Channel
@freepsysupport
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
79subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003028912440 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @freepsysupport |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/freepsysupport |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 79 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 80 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 80 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
321 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 96 | 29.9% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 16.5% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 10.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 7.79% | |
| 🍾 | 20 | 6.23% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 5.92% | |
| 👌 | 14 | 4.36% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 3.12% | |
| 🤝 | 10 | 3.12% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 3.12% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 2.80% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 2.49% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 1.87% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 1.25% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.623% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.623% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 321reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 15 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А здесь моё радостное напоминание! Сегодня воскресный эфир Здесь 👇 https://t.me/logovoemigranta Начало в 1️⃣8️⃣*️⃣1️⃣8️⃣ Потираю ручки 🖊️ За ссылкой на зум как всегда в личку, плиз Бросайте в комменты ссылки на ваши соцсети, чтоб потом не искать 👇
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
В какой стране вы «прописаны»
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
☝🏿ВЧЕРА В НОВОСТЯХ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 1️⃣ Делягин часто дает такие вбросы-прогнозы. Для чего? Инфу эту периодически удаляют. Зачем? 2️⃣ Да, Делягина используют для прогрева и теста настроения аудитории. Съедят или нет? Съедят. 3️⃣А заблокируют? К выборам - скорее да, как минимум сильно замедлят. Про выборы в сентябре и как быть, про стратегии продвижения говорила орала вам 🫨 на эфирах Чё делать собира…
💯8🔥8❤5😐4🥰1😍1
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
Video message, posted without a caption
👍7
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
Проверь своё лицо на телегеничность с учётом науки восприятия, фотографии и кастинговой практики 👀Важно: лицо не является фиксированным объектом Оно меняется в зависимости от света, ракурса, фокусного расстояния, выражения и движения. Телегеничность = способность выглядеть выразительно в разных условиях съёмки, а не только «удачно» в бытовой жизни. 1. Реакция на свет Телегеничное лицо хорошо выдерживает • жё…
🤔10👍9❤3😍1
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
Live stream finished (3 hours)
Самое важное здесь ⤴️ Комменты, плиз ⤵️
❤13
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤12
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤12
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤9
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤10
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
ФЛОУ ЛИСТ Слушать до конца
❤8
Signed Tatiana Pismenskaya @tati31415
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @freepsysupport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В какой стране вы «прописаны»
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 15 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 690,969 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЫТИНГ 2:0” (@freepsysupport), 79 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freepsysupport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.