JUST IN: $1,000,000,000 liquidated from the cryptocurrency market in the past 24 hours. @WatcherGuru
๐1๐ค1

Channel
@foxxcall
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002230321114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @foxxcall |
| Description | "Hunting gems, locking profits!" DM to join prv channel @selene_dagoddess |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 July 2024โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/foxxcall |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 24 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 24 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2024 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 11 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 1 | 33.3% | |
| ๐ญ | 1 | 33.3% | |
| ๐ค | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2024 to 5 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
JUST IN: $1,000,000,000 liquidated from the cryptocurrency market in the past 24 hours. @WatcherGuru
๐1๐ค1
Saw it on pump.fun when it's <30k and passed it....probably today's not my lucky day ๐คทโโ๏ธ๐คทโโ๏ธ
๐ญ1
JUST IN: Bitcoin falls under $53,000. ETH : $2111 SOL: $121 ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ
X2 from call
first mama of ito-chan Buy! ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ๐ฆฎ ๐ 0.4 SOL ($68.9) ๐ 2,744,640.35 RIKO ๐ค 6XD41M...1Qt9 | Txn โฌ๏ธ New Holder! ๐ธ Market Cap $24,660 ๐ Chart โซ Trending โณ๏ธ Events ๐ฃ | SOL TRENDING #16
$RIKO Ito-chan is the old name of Neiro before she was adopted by Kabosu-mama and renamed to Neiro. Originally owned by Riko Wako-mama, Ito-chan came from a foster dog house called Chiba-wan. https://www.instagram.com/riko.wako.mama/ https://t.me/RIKO_SOLANA https://x.com/mama_wako_Sol PsG78PSVVSzKCW99WUELWUZVQFsRGFJbwFF9bnffT4T
๐ฆโจ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐โจ ๐ฆ (๐ฅBASE) NeiRei Gambles Channel $NEIREI on BASE. New launch in dip. 58k area. Be safe with entries. Follows Neiro meta. Degen. Dyor https://t.me/neireibase http://neirei.com/ https://dexscreener.com/base/0xdb82c27a53e5027d1fb2a5b26bf9b4141e6a73bb 0xbA69F2C0DEa68C1E7E7dB97671600E122cE57257 ๐ธ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ ๐ฝ๐ช๐ฎ: ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฝ๐ค๐ฉ โ๏ธ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐จ & ๐๐ค๐ค๐ ๐๐ฃ๐: ๐๐ฌ๐ฃ๐๐ง
๐ฆโจ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐โจ ๐ฆ 5x, 870k ๐ฅ $DWOG ๐ฅ ๐ธ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ ๐ฝ๐ช๐ฎ: ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฝ๐ค๐ฉ โ๏ธ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐จ & ๐๐ค๐ค๐ ๐๐ฃ๐: ๐๐ฌ๐ฃ๐๐ง
๐ฆโจ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐โจ ๐ฆ 4.5x, 815k ๐ฅ $DWOG ๐ฅ ๐ธ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ ๐ฝ๐ช๐ฎ: ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฝ๐ค๐ฉ โ๏ธ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐จ & ๐๐ค๐ค๐ ๐๐ฃ๐: ๐๐ฌ๐ฃ๐๐ง
๐ฆโจ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐โจ ๐ฆ 3x, 540k ๐ฅ $dwog ๐ฅ ๐ธ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ ๐ฝ๐ช๐ฎ: ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฝ๐ค๐ฉ โ๏ธ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐จ & ๐๐ค๐ค๐ ๐๐ฃ๐: ๐๐ฌ๐ฃ๐๐ง
๐ฆโจ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐โจ ๐ฆ 3x, 32k $cwog ๐ฅ ๐ธ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ ๐ฝ๐ช๐ฎ: ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฝ๐ค๐ฉ โ๏ธ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐จ & ๐๐ค๐ค๐ ๐๐ฃ๐: ๐๐ฌ๐ฃ๐๐ง
๐ฆโจ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐โจ ๐ฆ 20x, 1.8M ๐ now 1.5M $FWOG ๐ฅ ๐ธ๐๐๐จ๐ฉ ๐ฝ๐ช๐ฎ: ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฝ๐ค๐ฉ โ๏ธ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐จ & ๐๐ค๐ค๐ ๐๐ฃ๐: ๐๐ฌ๐ฃ๐๐ง
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @foxxcall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@foxxcall named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โFOXX GEMS ๐ฆโ (@foxxcall), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxxcall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.