Channel
@fotofoxxx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,488subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001281248854 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fotofoxxx |
| Created | 19 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fotofoxxx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 1,488 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 1,490 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 1,491 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 1,497 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 1,497 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
429 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 201 | 46.9% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 13.5% | |
| 🤣 | 37 | 8.62% | |
| 😱 | 25 | 5.83% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 5.36% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 3.96% | |
| 🤯 | 17 | 3.96% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 2.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 2.10% | |
| 🌚 | 9 | 2.10% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 1.63% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.699% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.466% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 429reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2025 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не понимаю откуда у новых проектов такая страсть к публичному объявлению себя убийцами и уничтожителями чего бы то ни было. Убийца Onlyfans! Chaturbate! Instagram! ну и т.п. Будьте умнее, хитрее, изобретательнее, адаптивнее! Приспосабливайтесь и паразитируйте! Берите пример с рыбы-прилипалы, рака-отшельника, пчёлок и бабочек. (А с кордицепса или ленточного червя - не берите).
😁16❤1👍1
Мне кажется, что вебкам-модели в последние годы чувствуют себя такими растерянными потому, что впитанный с детства ответ "снимать штаны и бегать!" на вопрос "что делать?" перестал работать.
😁34
У нас было 5 аккаунтов на чб, 3 на стрипе, куча емейлов, несколько левых доков, бьюти-фильтры, парики, полная линейка фейковых игрушек, и бесконечный запас энергетиков и нервов. Не то чтобы всё это было категорически необходимо для стрима, но если уж собираешься получить промо, то к делу надо подходить серьёзно.
😁27
#ask Всем привет. У меня было 5 аккаунтов на чб и 3 на стрипе. Последнее промо было самым крутым. Какова вероятность что я сделаю новые аккаунты и у меня все будет очень плохо?
😁14
Photo, posted without a caption
💯5❤1🤔1
Хочу обратить внимание, что по техническим причинам тг @paxumlena больше не используется. Пожалуйста, используйте для связи актуальный тг @lenapaxum Имейте ввиду сами, передайте дальше.
❤8❤🔥2🤩1🙏1
Я хотела сделать вам подборку пятничных мемов, однако сегодня ограничусь одним, - но зато каким!
😁31🤣4❤2🔥2
Пора вводить тег #вечнаяклассика под которым я буду иллюстрировать новые проблемы никогда не стареющими цитатами (как это уже было с "Автостопом по Галактике" или с "Каштанкой"). Вот, например, кое-что о сервисах DMCA (и о том, отчего не получается убрать все ссылки одним махом) устами Леонида Соловьева: — И стражники отпустили тебя? Не посадили в подземную тюрьму? — Разве ты не слышал сказки о глупом коте…
👍9❤2❤🔥2
Новая фобия активирована
😱25😁3❤1
Я раньше: не сплю, ведь в интернете кто-то неправ. Я сейчас:
😁26❤🔥5❤1👍1
С интересом (и ведром попкорна) наблюдаю как начинает действовать House Bill 805 в Северной Корее Каролине, часть которого называется "Prevent Sexual Exploitation/Women and Minors" (официально он вступает в силу первого января, но гаечки начали закручивать Прям Щаз). На пальцах: Согласно новым правилам, сайты 18+ (и вебкам, и контент-платформы) должны собирать с моделей отдельные письменные формы согласия для каждог…
🤯17🤬5❤3👎2👍1🙏1
Обойти стороной ежегодный Year in Review от Pornhub дорогая редакция, конечно, не могла. Не пройдите мимо и вы 😯
🤣10🔥3❤1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fotofoxxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🦊 Фотолиса: сиськи и чудеса” (@fotofoxxx), 1,488 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fotofoxxx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.