Channel
@founderbtch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,170subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002347350513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @founderbtch |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/founderbtch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 1,170 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 1,169 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 1,169 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,635 |
| Reactions total | 280 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
879 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 513 | 58.4% | |
| 🔥 | 140 | 15.9% | |
| 👍 | 106 | 12.1% | |
| 💯 | 100 | 11.4% | |
| 💩 | 17 | 1.93% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.341% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 879reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В 2013 году я купил 100 биткоинов по $200. Сейчас они стоят больше 6 миллионов долларов 😱 Итого рост в X300 за 13 лет. Вот какие плоды приносит выдержка. А ведь мог продать, когда он стоил $10,000. И когда $72,000. Или даже когда был $115,000. Но нет. Я не такой. Я продал их за $150 в 2014 году. Скоро анонс моего экспертного курса по криптоинвестициям! 🚀💰
😁27🔥16👍9
Как бигтехи кошмарят вас на собеседованиях Успешно пройти секцию по профильным хардам, но смачно опозориться на логической задаче с часами? Классика бигтеха 😆 Автор этой истории побывал на собесе в ❤️ и рассказал всю правду о цирке, который там происходил. Готовьте попкорн! Вита Заебумба | Путь корпората — топовый канал про IT, сферу найма, трешовые собесы и работу в корпорациях. Просто кладезь кулстори не только …
👍5💯4🔥4💩2👎1
#высралТЗ Запускаю в Сити новый стартап по британской модели (буквально вчера вернулся из Лондона). Формат — коворкинг нового типа, где можно работать, а можно заняться сексом со своими коллегами. Вместо опенспейса кровати, вместо переговорки — комната с самой разной атрибутикой. Абонемент — от 4500 рублей в месяц. Называться будет MAZOK Intimate Space. Тарифы: — Junior: доступ к общей зоне, свои простыни — Middle:…
😁34👍6🔥6💩1
Не, херню какую-то сказал. Чушь же полнейшная! Какой же умный человек будет сегодня говорить одно, а завтра другое?! Иди подумай получше и определись уже, гений. Не, ну надо было такую хрень спиздануть 😳
😁31💯9👍3💩1
Я абсолютно согласен со словами Безоса: 💯 «Умные люди постоянно меняют свою точку зрения, соглашаясь с идеями, с которыми были несогласны ещё вчера. И они очень часто оказываются правы, так как не застревают в одной точке зрения, адаптируются и могут посмотреть на задачу с разных сторон». Как же это гениально сказано! #гениальныемысли #МыслиМиллиардера #ЗолотыеСлова #БезосГений #меняйся #ПутьВеликих
😁18👍16💯10
Вчера впервые за 15 лет спустился в метро. С тех пор появился искусственный интеллект, 5G, генная терапия и нейроимпланты, iPhone 4 стал iPhone 18 Pro Max. А вот три состояния предпринимателя остались неизменными. Что-то меняется, а что-то действительно вечно!
😁26👍7💯7🔥6
#богимаркетинга Никогда не доверял японскому автопрому. Ведь настоящий самурай не хвастается размером клинка. Именно поэтому я и предпочитаю более скромные варианты. Например Rolls-Royce Cullinan. Или Ford GT40 1964 года.
😁19💯6🔥6
🤫 Почему богатые люди говорят тихо Заметил паттерн: чем больше у человека денег и власти, тем тише он говорит. Орут обычно те кто хочет казаться важнее, чем есть на самом деле. Обама говорил тихо. Путин и Меркель говорят тихо. Безос и Баффет говорят тихо. А вот наш Григорьич погромче будет :) Но деньги сами по себе не делают голос тише. Тише делает ощущение контроля, защищённости и права не доказывать. Чем устойч…
😁15👍14🔥7👎2💩1
#стояделали Зашел на сайт Volga. Хотел посмотреть, какое очередное говнище чудо выпустили китайские наши инженеры на базе Geely. Открыл. Увидел что сайт сделан на Тильде. Закрыл. Geely под капотом я еще могут понять. Но Тильда — это уже диагноз. Решил, что буду и дальше страдать на своем стареньком Ford GT40 1965 года.
🔥19😁9👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
😁33🔥15👍9
#богимаркетинга Подборка странных бизнесов, про которые думаешь: «Блять, и на этом реально кто-то зарабатывает?!» 1️⃣ Аренда куриц для борьбы с сорняками. 2️⃣ Чел в Америке заработал несколько миллионов долларов, продавая Онлайн курс «Как правильно искать ЙЕТТИ» 3️⃣ Приложение, в котором ты должен заплатит 1$, чтобы посмотреть, сколько людей заплатили 1$, чтобы посмотреть, сколько людей заплатило 1$... 4️⃣ Ну и к…
😁25🔥10👍5
И снова хорошая попытка №2, MAX. Но по-прежнему звучит неубедительно 😀
😁33👍6🔥6💩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @founderbtch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 79,014 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“I’m Founder, bitch” (@founderbtch), 1,170 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/founderbtch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.