Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Flouwi (natsumi)

@flouuwii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

406subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001975135223
TypeChannel
Username@flouuwii
Created25 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/flouuwii

Growth

406407406.58 Aug 2026, 11:20 — 407 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:30 — 407 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:52 — 406 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:208 Aug 2026, 23:52
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 406–407 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:52406-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:30407no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:20407first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

700 reactions across 11 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17424.9%
💘12117.3%
🍓10615.1%
❤‍🔥7811.1%
custom 5354928064595763186689.71%
🔥456.43%
💯314.43%
custom 5260523798666426714172.43%
🥴162.29%
🎃111.57%
🙏111.57%
💋71.00%
🕊60.857%
💅50.714%
😎20.286%
😍10.143%
🦄10.143%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 700reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC576 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#PortfolioDay возвращаюсь. буду рада репостам

💘15❤‍🔥13💋6🕊52custom 53549280645957631862💯1

23 Jun 2026, 16:04 UTC421 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ХАЙПОВЫЙ КОЛЛАБ с @timberlyaaa и @exwexe11 и моя бимбочка слева😛😛😛

custom 53549280645957631863220🔥10💘4❤‍🔥2💋1

22 Jun 2026, 13:41 UTC408 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

всем привет, это мой новый стиль😛

custom 53549280645957631863416❤‍🔥10🍓3💘2🕊1🥴1🦄1

19 Jun 2026, 11:24 UTC464 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

сегодня у меня хорошее настроение (КУПИЛА БУЛДАК🎉) я вас очень люблюю подписчикеее, всем хорошего дняя!!!♡♡♡

17🍓14🔥7💘2custom 52605237986664267142❤‍🔥1

17 Jun 2026, 21:11 UTC469 views90 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

хочу булдак чииерт а вообще я посмотрела клип сабринки карпентээррр House Tour

💘30❤‍🔥25🙏11🍓10custom 526052379866642671485💯1

17 Jun 2026, 08:41 UTC388 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

утречка, мы с подругой с невероятным рвением пытались дойти до пленэра, но увы безуспешно🤡🤡🤡

💘1614💯6❤‍🔥3🔥3😎2

16 Jun 2026, 20:36 UTC377 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему игноришь?)

🥴15🍓129💯3💘2❤‍🔥1

16 Jun 2026, 20:25 UTC373 views95 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спишь?)

🍓3525🔥19💘9❤‍🔥4💅2💯1

15 Jun 2026, 16:38 UTC370 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

привет чат гпт сгенерируй влв арт🩷🤍 участвовала в коллабе!!!♡ Я ВЕРНУЛАСЬ РЕБЯТКИ. пленэр меня жёстко съел, но я возвращаюсь к вам и СКОРО БУДЕТ КОЕ ЧТО БОМБЕЗНОЕ💥💥💥

30💘19🎃11❤‍🔥7🔥4custom 52605237986664267142💅1💯1

29 May 2026, 11:38 UTC513 views79 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

на самом деле 90% своих скетчей я не показываю😏 нооо мои друзья привязали меня к батареи и заставили выложить, потому что считают их шедеврами и мои фотки естественно🥺 кстати сдала сессию, все ахуенчик, спасибо за поддержку любимые💗💗😭🥹 всем удачки с экзаменами, я в вас верю!!!

33💯18🍓13❤‍🔥6💘4🔥2custom 52605237986664267142💅1

25 May 2026, 05:27 UTC566 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026

утречка, всем хорошей недели!!! я вас очень люблю, подписчекееее!!!💓 У МЕНЯ СЕССИЯ НАХ

🍓19💘18❤‍🔥63custom 52605237986664267143💅1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @flouuwii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 491,558 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Flouwi (natsumi)” (@flouuwii), 406 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flouuwii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.