Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ПЕРЕЕЗД

@fpocT_wow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

78subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001915575231
TypeChannel
Username@fpocT_wow
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fpocT_wow

Growth

7810 Aug 2026, 16:31 — 78 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 17:48 — 78 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 16:3110 Aug 2026, 17:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–79 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:4878no change
10 Aug 2026, 16:3178first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

641 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14222.2%
custom 541838364659367156714021.8%
💘9014.0%
❤‍🔥6910.8%
🔥507.80%
487.49%
😭436.71%
🎉182.81%
🥰121.87%
🍌111.72%
💋101.56%
🍓71.09%
👾10.156%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 641reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2025 to 11 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fpocT_wow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 April 2025 to 11 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2025, 15:00 UTC234 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ЧО вы тут делаете йоу Отписки быстро Автор хуесос

14❤‍🔥4

Signed Будка Глеба

13 Apr 2025, 07:27 UTC896 views43 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Если что для тех кто спрашивал « что будет со старым каналом» Он останется как кусок памяти и всё такое С ним нечего делать я не буду.

26❤‍🔥7💘4🍌2custom 541838364659367156721🎉1

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

12 Apr 2025, 18:32 UTC969 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну чтож, не думал, что переезд будет так скоро случиться Одна из главных причин почему я решился, это то что мой этот канал Мусор, тут легко потеряться и много воды И я хочу исправить свои ошибки и наконец делать норм оформление и чтобы люди не терялись в канале и могли легко всё найти (конечно канал ещё будет прорабатываться и добавляться что-то) На новом канале уже вышел пост о редизайне Паразитов https://t.me/Un

😭21💘7❤‍🔥42🍌1

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

12 Apr 2025, 14:22 UTC762 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026

По поводу переезда Он будет намного раньше если я кое что доделаю сегодня #рар

😭13💘63🍌1

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

12 Apr 2025, 14:21 UTC701 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#репост ОКАААК

💘8custom 541838364659367156743🍌1

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

12 Apr 2025, 14:21 UTC634 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @brfadgarPhoto

Вероятно, он говорит что-то вроде: «Черт, Фэнг, это отвратительно!» Я рисую это с тех пор, как проснулся. Я доволен результатом!

14❤‍🔥8💘3custom 541838364659367156732😭2🍌1🎉1

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

11 Apr 2025, 05:52 UTC412 views37 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Долгое время я обдумывал одну идею, и наконец-то решился 05.05.( возможно раньше) Будет переезд канала и редизайн АУ паразиты. Инфо посты некоторые не канон и много, что нужно сделать. надеюсь на ваше понимание #рар

🎉13custom 541838364659367156710😭6🔥4💘21❤‍🔥1

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

10 Apr 2025, 21:21 UTC801 views59 reactions24 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😕🌟🌟🌟 🔹💎🌿💎🔸🧡🥹 🔳🔳🔳🔳🔳🔳🔳🔳🔳🔳🔳 Окак

custom 541838364659367156729💘13❤‍🔥10🥰31🎉1👾1💋1

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

10 Apr 2025, 13:19 UTC523 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Скажите что хотите чтоб я нарисовал или типо того, чот идей было много, а по итогу нечего не осталось 🔥 #рар

15🔥6💘42custom 54183836465936715672

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

9 Apr 2025, 09:44 UTC366 views39 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟 🕊🔽💎🧡🕊🔸 🎐 🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄 Не думаю, что закончу эту зарисовку Закину ради прикола

💘16💋8custom 54183836465936715678❤‍🔥3🍓2🔥2

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

9 Apr 2025, 08:50 UTC278 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#репост Сладенький

7💘2🔥21

Signed 👁 Дядя Глэб 👁 #666 #ВернитеЛоботомию #БлендерГлеб

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fpocT_wow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,207,751 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПЕРЕЕЗД” (@fpocT_wow), 78 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fpocT_wow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.