Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Блог Санчеза

@flowersdel1very_Blog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

138subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002198400767
TypeChannel
Username@flowersdel1very_Blog
DescriptionПо всем вопросам: @VUJ0_ww
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 6 June 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/flowersdel1very_Blog

Growth

1388 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 138 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:01 — 138 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:468 Aug 2026, 23:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137–139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:01138no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:46138first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,349 reactions across 19 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31123.1%
🔥19514.5%
🍓16111.9%
❤‍🔥15511.5%
🤔1047.71%
😨1017.49%
😁715.26%
custom 5314649487631723090644.74%
👍503.71%
201.48%
💘191.41%
🤯151.11%
🥰120.89%
🤨110.815%
custom 536856243398194713580.593%
🦄80.593%
🌭60.445%
👏60.445%
💋60.445%
😈60.445%
9 further kinds201.48%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2024 to 3 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2024, 12:02 UTC534 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем, кто перейдёт по ссылке, ждёт приятный бонус в моём баре и тгк, ждите.

17🍾2👾1

3 Nov 2024, 11:59 UTC534 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня всем вино бесплатное… t.me/vinoupbot?start=6851805837 И да, оно качественное.

🔥181👍1

10 Aug 2024, 12:04 UTC≈1,170 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Надо быть осторожней в своих делах. Я не считаю, что существуют понятия, как "добро" и "зло". Без добра не было и зла. Но если копы - это добро для обычных жителей, то для таких как я, они же будут самым настоящим злом.

custom 5314649487631723090646👏5custom 536856243398194713541

20 Jul 2024, 21:48 UTCviews —

Блог Санчеза pinned «Мне тут парни рассказали ещё что есть в пейджере бусты попробуем? https://t.me/boost/flowersdel1very_Blog»

14 Jul 2024, 15:51 UTC≈2,090 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мне тут парни рассказали ещё что есть в пейджере бусты попробуем? https://t.me/boost/flowersdel1very_Blog

35🍓3😨3custom 53685624339819471352🌭1👍1

Signed J0dah (чекайте био)

14 Jul 2024, 15:48 UTC≈1,940 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну что ж бревна задавайте свои вопросы

👍31🌭21🍓1

Signed J0dah (чекайте био)

14 Jul 2024, 15:33 UTC≈1,730 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем привет, я недавно показал Джону ещё один цех дорогого алкоголя И так же проверил 2 бревна на паршивость убил 2 зайцев одним выстрелом так сказать Ждите следующих новостей и пришивайтесь ко мне в банду

43🥰4

Signed J0dah (чекайте био)

10 Jul 2024, 09:29 UTC≈1,720 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мне иногда кажется что Джон хочет накрыть мой бизнес дорогого алкоголя Я слышал что Джон ищет блять выгоду во всем, но я не думаю что со мной может такое произойти ведь все таки Евсей не опровергал сделку с жирным Всем хорошего настроения, Пришивайтесь ко мне в банду

🍓61👍64😈3custom 53685624339819471352🌭1💋1

Signed J0dah (чекайте био)

7 Jul 2024, 14:52 UTC≈1,700 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Показал амиго свой цех по производству дорогого алкоголя И к нам пришли мусора опять же марло или розен написали много жалоб может объявить им войну что думаете?......

595🍓3🤔3👍2🥰2👏1

Signed J0dah (чекайте био)

29 Jun 2024, 10:35 UTC≈2,070 views82 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вчера мой амиго "поговорил" с человеком который сливает информацию о нашей банде Ждите следующих новостей

😁674💘4👀3👍21🍓1

27 Jun 2024, 16:29 UTC≈2,020 views83 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У меня для вас всех есть маленькое дельце. Распространите мой блог, чтоб я мог достичь цели, ммм, хотя бы 750 подписчиков. Вы можете распространять в своих блогах, можете в комментариях, но не дайте блог Марло и другим членам "хорошей" мафии.

69🥰6🍓2👍2🤔2💋1😁1

27 Jun 2024, 16:23 UTC≈1,620 views74 reactionsread 8 August 2026

По секрету скажу. Я сомневался до последнего в моём Амиго. Но сейчас я ему полностью доверяю. Марло, не думай, что тебе всё так легко достанется.

❤‍🔥62🔥5🤔32🌭1🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @flowersdel1very_Blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 294,103 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блог Санчеза” (@flowersdel1very_Blog), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flowersdel1very_Blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.