3 measurements spanning 23 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 242–243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 22:04
242
-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:46
243
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:10
243
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 19 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
183 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
78
42.6%
❤
50
27.3%
custom 5237763199301858520
20
10.9%
👍
13
7.10%
✍
12
6.56%
🐳
5
2.73%
👏
3
1.64%
🦄
2
1.09%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2025 to 7 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
169
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 11 we hold a reading for · 82%
Most on one post
77
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @franchdedho. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 August 2025 to 7 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
+1 хорошее место - «Дед Хо»
Сегодня открыли новое партнёрское бистро в Петербурге.
📍 Авиаконструкторов, 54
Флагман на 50 посадок.
По модели точки считаем 4+ млн оборота к августу.
❓Откуда берётся уверенность в таких прогнозах?
С 2017 года мы построили 70+ бистро.
И у нас есть данные каждого рубля сети:
когда он пришёл, в какой точке, от какого гостя и при каких условиях.
Через банки, сервисы и систему лояльности…
«Дед Хо» — хорошее место?
Для гостей и партнёров ответ сейчас всё чаще ищут в одном месте — в отзывах. Важно, чтобы они были живыми и в большом количестве.
В августе мы сильно задумались, как системно и без уговоров мотивировать реальных гостей оставлять положительные отзывы. Стандартных механик, как у всех, стало не хватать — так появился @dedho_quest_bot.
Запустили его в конце ноября.
Сейчас бот даёт дополнитель…
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
НА КАНАЛЕ СНОВА ПОЛГОДА ТИХО 🤐😐🫣
И @mainecolog говорит мне через день, что это совсем не дело.
Надо отменять рабочие дела в личное время и снова начать рассказывать как дела в Хо 🤌
Как считаете — есть смысл?
Или «нафиг надо, все-равно телега сдохнет через месяц»?
#насвязи_евсеева
В августе 2024 мы столкнулись с тем, что рабочие руки на рынке стали жестким дефицитом.
Можно было вступить в кровавую гонку в задирании ставок. Но как бы это помогло фин.модели? Верно – никак. Только бы усугубило. А сотрудники как бегали, так и бегают в поиске лучшего места под солнцем. Ну пусть бегают дальше…
Чем их можно заменить?
Автоматизацией конечно. Один из вариантов, который пришел на ум — киоски самообслу…
Что делать когда с персоналом 🍑 ?
Одна из проблем, с которой мы столкнулись в 2024 году и она остается актуальной до сих пор сейчас… это – нехватка людских ресурсов
И если бы не предпринятые шаги ранее – не знаю как бы мы выжили этим летом.
Я лично помню много закрытых дверей заведений. Некоторые шли на отчаянные методы, как этот парень у метро на фото. Только не уверенна, что его метод особо рабочий 😁
Мы тоже кое…
Всем привет! На связи Дима Николаев.
👆 Катя блестяще рассказала, как мы заманиваем гостей с улицы.
Но что происходит, когда они переступают порог?
Хочу уверить, если команда внутри подкачает, то весь наш дорогой фасадный маркетинг пойдет прахом!
Можно потратить сотни тысяч на неон и цветы, но если гостю некомфортно, сервис посредственный, а еда не оправдывает ожиданий — он не вернется. И все — мы теряем десятки тыся…
Путь к первой сотке 💯 pinned ««Зарабатываю ли я на агрегаторах?» – этот вопрос беспокоит многих наших партнеров-франчайзи и не только их. Если посмотреть по сторонам, то невооруженным взглядом видно конкурентов, которые этим вопросом ни разу не задавались. Записали подкаст, в котором…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @franchdedho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2025 to 7 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Путь к первой сотке 💯” (@franchdedho), 242 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/franchdedho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
