Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Flow with PavloS , , , 🐉

Channel

Flow with PavloS , , , 🐉

@flow_with_PavloS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002003009891
TypeChannel
Username@flow_with_PavloS
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/flow_with_PavloS

Growth

5557567 August 2026 — 57 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57 subscribers27 August 2026 — 55 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 20 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 20:0555-2
10 Aug 2026, 06:4657no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:5957first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 05s
Average length
1m 22s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5990.8%
🔥46.15%
custom 531667943090973252123.08%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2025 to 26 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 18 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @flow_with_PavloS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2025 to 26 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Mar 2026, 18:35 UTC37 views5 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

AI в продакшені: чому "додамо ще один AI" — не завжди гарна ідея Ловив себе на думці: чим складніша система — тим частіше хочеться "закрити це AI-шаром" І в якийсь момент розумієш — ти вже не керуєш системою ти з нею домовляєшся 🤖 --- 🧠 У чому проблема Кожен AI-шар — це ще одна інтерпретація Один зрозумів не так другий переформулював третій додав "креативу"… На виході — вже не факт, а версія факту 😅 І поки з

3🔥2

5 Jan 2026, 12:12 UTC59 views5 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Дрочити чи не дрочити? Секс зараз — чи потім? Питання не в акті. Питання — в режимі: ти в присутності чи в автопілоті. ⚡️ Секс і мастурбація — не про «втратив/накопичив енергію». Це про те, куди йде увага і що робить з тобою стан. Автопілот виглядає так: поспіх → «треба негайно» → напруга → втеча → сором / порожнеча після. Тіло ніби «відпускає», але всередині — розсипає. Присутність виглядає інакше: тепло → м’які

🔥2custom 531667943090973252121

9 Dec 2025, 17:57 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Відео до попереднього допису. Відтворення мого спостерігання, як АІ намагається фіксити свій же код😁🙈

2

24 Nov 2025, 14:04 UTC93 views4 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Vibe coding мертвий? Ні. Але без інженерії — це пастка 🪓🤖 Є технології, які виглядають як магія. Vibe coding одна з них, швидкий старт, миттєва динаміка, відчуття, що ти керуєш кодом силою думки. Перші години все справді летить — UI оживає, рішення сипляться одне за одним, і здається, що ось воно: новий рівень продуктивності 🚀 Але коли додається складність, реальність швидко знімає рожеві окуляри. AI починає плутат

4

21 Oct 2025, 17:38 UTC88 views4 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ось це вже цікавенько, для тих хто питає порад в інвестуванні у ChatGPT🤭. Alpha Arena — живий бенчмарк інвест-інтелекту на ШІ 🤖📈 Суть: ребяткі міряють інвест здібності ШІ на реальних грошах і в реальному ринку. Кожна модель має $10,000 реальних грошей, та однакові промпти на вході. Маркет: на Hyperliquid. Мета: максимізувати дохідність (не просто «вистрілити», а робити це розумно). Прозорість: усі відповіді моде

4

5 Sept 2025, 15:18 UTC87 views7 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😅 У світі ШІ ми часто говоримо одними й тими ж словами, але маємо на увазі абсолютно різні речі. Як приклад. CEO компанії демонструє “AI-трансформацію”: гордо копіює відповіді ChatGPT у PowerPoint і пояснює колегам, як це змінить бізнес. А 20-річний студент у той же час показує систему, яка відслідковує Stripe webhooks, автоматично латає SQL-таблиці, якщо щось пішло не так, і пише йому смс тільки тоді, коли впевнені

7

11 Aug 2025, 16:48 UTC99 views6 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

# 🌊 Три сценарії майбутнього з AI: головне — залишитись собою Давно не писав. 🛤 Переїзди й адаптація на новому місці — той ще челендж😀. Цей допис — про особисті роздуми щодо майбутнього штучного інтелекту (AI) 🤖 та штучного загального інтелекту (AGI) 🧠. Не претендую на істину, просто ділюся тим, що крутиться в голові. Натрапив на дослідження вчених, де вони змоделювали понад 1,3 мільярда сценаріїв (симуляцій) можли

6

15 May 2025, 00:36 UTC104 views9 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

❤️ Радість, Любов, Довіра, Сила бути собою, тут і зараз. PavloS🐉 2025 Летимо в бік дому.

9

30 Apr 2025, 07:01 UTC117 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🛠 Давно не ділився, чим займаюсь зараз… На днях завершив важливий етап свого нового проєкту: створив Telegram-бота спеціально для підприємців, які будують особистий бренд та цінують свій час ⏳💼 Цей бот — твій "СММ-асистент у тіні": він приймає фото чи відео від твого СММника або довіреної особи, і самостійно постить їх у твої Telegram Stories від твого імені, без твоєї участі. 🔐 Важливо: довірена особа не має дост

6

10 Apr 2025, 02:26 UTC133 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Продовження до попереднього посту. Ось максимум який я зміг витягнути з мікса - мій геній промптингу😂 + Gpt4o + новий генератор картинок + сора(відео👆). Обсудимо? Чи може цікаво як то зробив і що було ісходніком? Так-так це теж важливий поінт.😂

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @flow_with_PavloS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 834,493 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Flow with PavloS , , , 🐉” (@flow_with_PavloS), 55 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flow_with_PavloS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.