Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 100 days, net +287. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,368–7,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 00:47
7,707
+34
9 Nov 2026, 10:35
7,673
-2
6 Nov 2026, 05:59
7,675
-4
2 Nov 2026, 19:40
7,679
-3
30 Oct 2026, 08:55
7,682
-3
27 Oct 2026, 00:16
7,685
-1
24 Oct 2026, 07:05
7,686
+11
21 Oct 2026, 15:27
7,675
+16
18 Oct 2026, 08:16
7,659
+50
15 Oct 2026, 03:09
7,609
+8
11 Oct 2026, 13:22
7,601
+8
5 Oct 2026, 08:54
7,593
+2
27 Sept 2026, 05:39
7,591
+35
18 Sept 2026, 04:39
7,556
-1
14 Sept 2026, 06:37
7,557
+1
10 Sept 2026, 17:39
7,556
+2
5 Sept 2026, 21:56
7,554
+23
29 Aug 2026, 11:13
7,531
+60
26 Aug 2026, 17:44
7,471
+15
23 Aug 2026, 08:15
7,456
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.8%
avg views ÷ 7,707 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
57 (30 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
27,602
Reactions total
504
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,470
Videos
≈97
Links
≈1,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 11s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,386 reactions across 53 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
532
38.4%
🔥
211
15.2%
👍
206
14.9%
❤🔥
118
8.51%
👏
95
6.85%
🥰
82
5.92%
⚡
43
3.10%
✍
21
1.52%
🎉
18
1.30%
🤩
15
1.08%
💔
9
0.649%
😍
8
0.577%
🤓
6
0.433%
🤝
6
0.433%
🏆
5
0.361%
💘
5
0.361%
👌
1
0.072%
💋
1
0.072%
💯
1
0.072%
🕊
1
0.072%
2 further kinds
2
0.144%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,477 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✅Стартовал конкурс «Целевые капиталы: стратегия роста»
Приглашаем к участию организации, которые планируют создать или продолжить развивать целевой капитал. Подать заявку можно до 15 февраля 2027 года на портале Фонда.
По итогам отбора 20 организаций-финалистов получат до 25 млн рублей каждая на срок до трех лет. Если организация успешно реализует и защитит проект, минимум 10 млн рублей она сможет направить в свой …
⚡️Итоги десятой волны конкурса #Мынасвязи
В октябре мы выбрали два проекта победителей Стипендиальной программы, которые поддержим в номинации «Единомышленники».
🔵 «Две купешки. Маршрут связей» — документальная экспедиция восьми стипендиатов по маршруту Томск — Екатеринбург — Ярославль — Москва. В ходе экспедиции они встретятся с победителями конкурсов Фонда и снимут фильм об их проектах.
🔵 «Голос сообщества» объе…
➡️ «Компетенции в общественно-значимой деятельности: код активации»
20 ноября проведем экспертную сессию на Национальном форуме дополнительного образования «Код компетенций будущего» НИУ ВШЭ. Приглашаем профессиональное сообщество присоединиться к разговору!
Вместе с представителями НКО, музеев, фондов и ресурсных центров, а также разработчиками образовательных продуктов обсудим, чем отличаются компетенции специали…
⏰ Завершаем год спортивно
Что?
Ежегодная конференция Фонда Потанина «Сила спорта» при поддержке Национальных проектов России и государственной программы «Спорт России»
Где?
Москва, креативное пространство «Новый Манеж», Георгиевский переулок, 3, стр.3
Когда?
Пятница и суббота, 4-5 декабря
📌 В программе — экспертные дискуссии, спортивный фестиваль, интерактивный квест, документальный киноальманах «Дистанция ближня…
📽️ Где смотреть наши фильмы?
В ноябре увидеть на большом экране можно не только новый фильм о социальном спорте — «Дистанция ближняя», но и киноисследование о работе с индустриальным наследием — «Мануфактура культуры».
Расписание показов:
13 ноября (пт) на Неделе уральского кино в Екатеринбурге погрузимся в истории людей, которые выбрали спорт как способ преодоления собственных страхов и внутренних барьеров. Нача…
🤩Открываем конкурс «Спорт для всех»
Принять участие приглашаем некоммерческие организации с проектами в сфере социального спорта. В этом году в конкурсе появилась новая номинация «Спорт и технологические инновации». Все подробности и условия участия — на странице конкурса.
🤩Подать заявку можно в личном кабинете до 15 декабря 2026 года.
В помощь заявителю:
🤩Телеграм-канал
🤩Сообществе ВКонтакте
🤩Консультации — на п…
📍🌨 Командировка в Екатеринбург
Город на Исети подарил встречи с первым снегом и реализованными с поддержкой Фонда проектами.
*️⃣Екатерина Юркова рассказала о «Лаборатории искренних историй „Линии сердца“», реализованной в партнерстве с АНО «Благое дело». Через телесные практики, сторителлинг и арт-терапию участники – взрослые с нейроотличиями – выражали и проживали эмоции. Из этих разговоров, историй и творческих …
📍Идет прием заявок на стипендиальный конкурс
Пока вы готовите заявку и обдумываете, как лучше представить свои достижения, предлагаем почитать интервью с Кристиной Логиновой — студенткой Кемеровского государственного университета, победительницей стипендиального конкурса и волонтером Школы Фонда Потанина этого года. Кристина делится опытом участия в конкурсе и впечатлениями от победы.
Желаем удачи и ждем вас завтра…
🗓 Дайджест наших событий
Рассказываем о недавних командировках и не только ⬇️
В Красноярске побывали на Международном спортивном форуме «Россия — спортивная держава». На деловых сессиях и в выставочной зоне встретились с авторами поддержанных нами проектов, которые развивают массовый, семейный и инклюзивный спорт. А еще познакомились с проектом Никиты Вдовина «Клево с папой» — спортивная рыбалка для пап и детей.
В…
🔭 «Ученые дамы»: цикл показов и дискуссий в «Чтиво-доме»
В рамках параллельной программы выставки «Ученые дамы. Наука без разрешения» (открыта в Музее Москвы до 10 ноября) прошли специальные показы «Ученых дам» – с участием героев и авторов проекта.
Ученые, победительницы конкурсов Стипендиальной программы Владимира Потанина – астрофизик Александра Иванова, зоолог Ксения Табачникова, микробиологи Дана Мамий, Екатер…
🏛 Музейный замысел обретает форму
Как превратить идею в музейный проект и найти способ рассказать о ней посетителю? Этим вопросам была посвящена вторая «Лаборатория замыслов Л.Ю. Копылова», прошедшая 25–27 октября в Ярославском художественном музее и музее-заповеднике Н.А. Некрасова «Карабиха».
Двадцать музейных специалистов из 16 регионов России изучали принципы и методы Леонида Юрьевича Копылова — музейного проек…
📢 Стартовал конкурс «Профессиональное развитие — 2027»
Приглашаем сотрудников вузов, НКО, музейных организаций и организаций, развивающих социальный спорт. Поддержка в конкурсе позволит освоить новые навыки или поделиться опытом с профессиональным сообществом.
Заявки на I цикл будут приниматься до 2 декабря 2026 на портале. Всего в сезоне 2026/27 состоятся три цикла конкурса с подведением итогов после каждого из н…
🔥11❤8👍7👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @fondpotanin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fondpotanin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Культурная волна. Гранты ПФКИ @pfci_grants · 20,722 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026
Фонд президентских грантов @presidentialgrants · 20,258 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 September 2026
Капитан Грантов @cptgrantov · 69,643 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фонд Потанина” (@fondpotanin), 7,707 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fondpotanin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.