Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Formula 1 archive

Channel

Formula 1 archive

@formula1archivef

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003895168499
TypeChannel
Username@formula1archivef
Created23 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/formula1archivef

Growth

121312.511 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12 subscribers11 August 20261 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 21 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 17:0412-1
12 Aug 2026, 02:1613no change
11 Aug 2026, 05:3013first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4h 25m
Average length
1h 28m

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @formula1archivef. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎥 South Africa Grand Prix 1980 🏁 Full Race 📅 1 Mars 1980 🏆Winner: René Arnoux (Renault) 📍Kyalami—SouthAfrican #F1Archive #1980Season #Round03 #SouthAfricanGP #FullRace

9 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1980 formula one world championship Round 03 🇿🇦 South Africa Grand Prix 1980 📅 1 Mars 1980 #F1Archive #1980Season #Round03 #SouthAfricanGP #RaceInfo

9 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏎 Qualifying Results 1. 🇫🇷 Jean-Pierre Jabouille — Renault — 1:10.000 2. 🇫🇷 René Arnoux — Renault — 1:10.210 3. 🇧🇷 Nelson Piquet — Brabham Ford — 1:11.870 4. 🇫🇷 Jacques Laffite — Ligier Ford — 1:11.880 5. 🇫🇷 Didier Pironi — Ligier Ford — 1:12.110 6. 🇦🇷 Carlos Reutemann — Williams Ford — 1:12.150 7. 🇫🇷 Patrick Depailler — Alfa Romeo — 1:12.160 8. 🇦🇺 Alan Jones — Williams Ford — 1:12.230 9. 🇿🇦 Jody Scheckter — Ferrari

9 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏁 Race Results 🥇 🇫🇷 René Arnoux — Renault 🥈 🇫🇷 Jacques Laffite — Ligier Ford 🥉 🇫🇷 Didier Pironi — Ligier Ford 4⃣🇧🇷 Nelson Piquet — Brabham Ford 5⃣🇦🇷 Carlos Reutemann — Williams Ford 6⃣🇩🇪 Jochen Mass — Arrows Ford 🏎Fastest Lap: 🇫🇷 René Arnoux — Renault #F1Archive #1980Season #Round03 #SouthAfricanGP #RaceResults

9 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Drivers' Championship 1⃣ 1. 🇫🇷 René Arnoux — Renault — 18 pts 2⃣ 2. 🇦🇺 Alan Jones — 13 pts 3⃣ 3. 🇧🇷 Nelson Piquet — 9 pts 4️⃣ 4. 🇫🇷 Didier Pironi — 7 pts 5️⃣ 5. 🇫🇷 Jacques Laffite — 6 pts 6️⃣ 6. 🇮🇹 Elio de Angelis — 6 pts 🏆 Constructors' Championship 1⃣ 1. Renault — 18 pts 2⃣ 2. Williams Ford — 15 pts 3⃣ 3. Ligier Ford — 13 pts 4️⃣ 4. Brabham Ford — 9 pts 5️⃣ 5. Lotus Ford — 6 pts 6️⃣ 6. Fittipaldi Ford — 4 p

2 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC74 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎥 Brazilian Grand Prix 1980 🏁 Full Race 📅 27 January 1980 🏆Winner: René Arnoux (Renault) 📍 Interlagos – São Paulo 🇧🇷 #F1Archive #1980Season #Round02 #BrazilianGP #FullRace

2 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1980formula one world championship Round 02 🏁 Brazilian Grand Prix 1980 📅 27 January 1980 #F1Archive #1980Season #Round02 #BrazilianGP #RaceInfo

2 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC22 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏎 Qualifying Results 🥇 Jean-Pierre Jabouille — Renault — 2:21.400 🥈 Didier Pironi — Ligier-Ford — 2:21.650 🥉 Gilles Villeneuve — Ferrari — 2:22.17 4️⃣ Carlos Reutemann — Williams-Ford — 2:22.260 5️⃣ Jacques Laffite — Ligier-Ford — 2:22.300 6️⃣ René Arnoux — Renault — 2:22.310 7️⃣ Elio de Angelis — Lotus-Ford 8️⃣ Jody Scheckter — Ferrari 9️⃣ Nelson Piquet — Brabham-Ford 🔟 Alan Jones — Williams-Ford #F1Archive #1980Sea

2 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC18 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏁 Race Results 🥇 René Arnoux — Renault 🥈 Elio de Angelis — Lotus-Ford 🥉 Alan Jones — Williams-Ford 4️⃣ Didier Pironi — Ligier-Ford 5️⃣ Alain Prost — McLaren-Ford 6️⃣ Riccardo Patrese — Arrows-Ford 🏎 Fastest Lap Nelson Piquet — Brabham-Ford #F1Archive #1980Season #Round02 #BrazilianGP #RaceResults

2 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Drivers' Championship 1️⃣ Alan Jones 🇦🇺 — 13 pts 2️⃣ René Arnoux 🇫🇷 — 9 pts 3️⃣ Nelson Piquet 🇧🇷 — 6 pts 4️⃣ Elio de Angelis 🇮🇹 — 6 pts 5️⃣ Keke Rosberg 🇫🇮 — 4 pts 6️⃣ Derek Daly 🇮🇪 — 3 pts 6️⃣ Didier Pironi 🇫🇷 — 3 pts 6️⃣ Alain Prost 🇫🇷 — 3 pts 🏆 Constructors' Championship 1️⃣ Williams-Ford — 13 pts 2️⃣ Renault — 9 pts 3️⃣ Brabham-Ford — 6 pts 4️⃣ Lotus-Ford — 6 pts 5️⃣ Fittipaldi-Ford — 4 pts 6️⃣ Tyrrell-Ford

27 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC49 views2 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎥 1980 Argentine Grand Prix 🏁 Full Race 📅 13 January 1980 🏆 Winner: Alan Jones (Williams-Ford) 📍 Buenos Aires, Argentina #F1Archive #1980Season #Round01 #ArgentineGP #FullRace

2

27 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC44 views2 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Drivers' Championship 1️⃣ Alan Jones 🇦🇺 — 9 pts 2️⃣ Nelson Piquet 🇧🇷 — 6 pts 3️⃣ Keke Rosberg 🇫🇮 — 4 pts 4️⃣ Derek Daly 🇮🇪 — 3 pts 5️⃣ Bruno Giacomelli 🇮🇹 — 2 pts 6️⃣ Alain Prost 🇫🇷 — 1 pt 🏆 Constructors' Championship 1️⃣ Williams-Ford — 9 pts 2️⃣ Brabham-Ford — 6 pts 3️⃣ Fittipaldi-Ford — 4 pts 4️⃣ Tyrrell-Ford — 3 pts 5️⃣ Alfa Romeo — 2 pts 6️⃣ McLaren-Ford — 1 pt #F1Archive #1980Season #Round01 #ArgentineGP #S

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @formula1archivef. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Formula 1 archive” (@formula1archivef), 12 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/formula1archivef.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.