Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Илья Фоминцев online

Channel

Илья Фоминцев online

@fomintsevi

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,885subscribers

-56 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001515447792
TypeChannel
Username@fomintsevi
Created25 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fomintsevi

Growth

10,88510,94110,9135 August 2026 — 10,941 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,941 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,937 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,929 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,923 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,924 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,918 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,896 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,889 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,888 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,885 subscribers5 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 12 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,877–10,949 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:5710,885-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:3610,888-1
15 Aug 2026, 06:2210,889-7
13 Aug 2026, 23:1810,896-22
11 Aug 2026, 13:5210,918-6
10 Aug 2026, 14:3110,924+1
9 Aug 2026, 14:1510,923-6
8 Aug 2026, 12:4410,929-8
7 Aug 2026, 11:0510,937-4
6 Aug 2026, 02:4510,941no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0110,941first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 4 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 10,885 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,190
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held21 (4 December 202512 August 2026)
Views total2,190
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,509 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,79251.1%
👍93526.6%
🔥67319.2%
👏932.65%
🥰100.285%
🎉30.085%
🤔20.057%
🤩10.028%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,509reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC≈2,190 views100 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Давненько не было рубрики #радионенапрасно. Сегодня в ней вот я бьюсь об заклад - мало кто слышал это имя - Вагиф Азиз оглы Мустафа-заде. А это явление не только в советском, но и в мировом джазе. В 70-е годы в Баку сложилась странная ситуация. Вроде как СССР - лещенки и прочие кобзоны имя которым легион. Но одновременно странным образом в вечном городе расцветал азербайджанский джаз. Самобытный настолько, что получ

👏4840👍10🤔2

8 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC≈41,100 views199 reactionsread 15 August 2026

И снова всем привет - очередное интервью для Грэма. Говорили про то как удары по НПЗ могут повлиять на заболеваемость раком (спойлер - вот прям на рак не очень-то, но есть мягко говоря... нюансы), А еще говорили про рак гортани и гортаноглотки, про меланому и вообще про страх перед раком. велкам смотреть https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4t_6ZM29xA

121👍56🔥19🥰3

5 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC≈5,560 views136 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Вот сейчас будет пост для граждан Казахстана в первую очередь. Но вообще и to whom it may concern конечно. Дело в том что у меня есть мысль на базе школы онкологии IPSM запустить онлайн-сервис прямой помощи онкологическим пациентам Казахстана, которую будут оказывать выпускники, резиденты и преподаватели проекта. Я такое уже делал в России и сейчас этот сервис помогает более 80% онкологических семей в РФ ("Все не нап

90👍41🔥5

19 Jun 2026, 15:43 UTC≈7,230 views174 reactionsread 15 August 2026

У меня тут было очень интересное интервью. На этот раз не про медицину. А про то как устроена благотворительность и как люди принимают решения о том на что им жертвовать деньги. Как устроены фонды и зачем они нужны. В общем это интервью про социальную психологию альтруизма и благотворительности. Не знаю как кому - но мне эта тема всегда была крайне интересна: это к слову тема моей выпускной работы в Стокгольмской шко

👍8567🔥16👏6

18 May 2026, 21:00 UTC≈9,110 views302 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Очередное интервью на Грэме. - Рак легкого и рак простаты. - Чуть про диффузный рак желудка - Чуть про наследственность и что с ней делать. Прошу прощения за звук - уже решаю, вот купил специальный микрофон. Будем тестировать с Грэмом. Так что в следующий раз будет лучше. https://youtu.be/WE015c3PveE?si=Syojy8xMrmP0PGCZ

180👍76🔥46

18 May 2026, 18:40 UTC≈8,000 views347 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Ого какой отклик. Ну раз это всем так нравится, то сохраняйте себе эту страницу ☝️ в закладки, а я это ещё доработаю. Есть идейки чем. И кстати тут у меня в фб в комментариях нарисовался мой старый товарищ Паша Бранд (невролог) и мы с ним вместе разработаем вот такое же ещё для неврологической патологии, подключу и других спецов из неврологии для того же самого. Stay tuned. И если у вас есть знакомые которые нужда

🔥222110👏15

18 May 2026, 16:26 UTC≈14,500 views540 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Я подумал вот чего. Все равно ведь все вы так или иначе используете ИИ для медицинских советов. Но это тоже нужно грамотно уметь делать. И на самом деле ИИ сейчас прямо очень и очень неплох в этом: я вот зуб даю он не хуже эдак 80-90% онкологов. Я думаю если бы их заменить ИИ - оно все было бы сильно получше. И я решил создать инструкцию для онкологических пациентов о том как настроить проект в ChatGPT или Claude ч

311🔥168👍58🥰2🎉1

14 May 2026, 10:26 UTCviews —

Илья Фоминцев online pinned «Если кому-то надо написать мне лично - контакты в шапке канала и это @ifomintsev. А то я смотрю не все могут найти»

14 May 2026, 10:26 UTC≈7,560 views137 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Если кому-то надо написать мне лично - контакты в шапке канала и это @ifomintsev. А то я смотрю не все могут найти

101👍19🔥17

23 Apr 2026, 03:57 UTC≈43,900 views154 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Интервью моего коллеги по проектам обучения онкологов - Вадима Гущина на Грэме. Про сверхсложные операции в онкологии и почему они сверхсложны. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jhSiEhDnDc&t=3163s

👍11143

21 Apr 2026, 13:11 UTC≈7,960 views94 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

65👍18🔥11

21 Apr 2026, 13:10 UTC≈7,890 views105 reactionsread 15 August 2026

У меня между прочим в Алматы скоро (23 апреля в 16.00 в Narxoz Business School) состоится мастер-класс по фандрайзингу для некоммерческих организаций. Тут вот какое дело: я играющий тренер, а не сбитый летчик. И мало того что у меня немалый опыт в этом (уже в трёх странах), так ещё я и написал диссертацию в Стокгольмской школе экономики ровно по этому направлению - предикция покупательского поведения людей в отношен

60🔥26👍19

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @fomintsevi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 719,713 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Илья Фоминцев online” (@fomintsevi), 10,885 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fomintsevi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.