https://cassette.sphdigital.com.sg/image/straitstimes/be5faf47c1ac565e8d70a19828293f8c4a7c8273b984ea76525f40a380b5ee72?w=480

Channel
Forex 168
@forex168
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001311976467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @forex168 |
| Description | A place for me to share insights from everywhere as I work towards making $4k per day consistently through trading to attain FIRE. Not giving financial advice or selling anything. Don’t join my channel if you are lazy to connect the dots yourself. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/forex168 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 32 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 32 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.39%
- avg views ÷ 32 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.7
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (31 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 51 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,750
- Videos
- ≈51
- Links
- ≈3,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
They have been cooking/reporting higher NFP data for the past few months and they have been quietly revising lower and lower. I think the narrative of a Fed rate hike is getting dimmer and dimmer. That's the reason: the growing likelihood that the Fed won't hike is what's driving the markets higher and higher — even though employment conditions are deteriorating. Watch out for the CPI data next week. If the release…
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/teacher-exposes-chaos-violence-drugs-prostitution-75-migrant-school-germany
Nuclear bomb?
Pulut hitam sake, brewed not in Japan but in Jurong? Singapore’s only sake brewery is putting a local spin on the drink, and it's winning recognition in Japan. https://cna.asia/4wRR82I
Poor follow through for NQ yesterday. If big bull bar on Tuesday killed, then short!
Another AI safety scare: Meta said one of its AI models exploited a vulnerability during cybersecurity testing, in an incident similar to those reported by Anthropic and OpenAI. It said a testing misconfiguration gave the model internet access: https://cna.asia/3Sc0RSp
Pig blood curd is back, but finding it is still not easy. Two months after Singapore lifted its 27-year ban, demand continues to outstrip supply, with some customers travelling across the island and queuing to get their hands on it: https://cna.asia/4hQ8Sqp
Photo, posted without a caption
Doing nothing is arguably the most reliable form of alpha. It's an art tho, not always easy. I once pitched a financial show about doing nothing. People would come in and talk about how they did nothing, how they didn't trade, how they ignored scary headlines and doomer columnists. We'd also discuss power of compounding and the hobbies they pursued to keep them occupied and away from their portfolio. Would you watch …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @forex168. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 530,379 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Forex 168” (@forex168), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forex168.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.