Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Хата Главного Узбека

@fraggerrrr_pm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

696subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002086220152
TypeChannel
Username@fraggerrrr_pm
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fraggerrrr_pm

Growth

696697696.57 Aug 2026, 12:43 — 697 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:19 — 697 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:36 — 696 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:438 Aug 2026, 11:36
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 696–697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:36696-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:19697no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:43697first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 33s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

380 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18047.4%
🔥9825.8%
🤣4612.1%
👍307.89%
🏆133.42%
41.05%
😎41.05%
❤‍🔥20.526%
🌚10.263%
🤝10.263%
🥰10.263%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 380reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fraggerrrr_pm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC689 views40 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Алхамдулиллах Ман ойлиман бошка бзани узбекистонда хич ким сравнивать кмисла хаммага коттакон рахмат 🫂❤️

35👍5

12 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC≈2,220 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍9😎3

12 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC≈2,280 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

4🔥2

12 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,720 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

5🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC≈1,480 views51 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

мехмон дост халкмиз кевурасла

🤣3514❤‍🔥2

11 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC≈1,930 views21 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Эртага насб слани шу хамма кориб отирган мухлислани хурсанд клишга харакат кламиз , хаммага рахмат мужики , эртага стрим кевурасла 🫂

164🤝1

11 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC934 views18 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥153

10 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC498 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SALAM_HARDBOYPhoto

#gogoUZB 🇺🇿

🔥155

3 Jul 2026, 01:06 UTC961 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Анчадан бери бунака мазза киб футбол кормодим

10

27 Jun 2026, 23:42 UTC≈1,080 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🤣8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fraggerrrr_pm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,143,968 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хата Главного Узбека” (@fraggerrrr_pm), 696 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fraggerrrr_pm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.