Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

осколки чувств.

@forg1m

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

719subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002072586466
TypeChannel
Username@forg1m
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/forg1m

Growth

719720719.57 Aug 2026, 13:16 — 720 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:15 — 720 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:53 — 719 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:168 Aug 2026, 05:53
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 719–720 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:53719-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:15720no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:16720first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
139.4%
avg views ÷ 719 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,000
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held20 (9 October 202525 July 2026)
Views total2,004
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,306 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 526954804464636875582635.8%
custom 534830640614135386380434.9%
custom 528095116563738423467629.3%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 20 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @forg1m. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 October 2025 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC954 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

she's too busy waiting languidly from afar.

custom 528095116563738423410custom 52695480446463687556

25 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,050 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 528095116563738423410custom 52695480446463687554

1 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,870 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

успех - дитя смелости.

custom 528095116563738423418custom 52695480446463687559

25 May 2026, 20:23 UTC≈3,640 views70 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

многие люди навсегда останутся в наших сердцах, но уже никогда в наших жизнях. and that's okay. even if it's sad.

custom 526954804464636875530custom 528095116563738423421custom 534830640614135386319

19 Apr 2026, 06:09 UTC≈5,030 views81 reactionsread 8 August 2026

потерянное время никогда не вернётся. оно исчезает безвозвратно, оставляя лишь сожаления и горькое осознание того, что могло бы быть.

custom 526954804464636875533custom 528095116563738423424custom 534830640614135386324

31 Mar 2026, 22:01 UTC≈5,000 views86 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

любить – значит защищать от боли, а не становиться её причиной.

custom 526954804464636875543custom 534830640614135386326custom 528095116563738423417

25 Mar 2026, 23:02 UTC≈4,930 views84 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

чтобы мир вокруг нас изменился, достаточно изменить свои мысли.

custom 526954804464636875540custom 534830640614135386330custom 528095116563738423414

11 Mar 2026, 14:17 UTC≈5,320 views77 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

никогда не оглядывайся назад.

custom 534830640614135386341custom 526954804464636875528custom 52809511656373842348

15 Feb 2026, 22:01 UTC≈6,040 views84 reactionsread 8 August 2026

время не лечит. попросту не умеет. оно лишь стирает память и притупляет чувства. это обезболивающее, а не лекарство. мы вырабатываем привычку к этому состоянию, приучаемся к тишине, где раньше звучал смех, к пустоте, где раньше были руки. время не исцеляет, а заставляет приспособляться к новым условиям существования.

custom 534830640614135386346custom 526954804464636875531custom 52809511656373842347

30 Jan 2026, 18:22 UTC≈6,540 views75 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

просто уходи и наблюдай, как горит моё сердце. как вспыхивают языки пламени, облизывая каждую трещинку, каждую прорезь, оставленную твоим безразличием. каждый удар сердца отзывается болезненным эхом в пустой груди, напоминая о том, что когда-то здесь жила надежда.

custom 534830640614135386335custom 526954804464636875521custom 528095116563738423419

11 Jan 2026, 13:16 UTC≈6,810 views118 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ревность – чувство, которое туманит разум, лишает рассудка. расползается, словно яд, по всему телу, парализуя, лишая покоя, вызывая лишь одно – страх. страх потери того, кого любишь всем сердцем.

custom 528095116563738423452custom 526954804464636875533custom 534830640614135386333

9 Jan 2026, 22:00 UTC≈4,190 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

.

  1. здоровая любовь.61%
  2. созависимость.39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 528095116563738423434custom 526954804464636875520custom 534830640614135386317

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @forg1m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jan 2026, 22:00 UTCAnonymous Poll423 voters

.

  1. здоровая любовь.61%
  2. созависимость.39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 280,937 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“осколки чувств.” (@forg1m), 719 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forg1m.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.