Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FLOW fest | Cover dance fest Tyumen

@flowfesttmn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

456subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003840080925
TypeChannel
Username@flowfesttmn
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/flowfesttmn

Growth

456457456.56 Aug 2026, 21:48 — 457 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:22 — 456 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:487 Aug 2026, 09:22
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 456–457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 09:22456-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:48457first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
110.9%
avg views ÷ 456 subscribers
Avg views / post
506
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held7 (19 July 202624 July 2026)
Views total3,540
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3434.0%
3030.0%
🔥2626.0%
💋44.00%
🥰44.00%
👾22.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC354 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💜 🌌🌌🌌🌌🌌🌌 💜 Вторая часть фотографий с нашего фестиваля! Фотограф: Монах Больше фото 📸здесь📸

5🔥3👾2❤‍🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC562 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💜 🌌🌌🌌🌌🌌🌌 💜 Первые фотографии с нашего фестиваля! Фотограф: Ктотик Больше фото 📸 здесь 📸

8🔥3🥰1

21 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC826 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Следующий Флоу...

  1. Начало декабря 202656%
  2. Конец января 202720%
  3. Начало февраля 202710%
  4. Середина февраля 20273%
  5. Конец февраля 202710%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC539 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Фестиваль отгремел, он был первым для коллаборации Mid и Kitsune. Очень просим вас дать обратную связь в специальной форме, чтобы в своих будущих проектах мы учли все плюсы и минусы! Тык -} https://forms.gle/BLF7rE9BuBFDmuP66

❤‍🔥12💋4

20 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC516 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💜 🌌🌌🌌🌌🌌🌌 💜 Список победителей Flow fest 💜Solo 1 место: Mike - Le sserafim - Crazy 2 место: Jiyun - Enhypen - Drunk-Dazed 3 место: Milena - Ivy - Want me back 💜Boys 1 место: Hellwood - Enhypen - Knife 2 место: Farewell Eclipse - Txt - Back for More 3 место: Phantom flame - Lngshot - Moonwalking 💜Girls 1 место: Diverse - Hearts2Hearts - Rude! 2 место: Werise teens - VVS - D. I. M. M 3 место: Rave

❤‍🔥19🔥1812🥰3

20 Jul 2026, 04:47 UTC348 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @paty_ya

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 с FLOW FEST смотрим ➡️тут⬅️

🔥2

19 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC395 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @paty_ya

Проходочки на осеннюю PAPAYA уходят к FAREWELL ECLIPSE и SHINRIN ❤️

5❤‍🔥2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @flowfesttmn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTCAnonymous Poll301 voters

Следующий Флоу...

  1. Начало декабря 202656%
  2. Конец января 202720%
  3. Начало февраля 202710%
  4. Середина февраля 20273%
  5. Конец февраля 202710%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 72,746 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FLOW fest | Cover dance fest Tyumen” (@flowfesttmn), 456 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flowfesttmn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.