File, posted without a caption
🔥5👍1💊1🤯1

Channel
@forbes30
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
759subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001502413007 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @forbes30 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2021 and 11 December 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/forbes30 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 759 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 760 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 760 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 11 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
328 reactions across 10 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 35.1% | |
| 👎 | 46 | 14.0% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 12.2% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 8.23% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 7.93% | |
| 🤔 | 25 | 7.62% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 4.27% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 3.05% | |
| 💅 | 6 | 1.83% | |
| 🙈 | 6 | 1.83% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 1.22% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.915% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.305% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.305% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.305% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.305% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 328reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2022 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @forbes30. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 December 2022 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
File, posted without a caption
🔥5👍1💊1🤯1
Увольнение из вуза (часть 1) Прежде чем ответить на этот вопрос, логичнее сначала объяснить, зачем я вообще трудоустроился в вуз. На самом деле у меня была понятная цель и задача. В тот момент я был частным репетитором. Основной поток учеников шёл с Профи — были времена, когда у них ещё не было конских тарифов, — а потом хорошо заработало сарафанное радио. Был даже случай, когда один ученик за месяц привёл из своег…
❤14🤔7❤🔥6
На память 😁 дата скрина: 25.01.2022
🤯10👍6🔥4❤3💅1🤔1
Signed Тарасов Олег
Видео про которое говорил выше (для очень умных, на английском вот ссылка)
❤5🔥3👍1💅1
Signed Тарасов Олег
Одновременно с этим я увольняюсь с работы из вуза, немного со скандалом. Знаете причину увольнения? Встреча с Путиным. Об этом позже ещё расскажу. Это был какой-то сюр, ей богу. Но было очень символично, когда я в свой день рождения (7 февраля) писал заявление по собственному, понимая, что сейчас случится сделка и много работы будет в проекте. Но сделка по итогу сорвалась… Благо сейчас я довольно твёрдо стою на нога…
❤21❤🔥16🔥4😁2💅1💯1
Signed Тарасов Олег
Ключевым таким переломным моментом стал февраль 2022 года. Очень многое налажилось в этот месяц. Небольшая предыстория: в декабре по версии Сколково проект становится топ-3 перспективным стартапом, выиграв крупный всероссийский конкурс от Минобрнауки. Я на тот момент студент МФТИ и аспирант МИСИС, а также помощник проректора по учебной работе другого московского вуза. И параллельно шли переговоры об инвестициях в пр…
❤7🤔6🙈6❤🔥2🔥2💅1😁1
Signed Тарасов Олег
После стольких лет… Есть классное видео выступления Стива Джобса перед студентами Стэнфорда, где он рассказал про 3 истории. Очень рекомендую посмотреть. И ключевая, на мой взгляд, история — про «соединение точек». Суть истории проста: в жизни каждого человека есть события [точки], которые могут стать переломными, вне зависимости от того, позитивное это событие или негативное. И понять, что это событие стало ключевы…
❤12👍5🔥4❤🔥2💅2🤝2🤷♂1😁1
Signed Тарасов Олег
Мне очень нужен Джаред, или человек, который будет очень похож на Джареда. Где такого можно найти?
❤43👎30🤔9😁6🥴3
Signed Тарасов Олег
Последнее над чем я буду париться это логотип (Часть 4) Мы продолжаем с командой работу над оформлением. С конечным вариантом пока не определились. Но могу показать промежуточные работы, наши наброски Буду рад почитать ваши мнения. Что добавить, поменять
👍27❤10👎8🔥5😍4
Signed Тарасов Олег
Может я конечно чего-то не понимаю. Это вот новая компания от Сбера. Типо маркетплейса по курсам. Но их логотип это же жесть. 😬 И это компания с бюджетом
👎8🤯3🤔2😱1
Signed Тарасов Олег
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @forbes30. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 247,192 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стартап. Forbes “30 до 30»” (@forbes30), 759 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forbes30.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.