Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лютик

Channel

Лютик

@flv_flor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

509subscribers

-297 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002237797482
TypeChannel
Username@flv_flor
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 October 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/flv_flor

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

509806657.57 August 2026 — 806 subscribers8 August 2026 — 806 subscribers8 August 2026 — 801 subscribers15 August 2026 — 758 subscribers23 August 2026 — 719 subscribers31 August 2026 — 676 subscribers9 September 2026 — 641 subscribers17 September 2026 — 603 subscribers1 October 2026 — 568 subscribers12 October 2026 — 526 subscribers18 October 2026 — 509 subscribers7 August 202618 October 2026
11 measurements spanning 72 days, net -297. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 464–851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Oct 2026, 18:20509-17
12 Oct 2026, 11:48526-42
1 Oct 2026, 19:00568-35
17 Sept 2026, 21:17603-38
9 Sept 2026, 07:35641-35
31 Aug 2026, 06:07676-43
23 Aug 2026, 05:18719-39
15 Aug 2026, 01:44758-43
8 Aug 2026, 04:51801-5
8 Aug 2026, 01:34806no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:04806first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

468 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529178958003335262314631.2%
custom 54315860195792813058017.1%
🕊7415.8%
custom 52379481835433074596413.7%
custom 53075536991475667896413.7%
custom 5237812685915050668408.55%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC22 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

либо 15 либо 20 участников и провожу

custom 52917895800333526231custom 54315860195792813051

5 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC176 viewsread 8 August 2026

Мью/вз красивых связь — @FL_skZ канал — @flv_flor отметка — @lytik_ffl

5 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC243 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

🕊19custom 529178958003335262319custom 543158601957928130519

4 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC159 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱 🧸 или 💝 🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱 🌱подписка на канал (каждый будет проверяться на подписку, если вы подписались только что ради выигрыша, то не участвуете) 🌱вести актив на канале 🌱точку в комм 🌱всем удачи🍀 до стопа

🕊7custom 52917895800333526236custom 54315860195792813056

4 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC189 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

custom 529178958003335262320🕊17custom 543158601957928130517

3 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC306 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

custom 529178958003335262319🕊18custom 543158601957928130518

2 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC297 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

custom 543158601957928130519custom 529178958003335262314🕊13

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @flv_flor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лютик” (@flv_flor), 509 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flv_flor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.