Channel
@freiselbstbestimmt
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
893subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001136912002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @freiselbstbestimmt |
| Created | 29 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/freiselbstbestimmt |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 893 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 902 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 902 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,404 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
24 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 91.7% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Unsere Heimstätte JUHUU gofundme ist fertig 🙏 Wie wir schon sagten, hat eine LÖWENMUTTI diese Aktion für uns angelegt und ins Leben gerufen! DANKE DANKE DANKE! ❤️💕 Der Weg ist steinig - der Weg ist hart. Aber wir wollen dies alles nicht auf uns sitzen lassen. Aus dem Zuhause vertrieben mittels Unterstellungen und Falschbehauptungen. Da wir uns keinen Anwalt leisten konnten, haben wir das Verfahren in der ersten I…
Unsere Heimstätte Sicherlich habe wir - da wir uns selbst verteidigt haben und uns keinen Anwalt leisten konnten - auch viele Fehler gemacht, da wir die Tricks und Kniffe dieses Rechtssystems nicht kennen. Aber wir haben es zumindest versucht. Justus hat so auch u.a. das Jugendamt angeschrieben. Und Kopien seiner Schreiben an verschiedene Instanzen verteilt - in der Hoffnung auf Hilfe und Unterstützung. Das Sozial…
Altes Pastorat Osterhever Regen Is the rain Falling from the sky Keeping you from Singing Aber was kommt nach dem Regen? https://t.me/unsereHeimstatt
Altes Pastorat Osterhever Haftbefehl für 20,- Euro https://t.me/unsereHeimstatt
Altes Pastorat Osterhever Haftbefehl für 20,- Euro - Falschparken in Büsum Vollstreckt sollte werden zum Tag der Zwangsräumung. Der Haftbefehl ist aus dem Jahr 2024. Die Polizei fuhr fast täglich am Pastorat vorbei - und jedes Mal wenn sie einen von uns sahen, haben sie freundlich gewunken. Im Frühling 2025 hatten wir eine ausführliche Polizeikontrolle im Auswärtigen Amt. Nichts lag vor. Aber am 17.6.2026 sollte im…
Altes Pastorat Osterhever Wir haben mal ein Experiment gemacht .... 😅 Gute Nacht euch allen. Gode Nacht Leider brach die Kamera an Schluss ab und hat das Beste nicht fest gehalten... https://t.me/unsereHeimstatt
Altes Pastorat Osterhever Justus Schlagzeug Erstmal in Obhut. Erstmal trocken 🙏🙏 https://t.me/unsereHeimstatt
❤1
Altes Pastorat Osterhever Wir können morgen nochmal in die Lagerhalle. JEDE HAND und HILFE ist herzlich willkommen 🙏 Ab 10 können wir Ausräumen. Wenn du helfen möchtest - bitte PN https://t.me/unsereHeimstatt
🙏2
Altes Pastorat Osterhevr Aus den Geschehnissen, aus den Schreiben des Gerichts der letzten Tage bleibt uns die Erkenntnis: Klappe halten. Hinsetzen. Aufgeben. Wir wissen nicht, ob wir uns noch weiter wehren sollen und können. Die politischen und kirchlichen Interessen sind gesetzt. Wir sind zu klein. Wenn wir nun aufgeben - dann werden wir DENNOCH all unsere Schreiben hier veröffentlichen! Es soll HINAUS IN DIE W…
❤2
Altes Pastorat Osterhever Unsere Erkenntnis der letzten Tage: Als ;MENSCH - v.a. ohne finanzielles Polster - hast Du "gegen" das System KEINE CHANCE. Wir haben uns gegen die behaupteten "Verstöße gegen den Mietvertrag" gewehrt. Wir haben versucht, Vollstreckungsschutz gegen die Zwangsräumung zu erwirken. Wir haben Härtefälle beantragt. Wir haben versucht, unser Eigentum zu sichern und zu schützen. Wir haben Eilanträ…
❤3
Altes Pastorat Osterhever #Schreiben Zur Zeit geschieht zu viel ..... Räumen, Sortieren, Einlagern, Sich Wehren, Schreiben schreiben...und dann noch zwischendurch arbeiten. Deswegen arbeiten wir nun langsam nach, was wir versäumt haben. Hier soll ALLES gesammelt werden. Unsere Schreiben, unsere Versuche, uns gegen diese falschen Behauptungen zur Wehr zu setzen. Gegen die Institutionen hat dies nun offensichtlich ni…
Altes Pastorat Osterhever " Vermieterpfandrecht" GOTT sei DANK, hat uns die Firma Zutritt gewährt und wir konnten am 24.7. mit Helfern den größten Teil des Lagers leeren. Einige Dinge sind noch drin: Sachen des Vormieters, Sachen der Vermieterin, Fremdeigentum sowie aufgrund der chaotischen Räumung des Pastorats schwer zuordenbare Einzelteile. Auch Justus Schlagzeug steht noch in der Halle. Wir wissen leider nicht…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @freiselbstbestimmt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 753,174 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“frei & selbstbestimmt / www.freiselbstbestimmt.de” (@freiselbstbestimmt), 893 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freiselbstbestimmt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.