Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кофеин в венах||18+

@focku_ART

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003955517642
TypeChannel
Username@focku_ART
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/focku_ART

Growth

31353311 Aug 2026, 16:31 — 35 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:45 — 35 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:32 — 31 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:3112 Aug 2026, 03:32
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:3231-4
11 Aug 2026, 16:4535no change
11 Aug 2026, 16:3135first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
310.6%
avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.3
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held12 (10 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,059
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52945090459509922631629.1%
custom 52830739489284612551221.8%
custom 5235654241510503752814.5%
custom 5287238671341213491712.7%
custom 5362051242086375279610.9%
custom 526930073613449828359.09%
custom 526954361653508927611.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ребят, я понимаю что до окончания опроса осталось почти 2 часа... Но даже я уже замечаю ебейшую накрутку. Типо... На участников кроме 1 и 6 никто практически не голосует... Плюс стали появляться в подписчиках нн акки с пустым оформлением.... Таким макаром я оборву опросник и уже не будет никаких призовых. Ну это уже рил стрёмно. 🥺

custom 52945090459509922632

11 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC33 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🫣меня начинают пугать пустые профили в моих подписчиках.. То ссылки какие-то, то куча подарков у них весит...

custom 52945090459509922632

11 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC57 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Норм вы разошлись 🔭

custom 52356542415105037522

11 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC55 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ладно, это уже выглядит более менее норм.

custom 53620512420863752794custom 52872386713412134913custom 52830739489284612552custom 52945090459509922631

11 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC55 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Финальный итог наград: 1 место — 870₽ 2 место — 522₽ 3 место — 348₽ Причины понижения: Разделение на 50%/30%/20% и удалось выделить на призовые ±2к₽.

custom 52830739489284612552custom 53620512420863752792

11 Aug 2026, 00:23 UTC70 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Не получается уснуть, тиктокерские довели меня Джоджо рисовать

custom 52356542415105037526custom 52872386713412134914

10 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC95 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Пожалуй напомню. Плюс первым трём заказам скидка 10%

custom 52945090459509922634

10 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC161 viewsread 11 August 2026

Возможны уменьшения призовых т.к финансовое состояние 📉

10 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC262 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52830739489284612555custom 52693007361344982832custom 52945090459509922632

10 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC175 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

А вот и долгожданные итоги Хумки-хрумки ака хуманизации сладостей. Юзы участников: 1— @MiuMiu69_52 2— @no_nahe 3— @Ventilatoo 4— @HappyMargoshka 5— @self0ioyu 6— @Just_An4ik 7— @mittssuuu 8— @lavandoshka_0 9— @MrJonathon33 10— @swqqyao Так же ниже будет опрос где вы проголосуете за 3 призовых места, в ротации от большего к меньшему.

custom 52945090459509922635custom 52693007361344982833custom 52830739489284612553custom 52695436165350892761

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @focku_ART. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 497,115 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кофеин в венах||18+” (@focku_ART), 31 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/focku_ART.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.