Posted without readable text

Channel
Foxy Fabric Update only
@foxyfabric
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
588subscribers
+313 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003974915358 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @foxyfabric |
| Created | 10 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/foxyfabric |
Topic
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 15:41 | 588 | +20 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 568 | +41 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 527 | +68 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 459 | +61 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 398 | +42 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 356 | +57 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 299 | +23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 276 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 275 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 275 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
129 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 111 | 86.0% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 5.43% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 4.65% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 3.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Hey everyone! Just some quick updates for yall ❤️ We have sent our first batch of teddy version 1.0 out to our Foxy Affiliates. There will be more chances to be an affiliate, do not worry! But for now I selected creators that Ive known a long time. ❤️As soon as I have some more swatch books (hopefully in the next few days) and finish this current list I will allow this chat some opportunity to get stuff early! ❤️Te…
❤25
https://x.com/i/status/2082854068494442952
❤9
Development of the luxury shag. The brown is a howl lux P.S. Some test yards arrived safely. Swatches will be available soon!
❤23👀5😱5
Good news! Foxy Fabrics Teddy Batch 1 has finished production. More pics soon!!
❤17🥰7👀1
Okay here is the ACTUAL Batch 1 colors. The ones with text will be dupes of other colors. We have asked them to copy the sample. We also MIGHT have: Flokati in Black and Cream Beaver in White, Black, Warm Latte, and light blue
❤22
There are discussions going on for Minky, Mochi Minky, and Monster Fur. If you want input on the colors head on over to the group. Please post what colors you want for minky and for monster fur, it can be colors that already exist or colors that you have had trouble finding. Id love any and all input on what you think we should carry! We will have the following: Monster Fur- 4 inch not shaveable. 1 mm stretch moch…
❤5
🔥 Foxy Fabrics Furs will be available in the UK at launch 🔥 We are incredibly excited to share that we are working with @CarnivCreations to make an affordable way to get Foxy Furs in the UK. This will be an opportunity for Carniv to grow to accommodate more fabric, so please consider supporting them immediately at launch! ⭐️ We will have all shades of teddy and shag! ⭐️ More details to come! ⭐️ UK folks follow @Carni…
❤10
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @foxyfabric. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Foxy Fabric Update only” (@foxyfabric), 588 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxyfabric.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.