Channel
@foreveirj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001643223950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @foreveirj |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/foreveirj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 65 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 65 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 9 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
81 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 49 | 60.5% | |
| 🤨 | 10 | 12.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 9.88% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 6.17% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 4.94% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 4.94% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2023 to 28 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У Телеграм обновление! Что нового: — В тексте теперь можно выделить цитату; — при ответе на комментарий можно цитировать часть сообщения; — предосмотр ссылок обновился; — пользователи с premium теперь могут выбирать цвет своего юзернейма в чатах; — истории можно перематывать и включать вспышку во время записи селфи.
🤡18🖕4
@onetimeusername празднует свой день рождения. ✅ Кто не в курсе — это официальных аккаунт Павла Дурова. Настоятельно рекомендую всем тем, кто заработал с Telegram хоть какую-нибудь сумму, оторвать процент от нее и отдать вожаку. Это заряд на позитив, положительные эмоции, и просто поддержка того самого человека, который открыл для нас новые перспективы. Ведь, бизнес в Telegram позволяет создать приятный Roi на са…
🤡6🎉5🤨1
🤖 Революция в мире постинга @posted - это первый и единственный бот с возможностью создавать, редактировать и откладывать посты с ⭐️ premium-эмодзи Сделайте ваш проект поистине уникальным благодаря Posted.
👍7🤡3🤨1😁1
Правила хорошего Тона
🤡5🤨1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🤡2🤨1
На какой тип канала закупаете вы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤡2❤1🤨1
Вывод: 1. Хотите получить больше охвата и меньше отписок в будущем? - закупайте на открытый канал. 2. Хотите максимально, с пользой использовать весь бюджет и снизить риски? - закупайте на закрытый(частный), с заявками.
🤡2🤨1
3. Частные. на заявках. Плюсы: А. Автоприветствие. Пожалуйста сейчас это самый эффективный тип Telegram канала - с него можно переливать траффик закупа с помощью автоприветствия - сообщения, которое приходит человеку после отправки заявки в канал. Это позволяет делить бюджет и переливать траффик либо в другой канал, либо в ботом, или в другой сервис. Б. Сбор базы. Так же появляется возможность собирать базу, с помо…
🤡2🤨1
2.1. Частные каналы. Без заявок. Плюсы: А. Просмотры 👀 Первые 15 минут в таком типе канала, можно сидеть не подписываясь, а значит и просмотры будут примерно такие же, как и в публичном. Б. Подписчики После 15 минут просмотра канала, Telegram предлагает подписаться на канал и при повторном нажатии на ссылку - в канал уже не попасть, без подписки. А значит увеличивается количество подписчиков, за закуп. В. Отслежив…
🤡2👍1🤨1
1. Публичный, плюсы: 1. Доступность: Для просмотра канала, не нужно подписываться - а значит количество просмотров при рекламе будет значительно выше чем у закрытого. 2.Поиск Только публичные каналы отображаются в поиске. У вас будет возможность потянуть трафик с него. (Конечно же канал должен быть большой, иметь качественные ключевые слова, правильную ссылку и хороший возраст канала.) 3. Низкие отписки после рекл…
🤡2🤨1
На какой тип канала сейчас лучше всего закупать? В Telegram на данный момент существует два типа каналов: - Публичный - Частный (делится в свою очередь) А. С заявками на вступление. Б. Без заявок на вступление.
🤡2❤1🤨1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @foreveirj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На какой тип канала закупаете вы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2023 to 28 October 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,059,238 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@foreveirj named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Forever Теперь в TELEGRAM !” (@foreveirj), 65 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foreveirj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.