Channel
@free_uk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
771subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001463518420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @free_uk |
| Description | We are FREE UK. Resistance group against the new Nazi-Communism. We want freedom of choice. See pinned messages for how you can help. |
| Created | 27 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/free_uk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 771 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 771 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
FREE UK pinned «CRYPTOCURRENCIES AS AN ANTI-SYSTEM WEAPON: The inventor of Bitcoin had the goal of removing power from bankers and establishing a democratic currency in which our money is not governed by an oligarchy, but is instead issued, managed and controlled in a decentralized…»
CRYPTOCURRENCIES AS AN ANTI-SYSTEM WEAPON: The inventor of Bitcoin had the goal of removing power from bankers and establishing a democratic currency in which our money is not governed by an oligarchy, but is instead issued, managed and controlled in a decentralized and transparent way. Decentralization is important in every sector, from technology to politics, and it is precisely the decentralized systems that hav…
How Apple will scan your iPhone violating your privacy. https://youtu.be/BCJuzf7Nu98 SHARE !! https://t.me/free_uk
FREE UK pinned «BMJ gets fact checked. Dr. John Campbell destroys fact-checkers and shows how stupid even the concept of fact-checking is. No errors found on BMJ. https://youtube.com/watch?v=lMf-Zq7xJcY»
BMJ gets fact checked. Dr. John Campbell destroys fact-checkers and shows how stupid even the concept of fact-checking is. No errors found on BMJ. https://youtube.com/watch?v=lMf-Zq7xJcY
💥MUST SEE‼️ MUCH ANTICIPATED INTERVIEW WITH DAVID CLEWS OF UNN Talking about THE 🇬🇧 UK PEOPLE'S CONVOY 🇬🇧 https://www.bitchute.com/video/Hi2e7awa4UhZ/ SHARE‼️SHARE‼️ SHARE‼️
🆘✅ THE LEGEND ⚽ MATT LE TISSIER 😇 Just sent this personal message on WhatsApp 🙌🏼FULLY SUPPORTS THE 🇬🇧 UK PEOPLES CONVOY 🇬🇧 SOUTHAMPTON ST MARY'S ⚽ 🏟 CONFIRMED FOR 10am SUNDAY STRAIGHT UP THE M3‼️HAPPY DAY 🎉 GIVE IT A SHARE‼️
IF ANYTHING NEEDS ADDING TO THIS LIST BEFORE UNN INTERVIEW AT 8:30pm TONIGHT THEN PLEASE LET US KNOW IN THIS GROUP https://t.me/BCASolve
🇬🇧SSS🇬🇧 UK PEOPLE'S CONVOY 🙌🏼 SERVICE STATION SATURDAY ‼️ #DoYourBit
🇬🇧 UK PEOPLE'S CONVOY 🙌🏼 THIS GROUP CAN HELP WITH TRANSPORT ARRANGEMENTS‼️ Whether you need a lift or got space, sort it out people https://t.me/UKConvoyTravel
German Lawyer Dr. Reiner Füllmich working with an international team to dismantle the fake covid narrative gives an update for 2022. https://youtu.be/SXS-rdu07QI
The Great Reset explained in plain English by Russell Brand. https://youtu.be/BXTPzFSx6oI
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @free_uk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 325,209 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@free_uk named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FREE UK” (@free_uk), 771 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/free_uk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.