Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

8888

@foureights

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

785subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002390335653
TypeChannel
Username@foureights
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/foureights

Growth

785786785.59 Aug 2026, 21:46 — 786 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 13:42 — 785 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 21:4610 Aug 2026, 13:42
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 785–786 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:42785-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:46786first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 27s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

466 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 545396647138849500010422.3%
8518.2%
❤‍🔥357.51%
custom 5454241186086682213296.22%
custom 5307967476296871887286.01%
💘275.79%
🕊255.36%
💊204.29%
😭204.29%
custom 5298650163223481406194.08%
custom 5368493547001507959132.79%
custom 5454415188096744449122.58%
112.36%
🔥102.15%
🤝91.93%
custom 536874624140237446361.29%
💯40.858%
😇40.858%
🍓30.644%
🫡20.429%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 466reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @foureights. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 March 2026 to 26 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 May 2026, 15:00 UTC929 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. :тT (@tlosost) ✔️Проверить результаты

❤‍🔥9💯43custom 54539664713884950002

14 May 2026, 06:41 UTC≈1,690 views78 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video

MAKE #2016 GREAT AGAIN!

custom 545396647138849500032💘27custom 5368493547001507959113😇3custom 54542411860866822132

4 May 2026, 00:20 UTC≈1,630 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

空の財布、消えたコーヒー、ボタンは笑う。形と色が溶け、影が滴り、世界は液体の迷路になり、意味も存在も溶けて漂う。

💊16custom 5307967476296871887117🍓3

30 Apr 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,570 views47 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

27custom 545441518809674444911custom 53687462414023744636custom 54542411860866822133

26 Apr 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,730 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Circuit bending — вмешательство в электронику, из-за которого система начинает ошибаться. Камера всё ещё “видит”, но собирает изображение из повреждённых данных. Это не фильтр. Это камера, работающая с нарушенной логикой сигнала. Отсюда эти формы и цвета. Любое вмешательство может полностью вывести камеру из строя… или дать такой глитч, который невозможно повторить.

❤‍🔥14custom 530796747629687188763

26 Apr 2026, 14:33 UTC≈7,120 views55 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Розыгрыш на одну кепку MAKE #2016 GREAT AGAIN результат 26.05 18:00

custom 545424118608668221322custom 545396647138849500021❤‍🔥10custom 53684935470015079592

26 Apr 2026, 13:53 UTC≈1,350 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bossfight_dubstepceo

#2016 больше не существует rest in power каждый кто был с нами всё это время огромная любовь мы поменяли рэп в россии и остались там где хотели, я люблю каждого

🕊25😭3🫡2

26 Apr 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,190 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кепка MAKE #2016 GREAT AGAIN RealTree охотничий камуфляж, унисекс Надпись сделана с помощью вышивки 🚬Price: 1999 Sold! 😁Написать в лс @finessery

custom 545396647138849500010custom 54542411860866822132

26 Apr 2026, 13:47 UTC≈1,030 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кепка MAKE #2016 GREAT AGAIN Военный камуфляж, унисекс Надпись сделана с помощью вышивки 🚬Price: 1999 Sold! 😁Написать в лс @finessery

😭5custom 545396647138849500043custom 54544151880967444491

26 Apr 2026, 13:46 UTC980 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кепка MAKE #2016 GREAT AGAIN Серый городской камуфляж, унисекс Надпись сделана с помощью вышивки 🚬Price: 1999 Sold! 😁Написать в лс @finessery

😭8custom 54539664713884950004❤‍🔥2😇1

26 Apr 2026, 13:45 UTC886 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кепка MAKE #2016 GREAT AGAIN Черная, унисекс Надпись сделана с помощью вышивки 🚬Price: 1500 Sold! 😁Написать в лс @finessery

10😭4custom 54539664713884950004🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @foureights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,056,747 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“8888” (@foureights), 785 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foureights.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.