2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 10:17
101
no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:00
101
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
79.8%
avg views ÷ 101 subscribers
Avg views / post
80.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
15 (27 March 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
403
Reactions total
51
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,000
Videos
≈13
Links
≈120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
168 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5197350061012436657
52
31.0%
custom 5415825426633202840
44
26.2%
custom 5413825479406789631
21
12.5%
custom 5413657760933880470
19
11.3%
🏆
19
11.3%
custom 5415803084213329506
7
4.17%
custom 5192665093506080808
6
3.57%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 15 we hold a reading for · 87%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @forward2past. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ronaldo Luís Nazário de Lima
1998 Merlin England ‘98 World Cup #173
Это не массовый тираж Panini, который был у каждого мальчишки во дворе. Данный стикер из британского альбома Merlin’s Official England '98. Роналдо попал туда, как главная мировая угроза для Англии. Шанс вытащить блестящую фольгированную «призму» иностранного топ-игрока из локального английского пака конца 90-х стремился к нулю. В живых в таком каче…
Lionel Messi
2005 Coca-cola Caps
Chapa Goool Barca
Это коллекционная металлическая крышка от бутылки Coca-Cola 2005 года с изображением юного Лионеля Месси. Она выпущена в Испании в рамках футбольной промо-серии «Chapa Goool» совместно с ФК «Барселона» во время дебютного сезона Месси.
Ronaldo Luís Nazário de Lima
1996 Panini Estrellas Europeas #80
Редкая русская версия, артефакт эпохи зарождения великой легенды. На фото запечатлён совсем молодой Роналдо, ещё до того, как весь мир безоговорочно признал его «Зубастиком» и «Феноменом».
Larry Bird
1984 Star #12
Карточка выпущена по горячим следам триумфального для Бёрда сезона. В сезоне 1983-84 он привел «Бостон Селтикс» к чемпионству, завоевал свою первую награду MVP регулярного сезона и MVP Финала.
Этот сезон положил начало его легендарной серии из трех титулов MVP подряд (1984, 1985, 1986) - достижение, которое среди форвардов в истории НБА принадлежит только ему.
Друзья, всем привет! 👋
Чтобы быть с вами на связи, я решил создать общий чат для общения по теме нашего любимого хобби.
Давайте дискутировать на тему коллекционирования спортивных карточек / наклеек по всем видам спорта, а также не спортивных карточек, билетов, памятных вещей. Делиться своими находками. Обсуждать спортивные события, матчи.
Буду рад вас там видеть
⤵️⤵️⤵️⤵️⤵️⤵️⤵️⤵️⤵️⤵️⤵️
https://t.me/+TlZXK-6y7BFhMj…
Makarov / Larionov / Tretiak
Autograph and Game-Used stick
2021-22 Leaf Lumber Twig Sigs 3 Bronze /15 PSA 9
Сергей Макаров, Игорь Ларионов и Владислав Третьяк — это легендарные советские хоккеисты, все трое включены в Зал хоккейной славы в Торонто и признаны Международной федерацией хоккея (IIHF) величайшими мастерами XX века.
Charles Barkley Slaps Charles Oakley
1994 February 27
America West Arena (Phoenix, AZ)
Suns - 92 vs Knicks - 78
Культовая драка двух «плохих парней».
Чарльз Баркли (звезда «Финикса») и Чарльз Окли (главный тафгай и телохранитель Патрика Юинга в «Никс») имели давнюю личную неприязнь.
Менее чем за минуту до большого перерыва Окли намертво зажал Баркли при попытке пройти под кольцо. Разгоряченный сэр Чарльз не выдержа…
Charles Barkley
Rookie card
1986 Star Court Kings #3
Один из лучших игроков в истории, так и не выигравших чемпионский перстень NBA. Главной преградой на его пути в финалах всегда становился Майкл Джордан и его «Чикаго Буллз».
🏆Самый ценный игрок NBA (MVP) 1993 года.
😎11-кратный участник Матча всех звёзд (All-Star).
🥇Двукратный олимпийский чемпион (1992, 1994) в составе легендарной американской «Dream Team».
👑Член …
Michael Jordan
1990-91 Star Equal #1
«The Silver Season»
Это набор из 16 карточек был выпущен компанией Star Company совместно с брендом сахарозаменителей Equal. Выпуск приурочили к 25-летнему юбилею (серебряному сезону) франшизы «Чикаго Буллз».
Наборы не продавались в привычных розничных магазинах в отдельных паках-бустерах. Они распространялись целиком в одном прозрачном фабричном пакетике (Factory Sealed Poly Ba…
С появлением всё большего количества каналов с распаковками коробок с карточками, да и только, такие каналы просто мёд.
Сегодня автор затронул тему: «Ошибки в коллекционировании карточек». Тема интересная, думаю каждому найдётся над чем задуматься и вы поделитесь своим опытом.
Поддержите автора, любая активность будет приятна 😉
https://youtu.be/VTJmB5jnXtM?si=_oxvxuUtxOUwD5Sv
Isiah Thomas
1985 Star Crunch’n’Munch All-Stars #6
В 1985 году бренд Crunch 'n' Munch проводил совместную акцию с NBA. В каждую пачку карамельного попкорна вкладывали одну случайную коллекционную карточку от компании Star Co.
Компания Star Co. выпустила этот набор специально к Матчу всех звезд НБА 1985 года. Вместо того чтобы печатать карточки всех игроков лиги, они выбрали только 10 главных суперзвезд того сезона,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @forward2past. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 714,169 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
2 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вперёд в прошлое / Коллекционные карточки” (@forward2past), 101 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forward2past.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
