2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 00:46
14
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:12
14
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 20 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
34
Links
12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
24
40.7%
👍
14
23.7%
🔥
14
23.7%
🍾
3
5.08%
💯
3
5.08%
👏
1
1.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 13 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @frc_global. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2025 to 13 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📹 Recently our team took part in a webinar organized by Oak3D Visualisation Studio for the UAE market talking about how to build trust in a high-pressure UAE real estate market and asking the question what makes developers choose partners, not just vendors.
🇦🇪 During the session, we discussed how PR today helps developers in the UAE not only build reputation, but also solve real business challenges, key topics inclu…
🇦🇪 The UAE is strengthening the role of Arabic: what it means for media, PR and marketing
As reported by Khaleej Times, the UAE is preparing a new Arabic Language Law — and this is an important signal not only for public institutions, but also for businesses, media, PR and marketing teams.
According to the draft law, Arabic should be present in public-facing communications, including visual, audio and written adver…
⚡️ FRC ranks among the TOP 70 largest PR agencies in Russia 🏆
❤️ FRC has been included in the TOP 70 largest PR agencies in Russia, ranking 49th in the Smart Ranking study.
🔍The research analyzes the balance of power in the PR market and aims to create a transparent benchmark for both clients and agencies. According to Smart Ranking, the Russian PR market is expected to exceed 23 billion rub in 2025, and we are pr…
🆕 We launch new analytics division to boost PR and marketing effectiveness in B2B
❤️ We thrilled to announce that we’ve launched a new analytics division for B2B communications and marketing in Fresh Russian Communications!
Its goal is to help companies make data-driven decisions and strengthen their communications through competitive intelligence, channel effectiveness assessment, and reputation audits.
👤The divis…
Research: 64% of B2B companies in Russia are already implementing ESG projects
At FRC agency, we conducted a study on ESG communications among Russian B2B companies and we're sharing the results!
We analyzed who initiates ESG projects, why companies engage in ESG communications at all, and what barriers prevent them from talking more about sustainability.
The key insights are summarized here below, the full report…
How to enter new markets without losing your identity: A PR-guide for growing brands
Successful businesses don’t start with the goal of getting rich — they start with an idea that solves a real problem.
And in that case, knowing how to communicate your mission becomes crucial. As your brand grows, new markets and new audiences come into play. So here’s the big question: how do you adapt your PR strategy to unfamili…
⚡️FRC ranked among the top in the national rating of communication companies of Russia (NR2C) 🏆
❤️ Fresh Russian Communications agency has been listed in the TOP 100 of the National Rating of Communication Companies (NR2C) for the ninth year in a row.
The NR2C rating is based on unified, objective criteria, ensuring transparency and credibility. It also provides participants with valuable market insights and helps …
How to set PR goals — and actually achieve them
One of the most common mistakes in PR planning is confusing goals, objectives, and KPIs. For example, the number of media mentions is not a goal — it’s just one metric that should serve a broader strategic objective.
Here’s how to set PR goals that truly create value for your business:
1️⃣ Start with business goals. PR should support sales, brand recognition, reputat…
❤3👍2🔥2👏1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @frc_global. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FRC Agency 🇷🇺 Global” (@frc_global), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frc_global.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.