Channel
@followflyphant
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002028058892 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @followflyphant |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/followflyphant |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 23 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 22 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 22 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (25 April 2025 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 23 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2025 to 30 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вы не просили, но вот вам чек-лист проверки компонента в Figma 🤨 https://flyphant.notion.site/3ad6b2ab2cc1804c82e7fb9fdae81e3a Можно смело копировать себе, использовать, распространять и вообще творить добро. #figma #компонент #библиотека #чеклист #дизайнерам
Если вдруг не знали когда использовать сетку при построении интерфейсов, то вот: https://vc.ru/design/2792046-kogda-ispolzovat-setku-v-dizayne-interfeysev Это я всякие внутренние лекции студии нашей потихоньку огласке предаю. #дизайн #интерфейс #сетка #дизайнер #читать
👍2
Есть одно старое правило: сначала сделать красиво, а потом уже сделать из этого правило. Применяется оно вообще ко всему, где что-то создается: в архитектуре, в автомобильной промышленности, и, конечно, в IT индустрии. 👇
Совсем забыли рассказать про лекцию от директора по стратегии лаборатории стратегического брендинга deepUP — Марии Зарубкиной 😳 Это случилось ещё в прошлом году 13 октября. Мария проводила качественные и количественные исследования для компаний в сфере FMCG и электроники. Более 10 лет работала в автомобильном бизнесе, продвигая продажи сервиса и адаптируя бизнес-процессы головного офиса и дилерской сети под растущи…
Продолжение инициативы «Редизайн» Outline — замечательное приложение (да и вообще весь софт), которое помогает нам в работе каждый день. Кажется, оно заслуживает редизайна: https://dribbble.com/shots/26974306-Redesign-Outline Предыдущий редизайн: https://t.me/followflyphant/54 #interface #app #ui #redesign #design #vpn #outline #приложение #айфон #iphone #ios
Ещё одна лекция от приглашённого гостя прошла в студии. На этот раз Жанна Крутикова рассказала о том, как проблема и увлечение переросли в успешний бизнес. Она теперь ещё и официальный амбассадор Kangoo Jumps в России 😳 @kangoojumpsFITNESS Кстати, иногда и мальчики у них бывают на тренировках ☺️ А в прошлый раз был рассказ про индустрию видеоигр в России: https://t.me/followflyphant/47 #спорт #фитнес #kj #kangoo…
Мысль 70 Мысль про фоторетушь: фотографии и картинки нужно готовить с учетом того, где и в каких условиях на эти картинки будут смотреть. Конечно, важно учитывать окружение картинки: что будет вокруг неё, поверх неё, на каком экране или бумаге. Но так же стоит учитывать и то, что глаз человека адаптируется не только к яркости света (сужение и расширение зрачков), но и к цветам. Кто пробовал носить желтые такие или …
Мысль 69 Если получилось сделать быстрее и осталось чуть времени Если, например, дали задание на иконку, то помимо самой иконки хорошо бы показать как она работает в интерфейсе, как сочетается с остальными иконками, легко ли в ней заменить цвет. Подход такой же, как и к логотипам. И там, и там — знак, который должен вызывать ассоциации (с компанией или функцией). И этот знак может быть много где применен: и в темно…
… а иногда у нас бывают дизайн-челенджи 🤓 Прошлый был про “интерфейсы в природе”: https://t.me/followflyphant/28 В этом было задание изобразить свое рабочее место в любом стиле и любым способом. Да, мы все работаем удаленно, потому у всех так по разному 🫶 Кстати, мы бы не отказались взглянуть ещё на несколько рабочих мест. Вакансии открыты: https://flyphant.com/ru/career/ #работа #стол #рабочееместо #удаленка #с…
❤1🔥1
Здорово, когда плоды твоих трудов помогают детям познавать мир, учиться чему-то новому. Подопечные благотворительных организаций, учащиеся школ и воспитанники детских садов получают наши раскраски (и карандаши в придачу). На данный момент подарено более 2500 раскрасок. И у нас есть ещё. Обращайтесь 🤗 [email protected] Недавно порадовали детей из: Благотворительный фонд помощи тяжелобольным детям «ЖИВИ» - fond-zhi…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @followflyphant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 833,481 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Flyphant” (@followflyphant), 23 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/followflyphant.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.