = نفس الـ ١١ ألف بالشهر… ويبقى وياك لحد الوزاري وتحقق حلمك. العرض: • المنهج كامل بـ ١٠٠ ألف بدل ٣٠٠ ألف • أو قسّطها: ١١ ألف شهرياً مو غلط مطبعي، هذا السعر الحقيقي! للاشتراك دفعة واحدة: @xMoha19 للاشتراك عبر الاقساط: @mirmaz_pos
❤179
أقوى عرض لطلاب السادس علمي الفرنسي + الفيزيا = بـ 200 الف بس للمادتين! 🔥 وتضمن 200/200 درجة بالوزاري 💪 وتگدر تشترك مادة دراسية وحدة فقط بـ 100 الف للمنهج كامل 💯 ⌛️ العرض مستمر لأيام قليلة ☎️ للحجز والإشتراك: @xMoha19
❤73
الدورة الربيعية 2027 🇫🇷 أُعلن رسمياً افتتاح التسجيل في الدورة الربيعية للغة الفرنسية لطلاب السادس العلمي — دفعة 2027 🔥 وبخصم 66.6%: 100 ألف فقط! بدل 300 ألف هاي الدورة ما بنيتها بالكلام — بنيتها سنة بعد سنة، بالنتائج وبثقة الطلاب اللي سبقوك. أغلب أوائل العراق للعام الماضي مشوا بنفس الطريق، ومئات غيرهم وصلوا للدرجة الكاملة من خلاله. واليوم الطريق مفتوح إلك إنت — من مستوى الصفر، حتى لو ما تعرف ولا حرف بالفرنسي. ابدأ …
❤60
تنبيه مهم بخصوص الدورات الإلكترونية
❤102
صدر الدور الثالث رسمياً من وزارة التربية، وخلال الأسبوع المقبل سيتم التصويت عليه من خلال مجلس الوزراء. بعد التصويت على الدور الثالث، سيتم نشر التعليمات الامتحانية وجدول الامتحانات. تم إعطاء #سنة_عدم_الرسوب رسمياً، وبإمكان الذين تم تحويلهم الى الدراسة المسائية الرجوع إلى الدراسة الصباحية دون الاستضافة.
❤118
⚠️ تنبيه مهم: اعزائي طلابي، يوم السبت القادم المصادف 2026/10/24 سيكون آخر يوم للاشتراك والتسجيل بالدورة الشتوية وبخصم ثلث السعر. علمًا انها اخر دورة لهذه الموسم تكون بواقع محاضرتين وامتحانين بالاسبوع اما الدورة اللي بعدها راح تكون مكثفة اكثر. للحجز راسلنا: @xMoha19 تحياتي لكم جميعًا،
❤57
⚠️ موعد الاختبار التأهيلي الثاني لمحافظة النجف الأشرف.
❤50
اليوم اكدر اكول اني غلقت ملف طلاب دفعة ٢٠٢٦ (باستثناء الطلاب المعيدين)، ولو احنا متفقين نبقى اصدقاء طول العمر لكن الحمدلله رحلتنا بالسادس انتهت رسميًا اليوم، رحلة طولت ١٧ شهر مستمر من التعليم والتوجيه والتعب والارشاد والمشورة والنصائح تكللت الحمدلله بأبهى وأجمل النتائج. وأكيد ما ننسى ان النجاح ما يقتصر على تخصص معين، وهذي مو نهاية الطريق بل العكس تمامًا.. هذي أول خطوة بطريق نجاحكم وتميزكم اكاديميًا ومهنيًا. اتمنالك…
❤578
باب التسجيل في الدورة الشتوية لازال مفتوح، وما فاتكم شي — أول محاضرة من المنهج يوم الخميس الجاي 🤍 📩 للحجز: @xMoha19
❤60
⚠️ موعد الاختبار الثاني لاضافة اللغة الفرنسية في محافظة نينوى
❤57
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @frenchmoha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@frenchmoha edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 3 posts on @frenchmoha as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“French by Moha - محمد علي الكناني” (@frenchmoha), 18,688 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frenchmoha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.