Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Foxy Fabric Update only

Channel

Foxy Fabric Update only

@foxyfabric

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

588subscribers

+313 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003974915358
TypeChannel
Username@foxyfabric
Created10 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/foxyfabric

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

275588431.58 August 2026 — 275 subscribers8 August 2026 — 275 subscribers8 August 2026 — 276 subscribers15 August 2026 — 299 subscribers21 August 2026 — 356 subscribers27 August 2026 — 398 subscribers3 September 2026 — 459 subscribers11 September 2026 — 527 subscribers29 September 2026 — 568 subscribers9 October 2026 — 588 subscribers8 August 20269 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 62 days, net +313. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 228–635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 15:41588+20
29 Sept 2026, 02:17568+41
11 Sept 2026, 15:58527+68
3 Sept 2026, 12:57459+61
27 Aug 2026, 21:54398+42
21 Aug 2026, 06:38356+57
15 Aug 2026, 00:43299+23
8 Aug 2026, 14:26276+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:46275no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:31275first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11186.0%
🥰75.43%
👀64.65%
😱53.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 20:40 UTC419 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hey everyone! Just some quick updates for yall ❤️ We have sent our first batch of teddy version 1.0 out to our Foxy Affiliates. There will be more chances to be an affiliate, do not worry! But for now I selected creators that Ive known a long time. ❤️As soon as I have some more swatch books (hopefully in the next few days) and finish this current list I will allow this chat some opportunity to get stuff early! ❤️Te…

❤25

15 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC611 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Development of the luxury shag. The brown is a howl lux P.S. Some test yards arrived safely. Swatches will be available soon!

❤23👀5😱5

30 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC637 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Good news! Foxy Fabrics Teddy Batch 1 has finished production. More pics soon!!

❤17🥰7👀1

25 Jun 2026, 21:00 UTC702 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Okay here is the ACTUAL Batch 1 colors. The ones with text will be dupes of other colors. We have asked them to copy the sample. We also MIGHT have: Flokati in Black and Cream Beaver in White, Black, Warm Latte, and light blue

❤22

24 Jun 2026, 17:52 UTC497 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

There are discussions going on for Minky, Mochi Minky, and Monster Fur. If you want input on the colors head on over to the group. Please post what colors you want for minky and for monster fur, it can be colors that already exist or colors that you have had trouble finding. Id love any and all input on what you think we should carry! We will have the following: Monster Fur- 4 inch not shaveable. 1 mm stretch moch…

❤5

10 Jun 2026, 22:11 UTC460 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Foxy Fabrics Furs will be available in the UK at launch 🔥 We are incredibly excited to share that we are working with @CarnivCreations to make an affordable way to get Foxy Furs in the UK. This will be an opportunity for Carniv to grow to accommodate more fabric, so please consider supporting them immediately at launch! ⭐️ We will have all shades of teddy and shag! ⭐️ More details to come! ⭐️ UK folks follow @Carni…

❤10

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @foxyfabric. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Foxy Fabric Update only” (@foxyfabric), 588 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxyfabric.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.