3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 958–959 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 00:48
958
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:07
958
-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:57
959
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
96.7%
avg views ÷ 958 subscribers
Avg views / post
927
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (29 June 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
9,265
Reactions total
143
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
100
Links
137
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
302 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
59
19.5%
😁
50
16.6%
🤝
48
15.9%
❤
41
13.6%
🤣
25
8.28%
👍
24
7.95%
🤡
21
6.95%
🫡
9
2.98%
👏
8
2.65%
👌
4
1.32%
🤓
3
0.993%
👎
2
0.662%
✍
1
0.331%
❤🔥
1
0.331%
🌭
1
0.331%
💊
1
0.331%
🗿
1
0.331%
😭
1
0.331%
😱
1
0.331%
🦄
1
0.331%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fomo_traffic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вот это сраный результат залива с аккаунтов на картах которым я почти убил наше приложение.
Чтобы было понятно: нативные приложение айос14+ можно лить только с 24 кампаний в каждой максимум по 5 адсетов тотал. То есть в купе со всех аккаунтов. Казалось бы, 24 кампашки, это же дохрена, можно выключить старые кампании и лимит обновится, но есть нюанс.
До того как я начал лить с агентов, я где-то 3 месяца лил сам с би…
Живем! Больше двух недель головной боли закончились успехом, давайте расскажу что произошло.
У нас забанило девелопер с концами, без него лить нативными айос прилами (продвижение приложения) — нельзя, остается только лить через ссылку апсфлаер, что мы и пробовали.
До того как мы нашли нынешнюю связку, мы пробовали и так, и так. И всегда результаты залива нативной прилы были на голову лучше. Сейчас после бана девело…
Разбанили! Боже храни коррупцию! Стоило 1000$ и три дня ужасной сушки головы, но все-таки разбанили мне девелопер. Совет всем на будущее: ВСЕГДА СТРАХУЙТЕ СВОИ ПРИЛЫ МИНИМУМ НА 10 СОЦЕВ ФБ!
Иначе как последний лох (как я), будете отлистывать нормальную котлету за исправление своего косяка.
Кстати контакт коррумпированного модера продам за 500$ максимум в 5 рук, разбанивает практически все что только можно и не толь…
Если что я жив здоров, у нас забанили фб девелопер с нашей фб прилой. Пробовали заливать по ссылке с эпсфлаера — результаты даже не рядом с нативным заливом прилы фб, хотя крео те же.
Сейчас ждём продажного модера фб, вроде как должен разбанить и полетим как раньше, так что не теряйте, я тут.
АГЕНТСКИЕ АККАУНТЫ FB 3%
МОЙ КАНАЛ | ПОДПИШИСЬ
МОЙ ЧАТИК | ВСТУПАЙ
Короче была залупа. Средний результат это залив по избранным странам. Идите в сраку, кажется я все-таки не таргетолог и не маркетолог, надо чтобы ФБ думал за меня. А когда я думаю сам — получается залупа.
АГЕНТСКИЕ АККАУНТЫ FB 3%
МОЙ КАНАЛ | ПОДПИШИСЬ
МОЙ ЧАТИК | ВСТУПАЙ
Попробовал подключить MCP ФБ к клоду, давайте расскажу. MCP Meta Ads — это такой "мостик" между Claude и рекламным кабинетом ФБ. Через него клод может анализировать кампании, креативы, аудитории и даже вносить изменения — прямо в диалоге, не заходя в интерфейс Ads Manager.
По факту ток звучит сложно, нужно пару раз нажать кнопку "войти через фейсбук" и оно само все сделает для тебя. Важный момент, что клод должен бы…
Ооооо!!! Очень прикольно! Не видел этого раньше: теперь можно показывать рекламу только для тех кто уже установил прилу \ только для тех кто еще НЕ установил \ для всех.
Пространство для маневра расширяется, стиснув зубы едем дальше.
АГЕНТСКИЕ АККАУНТЫ FB 3%
МОЙ КАНАЛ | ПОДПИШИСЬ
МОЙ ЧАТИК | ВСТУПАЙ
Баны конечно дали хороший подзатыльник. Забанился весь БМ на котором были кампашки которые впервые за всю мою жизнь полностью прошли обучение и стабильно давали депы до 60$. Досадно, но мы не расстраиваемся.
А расстраиваемся мы потому что забанился БМ в котором была наша ФБ прила. И мы теперь не можем нормально заливать нативные прилы. Для легкого понимания, залив "за продвижение приложения" доступен только если у в…
Меня постоянно спрашивают (да кто тебя там спрашивает, кому ты усрался), как мы выбираем гео для залива. Давайте расскажу как начинали и чем закончили.
Как я уже говорил, 60% от всех платных подписок в appstore в мире совершаются в США. Начали мы в США, CPM — конь, CTR — слабый, CPA — оч дорого.
После этого ушли в Канаду, кстати интересный факт, второй официальный язык — Французский, учитывайте в крео. Там показате…
Друзья, а че ебальники у всех грустные? Я один у кого вообще ничего не забанило?
АГЕНТСКИЕ АККАУНТЫ FB 3%
МОЙ КАНАЛ | ПОДПИШИСЬ
МОЙ ЧАТИК | ВСТУПАЙ
🤡14🤣6😁6🤝2🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fomo_traffic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOMO TRAFF | ЗАЛИВАЮ ВСЯКОЕ” (@fomo_traffic), 958 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fomo_traffic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.