Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝑭𝑹𝑨𝑵𝑵𝑨 🗽

@frannadb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

246subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001647049543
TypeChannel
Username@frannadb
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/frannadb

Growth

245246245.57 August 2026 — 245 subscribers8 August 2026 — 245 subscribers15 August 2026 — 246 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 245–246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:37246+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:35245no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:42245first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 31 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1522.4%
💋1319.4%
💘1014.9%
🔥710.4%
🤣710.4%
❤‍🔥45.97%
34.48%
🤯34.48%
😁22.99%
😱22.99%
🥰11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2024 to 7 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Mar 2024, 12:08 UTC≈1,530 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[☕️] ➣ замедления, замедленки Джейсон ДиЛаурентис — 57 | s2,3 | 16:9 | [в комм.] #замедления #замедленки #джейсондилаурентис 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 — @frannadb

❤‍🔥4🔥4🤣3

Signed .

24 Feb 2024, 12:57 UTC≈2,490 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[☕️] ➣ нарезки, Джон Леннон — 62 | p1 | 16:9 | [в комм.] #нарезки #джонленнон 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 — @frannadb

💋4🔥2🤣21

Signed .

16 Feb 2024, 14:52 UTC≈1,070 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

[🔫] – Жду ваши запросы🤗

1💋1🤣1

Signed .

14 Feb 2024, 17:55 UTC≈1,830 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[🔫] ➣ фотошоп Рейчел Рот и Лекси Брэндсон — 4 | – | 1:1 | [в комм.] #фотошоп #рейчелрот #лексибрэндсон 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 — @frannadb

11💋1💘1🤣1

Signed .

10 Feb 2024, 11:54 UTC≈1,540 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[❤️‍🩹] ➣ нарезки, Ниган Смит — 31 | 7 | 16:9 | [в комм.] #нарезки #нигансмит 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 — @frannadb

💋42💘21😱1

Signed .

3 Feb 2024, 16:21 UTC≈1,640 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[🔫] ➣ фотошоп Дин Винчестер и Фиона Галлагер — 4 | – | 1:1 | [в комм.] #фотошоп #динвинчестер #фионагаллагер 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 — @frannadb

4🤯2💋1💘1

Signed .

3 Feb 2024, 15:44 UTC≈1,460 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[❤️‍🩹] ➣ нарезки Клаус Майклсон — 35 | s4 | 16:9 | [в комм.] #нарезки #клаусмайклсон 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 — @frannadb

3💘1🔥1😁1

Signed .

3 Feb 2024, 15:04 UTC≈1,640 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[🗽] ➣ скринкапсы Сабрина Спелмен — 41 | s1 | 16:9 | [в комм.] #скринкапсы #сабринаспелмен 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 — @frannadb

2💋1💘1😱1

Signed .

1 Feb 2024, 08:22 UTC≈1,670 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[🔫] ➣ стикеры Хардин Скотт — 50 | 1 | 1:1 | [в комм.] #стикеры #хардинскотт 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 — @frannadb

💘21🤯1

Signed 𝕾𝖆𝖓𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖔.

31 Jan 2024, 21:07 UTC686 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем приветики ребята. Я новый-старый админ. Моё имя Киса.(Сантанико). Надо бы оживить тут все, поэтому ждем ваших запросов)👍 (С нарезками я пока не работаю)

1💋1

Signed 𝕾𝖆𝖓𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖔.

31 Jan 2024, 20:59 UTC≈1,460 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

[🔫] ➣ фотошоп Дженна Ортега и Кэндис Кинг — 3 | – | 1:1 | [в комм.] #фотошоп #дженнаортега #кэндискинг 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 — @frannadb

💘2🥰1😁1

Signed 𝕾𝖆𝖓𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖔.

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @frannadb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,004,664 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑭𝑹𝑨𝑵𝑵𝑨 🗽” (@frannadb), 246 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frannadb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.