Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CHANNEL - Freedom Gibraltar

@freedomgibraltar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

208subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460101149
TypeChannel
Username@freedomgibraltar
DescriptionNews updates & General Interest
Created23 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/freedomgibraltar

Growth

2087 Aug 2026, 01:38 — 208 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:47 — 208 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:387 Aug 2026, 03:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:47208no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:38208first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.2%
avg views ÷ 208 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.6
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total370
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,140
Videos
5,430
Links
9,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍342.9%
228.6%
🔥114.3%
🤣114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC46 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @greatrejectVideo

Expensive way of waking up... Tiktok: t_k_tropicano ✅ Join us @greatreject ⭐️ Shop

Signed Roseann Capurro

1 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thedailyrabbitVideo

Another coincidence? 🔗 THE WHITE RABBIT 👁 (t.me/thedailyrabbit) ⚠️I found a hidden channel: "Health Secrets by Dr. Sebi" check it out before it disappears!

🔥1

Signed Roseann Capurro

1 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC35 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Free_Energy_TeslaPhoto

SUBMARINE'S FREE ENERGY FUEL Nuclear is a hoax made to scare and control us, so we wouldn't know how good these minerals are. "Nuclear" is nothing but Uranium and Raidum (which also comes from Uranium). Those 2 minerals are very safe and are filled with energy, imagine having to run our cars with Uranium (or water) and not refueling it for years, or lighting our cities with it. Our world can be very advanced simply

Signed Libella Freeall

1 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Free_Energy_TeslaVideo

A recent peer reviewed study reveals that AI systems in 2025 consumed between 312.5 and 764.6 billion liters of water, which is equivalent to the global bottled water industry's annual usage, primarily for cooling data centers powering models the AI. This massive demand arises from the evaporative cooling needed to manage the heat from intensive computations, highlighting AI's hidden environmental toll amid surging

Signed Libella Freeall

24 Jul 2026, 22:03 UTC47 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbKI-HBsjbw/?igsh=MWhqMzBoYnd4YXJvYQ==

Signed Roseann Capurro

24 Jul 2026, 21:44 UTC28 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RussianBaZaVideo

Police officer becomes a whistleblower and says that Flock Safety Cameras are not what we’re being told they are. He says they are not just capturing license plates, they are capturing everything and being used for mass surveillance without a warrant, “It records the make, the model, color, bumping stickers, you name it — it's a very sophisticated AI software that uses a camera system to track and monitor every vehi

Signed Roseann Capurro

24 Jul 2026, 21:41 UTC32 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @LauraAbolichannel

The Fabian Society itself states that every Labour Prime Minister has been a Fabian, and that today hundreds of Labour politicians, including Keir Starmer and more than half of his Cabinet, are members. United Kingdom Prime Ministers Keir Starmer Tony Blair Gordon Brown Harold Wilson Clement Attlee Ramsay MacDonald Senior Labour politicians Angela Rayner David Lammy Yvette Cooper Ed Miliband Peter Mandelson Roy

Signed Roseann Capurro

24 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC31 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @LauraAbolichannelVideo

Do black South Africans get to be accused of being racists for this? Or is it just Europeans that get the label? Just curious…

Signed Roseann Capurro

24 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC33 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/was-107-a-false-flag-questions-for?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=725827&post_id=207764407&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=43r5oh&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Signed Roseann Capurro

22 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @LauraAbolichannelVideo

'WE’RE ALWAYS WATCHING' — pranksters hijack Meta’s AI glasses ad in London A lenticular overlay turns Kylie Jenner into a skeleton when viewed from an angle, accusing Meta’s camera-equipped glasses of turning everyday life into 24/7 surveillance

🤣1

Signed Roseann Capurro

14 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC69 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RussianBaZaVideo

Police officer becomes a whistleblower and says that Flock Safety Cameras are not what we’re being told they are. He says they are not just capturing license plates, they are capturing everything and being used for mass surveillance without a warrant, “It records the make, the model, color, bumping stickers, you name it — it's a very sophisticated AI software that uses a camera system to track and monitor every vehi

Signed Roseann Capurro

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @freedomgibraltar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,311,394 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CHANNEL - Freedom Gibraltar” (@freedomgibraltar), 208 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freedomgibraltar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.