Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Цветы жизни!

Channel

Цветы жизни!

@flowersofourlife

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

833subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001442492989
TypeChannel
Username@flowersofourlife
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/flowersofourlife

Growth

8318338326 August 2026 — 831 subscribers7 August 2026 — 832 subscribers14 August 2026 — 833 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 831–833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:45833+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:31832+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:47831first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 8 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.4%
avg views ÷ 833 subscribers
Avg views / post
178
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held16 (8 April 202631 July 2026)
Views total713
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

295 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16355.3%
🔥3612.2%
👍3110.5%
👏144.75%
🙏113.73%
💯82.71%
❤‍🔥62.03%
😢62.03%
😁51.69%
😭31.02%
😱31.02%
👌20.678%
🙉20.678%
🤔20.678%
🤝20.678%
🤨10.339%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 06:28 UTC136 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сепарация почти 💯 процентов. Хочет жить отдельно. Очень быстро …

14

31 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC151 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Очень любопытный ресурс через факты, не личные мнения-предпочтения https://t.me/c/1292964247/411066 Кажется, стратегия для младшего сына прорисовывается всЁ ярчЕ 🇷🇺🇨🇳🇪🇺 Российские абитуриенты бросились поступать в европейские и китайские вузы из-за бешеного конкурса в вузах РФ. Спрос на зарубежное образование подскочил сразу на 20%. При этом университеты Европы и Китая активно дают россиянам скидки с грантами и д

😭3👌2🔥21

27 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC205 viewsread 6 August 2026

ЕГЭ или Олимпиады дают больше шансов на поступление? Олимпиады. Но через полгода ребят «отчисляют», т к знаний супер крутых по ОДНОМУ предмету недостаточно. Это нам рассказали студенты МФТИ. Бюджет в прошлом году на биотех забрали олимпиадники по биологии. Они не знали и не хотели изучать математику и/или химию. Такова правда жизни. В ролике - все так. Еще в этом году конкурс выше, потому что на 2008 пришелся бум

27 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC221 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

«Я поступаю в Финансовый университет на международную экономику и торговлю Китая. У нас 52 бюджетных места, подали документы 4200 человек. Я благодаря олимпиадам сейчас держусь на 19 месте, но у нас БВИшников (студенты, проходящие без вступительных испытаний) больше, чем бюджетных мест. Вот - 92 БВИшника. До этого было вообще их 110. И хочу вам показать уникальный кейс, как человек, у которого 3 сотки за ЕГЭ и 10 ба

😢6🤔21🔥1🤨1

11 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC332 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На неделе узнали, за день собрались и сегодня приехали на ITMO Family Day Мега много информации для абитуриентов и праздник выпускников. Ребята в разговорах очень высоко и позитивно оценивают учёбу. Крупные корпорации с огромным шатрами рассказывают о карьере, дарят сувениры, открывают кафедры и зовут, ждут молодых, умных и дерзких.

6🔥5👍1

5 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC348 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Обратная связь от первого лица Дочка оставила отзывы по репетиторам, с которыми занималась. https://t.me/samapoka/1441 Факт 1: школа сильная, но у 90% выпускников по предметам для ЕГЭ репетиторы Факт 2: моя постановка репетиторам была давать знания через рост любви к предмету. Факт 3: я участвовала в отборе, слово мое было решающее, как платящего, но голос Саши был важен и каждый мог наложить вето. Мнение 1: на

14👍4🙏1

28 Jun 2026, 12:40 UTC411 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

МЕЛ опросил выпускников про мечты. Радует, очень радует. Пусть так и будет. Единственное расстройство: если реально 2008 год урожайный на детишек, то конкурс может быть ОГО-ГО 🤞 Из всех панических рекомендаций по поступлению в сети, это объяснение считаю самым лаконичном, логичным и полезным: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZzUr4PDWdC/?img_index=8&igsh=MW5oOWtkZGljOGxyaw==

6😁2

27 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC376 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

16🔥2❤‍🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 09:29 UTC332 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Маленькая история с большими выводами Заказали мы необычный фотоальбом на выпускной. Ну, как необычный: в 91 школе Гоши – это норма. В классической строгой школе, как у Саши (я их называю «белый верх, черный низ») это может стать вызовом. Предложение сделать фото живыми, а не постановочными в студии разделило родителей на два лагеря. Победило любопытство. И дальше от меньшинства начались обиды и критика: – Моя до

👍63🙏2

25 Jun 2026, 17:49 UTC295 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Покинула чат Завтра вручение аттестатов. Ещё не пришли баллы за последний ЕГЭ (биология). Потом выпускной в ВДНХ для москвичей. Я насчитала 110!!! артистов, которые всю ночь будут развлекать детей. «Получить» ребенка до завершения вечеринки (как откроют метро) совсем непросто, из рук в руки с заявлением и паспортом, безопасность. Следующей ночью ещё одна вечеринка – выпускной класса в SoHo Country Club. Опытные

13👍9😱3

16 Jun 2026, 06:19 UTC394 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Вчера Саша сдала последний экзамен. Ещё напряг останется в ожидании баллов, но можно и посмеяться УЖЕ :)

7👏6❤‍🔥5

7 Jun 2026, 17:59 UTC486 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Два экзамена позади, ещё два впереди Завтра профмат. Вокруг разборы, поиск ошибок. Мне нравится фраза: «Смотрим вперед, готовимся к следующему, не рефлексируем, что было вчера». Два новых лайфхака-помощника применили. Первый от репа по биологии: На ватмане расписать разными красочными фломастерами и карандашами ВСЁ, что прошли. Схематично, коротко, главное. Некий справочник от руки, на что смотреть приятно и доп п

27👍5🤝2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @flowersofourlife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,280,914 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Цветы жизни!” (@flowersofourlife), 833 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flowersofourlife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.