Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Рис сто грамм

@fremilcos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

199subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003024787380
TypeChannel
Username@fremilcos
Descriptiontt: fremilcos rednote: ffremilcos
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/fremilcos

Growth

198199198.56 Aug 2026, 18:33 — 198 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:52 — 199 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:32 — 199 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:337 Aug 2026, 04:32
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 198–199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:32199no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:52199+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:33198first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
197.1%
avg views ÷ 199 subscribers
Avg views / post
392
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (18 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,669
Reactions total994
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
159
Videos
27
Links
35

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

994 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519299366279921577122322.4%
custom 542036671889358255618818.9%
custom 540906087032188213213013.1%
custom 5266974160940205975828.25%
custom 5420461195289194050747.44%
custom 5325867233539287761737.34%
custom 5266999952218814546626.24%
custom 5323283321084478351626.24%
custom 5228822490435855055414.12%
custom 5429524546946364477272.72%
custom 5447107060724429089272.72%
custom 522645232132349399150.503%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 994reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fremilcos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC80 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Самое время вспомнить про фотки с МАФа

custom 519299366279921577130custom 542046119528919405019custom 540906087032188213213custom 54295245469463644772custom 54203667188935825561

2 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC820 views106 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

EMIL MESMER 🤍 🥀🥀💙🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🔢 🥀🥀 🤍 Рт?

custom 519299366279921577142custom 542036671889358255629custom 526697416094020597527custom 52669999522188145464custom 53232833210844783512custom 54090608703218821322

31 Jul 2026, 20:15 UTC236 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Счастливое фото смотреть

custom 542036671889358255635custom 519299366279921577128custom 532328332108447835118

30 Jul 2026, 21:30 UTC413 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 519299366279921577128custom 526697416094020597523custom 526699995221881454617

29 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC234 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌹

custom 542952454694636447725custom 519299366279921577121custom 542036671889358255613custom 54090608703218821324

28 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC366 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 PERFUMER 🤩 🫶ph

custom 526699995221881454627custom 542036671889358255623custom 542046119528919405020custom 54090608703218821329custom 53258672335392877612

28 Jul 2026, 17:07 UTC152 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kinzule4kaPhoto

а мы с проектом по identity прошли на вайбкон! ставим туда первый спешл, ждите в москве 22 августа наш волшебный номер ❤️

custom 54203667188935825567custom 54090608703218821324

27 Jul 2026, 23:17 UTC220 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 51929936627992157718custom 52669741609402059756custom 52264523213234939915

27 Jul 2026, 23:16 UTC364 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Едем в Тверь с мяфкой

custom 540906087032188213218custom 526699995221881454613custom 526697416094020597511

23 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC≈1,500 views124 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟 💙🌟 — NAIAD 💙 Рт?

custom 519299366279921577149custom 540906087032188213238custom 542036671889358255634custom 52669741609402059752custom 52669999522188145461

22 Jul 2026, 22:22 UTC360 views98 reactions15 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

🦋

custom 522882249043585505541custom 532586723353928776130custom 544710706072442908927

22 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC184 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rezokunonamiPhoto

🔤🔤🔤 Для участия в ГРАНДЕ по Identity V 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 2027 ищем персонажей с коллажей В приоритете основной каст коа Галочкой отмечены занятые 🔜🔜🔜🔜🔜🔜🔜🔜🔜 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟 Проживание в СПб 🌟Участие в не более 2 грандах и 3 заявках на пятницу в целом 🌟 Платежоспособность 🌟 Возможность сделать качественный образ (стоит уточнить, что мы просим обычные парики и глазки НЕ пуговки) 🌟 Посещение репетиций 🌟 Опыт участия в дефиле 🌟Готов

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @fremilcos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 57,912 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рис сто грамм” (@fremilcos), 199 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fremilcos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.