4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 737–746 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 15:56
738
-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:34
741
-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:02
745
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:13
745
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31m 21s
Average length
6m 16s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
128 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
62
48.4%
🌭
25
19.5%
🎉
18
14.1%
🔥
15
11.7%
😱
5
3.91%
😭
1
0.781%
🤣
1
0.781%
🥰
1
0.781%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2025 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Обновление MegaFPBot 1.5 — уже в эфире!
Это pre-release — мы выкатили обновление раньше времени, чтобы вы могли попробовать первыми. Наша команда активно тестирует прямо сейчас. Если что-то пошло не так — просто напишите нам, мы разберёмся быстро 🧪
Что нового:
(Разверни данный блок для просмотра ПОЛНОГО списка нововведений)
🚫 Чёрный список покупателей
Заблокируй нежелательных покупателей по нику. Бот не ответит, н…
🚀 Автоматизация PlayerOK и FunPay без сложностей
Если тебе нужна автоматизация, но:
∟ боты стоят по 1000₽/мес.
∟ нужно держать включённый ПК
∟ или поднимать свой сервер и разбираться в гайдах
— это лишний геморрой.
Я сделал своё решение:
👤 MegaFPBot — один бот сразу для PlayerOK + FunPay
Управление полностью через Telegram.
🔘 Внутри уже есть:
автовыдача, автоподнятие, автоответы, автоподтверждение, автовосстановле…
Временная скидка на @FunokBot.
Первые 5 человек могут получить полный доступ ВСЕГО за 25$.
Для оплаты по СБП - @yanewcom
Что входит:
— полный доступ к базе данных (10k+ сообщений, десятки топиков, база регулярно обновляется);
— встроенный AI-поиск по базе данных;
— бесплатные токены для тестирования AI;
— доступ навсегда, без подписок и продлений.
AI работает в демо-режиме на облегчённой модели. Основная ценность…
🔥 Вот такое обновление ждёт всех вас в @AutoFlipGiftsBot уже скоро)
🖼 Пока что разрабатываю режим "Листингов" и работаю над дизайном. Бот получит новую эру развития, давая всем, кто занимается флиппингом подарков, ещё больше возможностей.
💰 Цены также изменятся, но с выходом нового обновления сделаю скидку на время, так что приобрести такую сладость можно будет по совсем низкой цене!
Заказать бота
Написать лично
С…
🚀 Привет. Канал снова в работе.
Долгое время здесь не было активности — за это время канал был полностью переработан и теперь используется как общая площадка нашей команды, которую мы собрали вместе с Лео Бруни.
Здесь будет выходить:
— 📢 дубли всех ключевых обновлений по нашим ботам (как из моего канала, так и частично из канала Лео);
— ⚙️ уведомления об изменениях, ценах и функционале;
— 📊 рекомендации и разборы п…
🔥 ПОДРОБНОЕ видео по обновлению бота!
Основные моменты:
00:00 — кратко про обновление и что изменилось
00:55 — новые настройки (минимальная разница в %, минимальная разница в TON, максимальный банк и т.д.)
02:48 — проверка истории продаж (медиана последних сделок)
04:55 — настройка по флору на разных маркетах
07:10 — фильтры по активности и медиане продаж
09:48 — убрали связку Old-Tonnel (слишком рискованная)
10:20 …
многие также спрашивали про мои настройки в боте, ловите ⭐️
буду любые вопросы / сомнения: пишите @yanewcom постараюсь ответить как можно скорее
Бот: @AutoFlipGiftsBot
🔥 Вот и настало долгожданное обновление!
💡 В боте теперь доступна интеграция с Portals и полностью новая система анализа подарков.
Теперь сделки ищутся с 100% гарантированной прибылью — учитываются цена, флор и множество параметров.
⚠️ На новой системе сигналов меньше, зато каждая сделка максимально выгодная.
При этом старый режим тоже остался — можно пользоваться им без ограничений.
📊 Для новичков — только надёжн…
❤2🌭2🎉2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fomogift1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2025 to 19 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 318,487 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@fomogift1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@starsbot named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кряк Projects” (@fomogift1), 738 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fomogift1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.