Channel
@fpzn233
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
161subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002954537989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fpzn233 |
| Description | 搬砖挣钱何其难，股市盈利又无望。 要想不做傻逼汉，防骗指南天天看！ 本频道由CNMPZ（草泥马骗子）集团懂事长谭谭特别赞助支持！ |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fpzn233 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 161 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 161 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (16 March 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,152 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
前两天刚办了张流量卡，今天就接到了96110的电话反诈宣传。反诈宣传无孔不入的时代，如果还能够被骗，真的是只能怪自己蠢了。 友情提示：做任何投资时候，当涉及到转账的时候，可以主动给自己的银行卡银行客服电话打电话问一下，不管是股票账户，还是期货账户，都是要在银行签约的，你在银行的app搜索银证转账，或者是银期转账，是能够搜到你的账户签约信息的。 不要给陌生的个人，或者是陌生的公司输入卡号转账，股票账户也好，期货账户也好，都是绑了卡之后自动扣款的，根本不需要你支付宝或者微信或者手动输入卡号转账给一个第三方不认识的人或者公司的。 如果当发现被骗了，已经转账了，尽快拨打96110做止付拦截，三天内拦截追回的概率90%以上，96110的权限是比地方派出所要高的。
所谓一级账户骗局，注意防范，如遇这类骗局已转账，尽快拨打96110止付拦截
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
常见骗局总结： 1，炒外汇，黄金，原油，美股指数。这类骗局通常会让你下载mt4或者某个app，通过银行对私人转账，或者虚拟币u转账入金。然后再配个老师，或者他自己带你操作，给你喊单子。频繁带你交易，不断鼓动你加资金。最后让你爆仓吃光你的本金。这种是对赌盘资金盘，吃客损，你亏多少他赚多少。 2，大宗商品现货，邮币卡，茶叶，不锈钢，红酒，天然气，这种这是爆仓吃本金。 3，炒币，让你通过欧意或者币安买币，再转到一个不知名的平台买币。你一买这个币就天天涨，天天赚钱。但是你要提现就是提不出来，账户能赚一个亿，就是提不出来。这种叫貔貅盘（通常你第一次提钱会给你提）然后各种理由让你加资金。一旦你资金加到位，钱就永远提不出来了。 4，说自己是私募，公墓，庄家，游资，交易员，操盘手，给你发股票账户几千万几百万的截图。（这都是p图的）然后带你打板，带你折价大宗买入，带你vip快速通道买封死涨停，带你打新股，说他有内幕消息。 5.场外个股…
❤1
近期有机器号疯狂私信群友，让加什么付费荐股群。 还是那句话，这么赚钱怎么不带亲戚好友要带你？少了你那几百块会员费就没法活了？ 这么牛逼，那股市该是提款机了，股市里捡钱就好了，需要苦哈哈拉人卖会员荐股？ 注意防骗了，挣点钱真不容易的！ #防骗指南
新鲜的防骗素材又来了！ 广商所，现货咖啡豆 这个是非法期货对赌盘，杠杆爆仓吃本金的。 和早些年的，现货黄金，现货白银，现货原油，沥青，天然气，茶叶，红酒，邮币卡等，都是属于换汤不换药的老套路 2016年刘士余做证监会老大的时候，开展了一次清理地方现货平台（非法期货）运动，没想到十年后又复活了。 受害者比较幸运，装了反诈，反诈中心第一时间给他卡冻了。 #防骗指南
啥也不说了，兄弟们自己看 挣钱是一毛一毛挣，苦哈哈的挣。别让血汗富了别人，还被嘲笑是傻逼 #防骗指南
#防骗指南 MT4炒黄金骗局 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/DVx_6Kf_1TgtrLDTdi-zkw
避雷 差点相信了 骗子
❤1
股转杀猪盘套路，提防此类话术。bbc做过一期币圈杀猪盘专辑视频，大家可以去看看 他们的话术有两个特点 1：反复比较A股的劣势，比如t1.然后说什么A股坐庄，散户被收割 2：煽动冒险，激发人的赌性然后画饼 3：推老师
炒股靠自己！交易唯自渡！ 最近总有人私信我，问我有什么好票推荐，他可以付我会员费，或者赚钱了分我利润。不会让我白推荐。 说实话，遇到这种人，我挺同情他。他把一切希望都寄托在一个陌生人身上，从来不相信自己，或许是长年累月的亏损早已经打穿了自信。 从而寄希望于大神，神灵，期望着有那么一个牛x的人，每个月只收他百来块或者大几千块会员费或者赚钱了抽他点提成，只需要付出小小代价就可以给他带来无尽的利润。 🙉🙈 到最后都是钱也花了，也没赚到什么钱，啥也没学到，每天还要被大神叼你没格局，没认知。自己还像个傻逼一样点头，说老师说的对。心里有一万个妈卖批懦弱到嘴边又咽了回去。🌚 七亏两平一赚，市场总是残酷的，之所以我们选择来到这个市场，都是相信自己是一赚的那个，为了实现这个，我们需要付出很多的精力和思考，而不是两眼空空望着别人，把希望寄托在他人身上。 炒股靠自己！交易唯自渡！ 本人不荐股，也不搞什么付费会员，带人收徒这些，更不会说搞…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @fpzn233. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“股市防骗指南 CNMPZ” (@fpzn233), 161 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fpzn233.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.