Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Freilin_AI - Обзоры/Разборы/Промты

Channel

Freilin_AI - Обзоры/Разборы/Промты

@freilin_ai

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

256subscribers

+134 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003981721980
TypeChannel
Username@freilin_ai
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 4 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/freilin_ai

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1222561898 August 2026 — 122 subscribers9 August 2026 — 122 subscribers15 August 2026 — 162 subscribers22 August 2026 — 180 subscribers30 August 2026 — 186 subscribers9 September 2026 — 204 subscribers17 September 2026 — 209 subscribers2 October 2026 — 256 subscribers8 August 20262 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 55 days, net +134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102–276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Oct 2026, 01:37256+47
17 Sept 2026, 08:20209+5
9 Sept 2026, 07:59204+18
30 Aug 2026, 07:43186+6
22 Aug 2026, 11:38180+18
15 Aug 2026, 10:47162+40
9 Aug 2026, 03:30122no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:00122first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3546.1%
❤2330.3%
⚡1114.5%
👍45.26%
🎉22.63%
🏆11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @freilin_ai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Seedance 2.5 на знакомой сцене из «Аладдина» Задача была не просто сделать красивый полёт на ковре, а посмотреть, сможет ли нейросеть внутри одного 30-секундного ролика собрать полноценную последовательность сцен и без единого референса. И промпт пропустило с первого раза. По раскадровке смогла удержать 8 самостоятельных сцен, при этом сама держит переходы между общими, средними и крупными планами. This is an unoff…

❤1

7 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC64 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Кажется, Землю снова придётся спасать 🛸 Решил представить, как могла бы выглядеть моя версия «Людей в чёрном», и собрал этот ролик с помощью Seedance 2.5 и всего трёх референсов. Задача была простая: сохранить узнаваемую атмосферу, чёрные костюмы, секретных агентов, инопланетную угрозу и тот самый юмор, без которого люди в чёрном превращаются просто в сотрудников очень строгого банка. Получился небольшой фанатский э…

❤5🔥3🏆1

7 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC69 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

550 файлов. 20 ГБ материала. Пять дней с Seedance 2.5 Кажется, теперь я хотя бы могу сделать выводы, а не судить по трём красивым роликам как привыкли в интернете 🤌 - Картинка действительно стала лучше. Больше деталей, лучше лица, меньше артефактов. В простых сценах модель очень часто делала то, что я хотел, с первой попытки. Файлы выходят с битрейтом 20 Мбит/с. - Со звуком есть странность. Когда просишь ролик без …

❤6⚡4🔥4

6 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC78 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Великий и могучий Русский язык Seedance 2.5 vs MiniMax H3 Минимакс слаб по эмоциям по сравнению с Сиденс. Но мне кажется, если я ещё покопаюсь в промпте может сделать что-то похожее. #ТЕСТ #MiniMaxH3

🔥8

5 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC90 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Отрывок из фильма "Пункт назначения" 30-second fictional cinematic roller-coaster accident. A group of adult riders are on a huge roller coaster at night. During the ride, a loose metal component begins shaking beneath one carriage, sparks appear near the wheels, and the safety system starts failing. The carriage rattles violently as the riders panic and scream. As the train speeds through a sharp turn, part of the…

🔥6❤4👍4

5 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC93 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Seedance2.5 протестить бесплатно? РЕАЛЬНО! 1. Заходите на сайт и заходите через google аккаунт. 2. Нажимаете - Создать видео - Seedance 2.5 - 10 second И прописываете промпт. 3. Спустя 4-5 минут приходит ваше видео 4. Выходите из аккаунта. Заходите в другой аккаунт действия повторяем. В день можно сделать - 1 ролик. Но если аккаунтов много... В комментариях присылайте свои творения ⤵️ #seedance25 #seedance2

❤4🔥4⚡2

4 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC97 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

«Kling 3.0 сделает то же самое. Только дешевле» 😀 Ну хорошо. Решил проверить Seedance2.5 на цензуру. Перестрелки, драки, аварии, кровь, грим, протезы и VFX. Что пропускает, а что блокирует. Через пару дней выложу большой разбор. В закрытом чате! Шутка. Будут промпты и результаты #seedance2 #Seedance25 #цензура

🔥6❤3🎉2

4 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC99 views9 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Какие проекты у меня в работе ⤵️ #НАДЧЕМЯРАБОТАЮ

⚡5🔥4

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @freilin_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Freilin_AI - Обзоры/Разборы/Промты” (@freilin_ai), 256 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freilin_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.