Channel
@foccantwell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
293subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002751051813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @foccantwell |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/foccantwell |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 293 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 293 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
37 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 25 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Talk about "concerning content"... University of Minnesota site warns of a 'whiteness pandemic,' urges White parents to 're-educate' https://www.foxnews.com/politics/university-minnesota-site-warns-whiteness-pandemic-urges-white-parents-re-educate
I go to the feds and 7 police agencies in 3 states with provably hacked phones saying I've got the goods on sex traffickers who've been assaulting and menacing me and they're like "Sorry to hear that buddy, make sure all your paperwork is in order as you run from them, or we'll throw your ass in jail." One asshole reports "concerning content" on my Telegram channel and the cops are at my home before they've even bot…
In my view, cowardice is about the worst thing a man can engage in, and much of what is called forgiveness I think little more than that. Say I choose to forgive the people who harmed me in the last two years. I wash my hands of the matter, respond to their taunts with saintly assurances of my self righteous capacity to accept my victimization in stride. Their crime wave continues unabated as they suck kids into t…
❤3
I like the idea that things happen for a reason. I have these enemies, and they are, first and foremost, diverse in the truest sense. This makes it near impossible to attribute precise motives unless you can identify the perpetrator, and even then there's often uncertainty. But anyone who would report that recording as child abuse is obviously a liar and acting on pure malice. This is the most common thread. Disho…
❤5
I consider this a pretty strong endorsement of the content. If it was actually bad they'd send money and blow smoke up my ass trying to lead me to ruin. Instead they committed a crime trying to stop me.
❤3
Someone reported the recordings with the kids to DCYF and the cops are at my place right now. "Some concerning content posted to Telegram" Give them a listen and see what fuckin lowlives my enemies are.
I may have overstated the desperation of my RAM requirements. I had 96GB in one of the machines. By reducing this to 64GB, I've freed up 32gb which I can split between the other two. All systems are go. 🫡
I had a conversation with some smart kids recently about training wheels, which also touched on subjects like gender and punishment. Check out this recording.
File, posted without a caption
❤1
I've made some detailed updates above the funds solicitations. For those of you looking at Telegram previews, please check this channel and scroll up to the beginning of my November 21st posts.
❤2
I set up a new GiveSendGo for those without access to Cash App. I'll still receive funds from the one setup while I was in jail, but this is better option, now that I'm out and in control of my accounts. https://www.givesendgo.com/cccnext
❤4
But cash remains the best option. https://cash.app/edgychris
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @foccantwell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 780,415 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Friends Of Chris Cantwell” (@foccantwell), 293 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foccantwell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.