Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ☁`𝕀nﹰ fl𝕔m w𝖆nt t𝖔.

Channel

☁`𝕀nﹰ fl𝕔m w𝖆nt t𝖔.

@flcmW4NT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

65subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004356417804
TypeChannel
Username@flcmW4NT
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 28 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/flcmW4NT

Growth

506557.529 August 2026 — 50 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50 subscribers29 August 2026 — 51 subscribers6 September 2026 — 65 subscribers29 August 20266 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 17:5665+14
29 Aug 2026, 21:4351+1
29 Aug 2026, 16:1550no change
29 Aug 2026, 16:0050first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.9%
avg views ÷ 65 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.5
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total579
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5413887962591026442828.6%
custom 5220213795426705743725.0%
custom 5314788889385269476621.4%
custom 5314348547863245720310.7%
custom 521559418443769251813.57%
custom 521565105409965990013.57%
custom 521744985941768273313.57%
custom 531662524989731226813.57%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC6 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

❌ · ››🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ִ. ☨. 🤍🦋🤍🤍🤍🦋🤍 🤩🦴🤩🤩🖤🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🦴🤩 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🦴–𝖂𝐄𝐋𝐂𝖔𝐌𝐄, 𝐒𝖔𝐍 𝖔𝐅 𝐆𝖔𝐃🪦 🤍🤍⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ִ. ☨. ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐›› . . . ִ ׂ𝕮 –𝐂𝐫𝐮̂𝐜𝐢̨fı𝐗 ִ ☨.⬛ 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ · ࣪ׄ 💫𝖆н𝖆л ⧼ 𝐏а🌑пятие ⧽ `🌟 𑁤 к𝖆к 𝖚 пр𝖊жд𝖊, р𝖆сп𝖆х𝖚в𝖆𝖊☨ ִ 🕯 )).. пред 𝐁ами двери !

29 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC13 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

!очень хочется узнать о каждом с их точки зрения, поэтому сделайте ассоциацию каждый на себя: цвет, цитата и животное. 𝙃𝙐𝕾𝙆𝙔 :: оранжевый, хотя это далеко не мой любимый цвет, цитат несколько, я не знаю, что выбрать + "я не готов, но я начал". И медоед

29 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC13 viewsread 29 August 2026

!очень хочется узнать о каждом с их точки зрения, поэтому сделайте ассоциацию каждый на себя: цвет, цитата и животное. 𝙀𝙍𝕺𝙓:: Меня очень часто называли дитём солнца, поэтому цвет жёлтый, цитата наверное «Стремитесь не к успеху, а к ценностям, которые он даёт», животное сова потому что бобы 𝙍𝙊𝕾𝙃𝙀 :: голубой/фиолетовый, «меньше знаешь крепче спишь», думаю шиншилла. 𝙐𝙈𝕭𝙄 :: зелёный/темно зелёный, «делай как надо, как н

29 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC19 viewsread 29 August 2026

«создать свой флуд. но я не умею создавать баннеры и аватарки.. 😭😭» 😀😀🥹an𝕠n dr𝕖am. 🎁🥹

29 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC28 viewsread 29 August 2026

!Очень срочный вопрос. Какой ваш любимый чай. 𝙀𝙍𝕺𝙓 :: клюквенный, малиновый, клубничный. Кисленько 𝙃𝙐𝕾𝙆𝙔 :: Мохито от кертис, каркаде и просто заваренный из мяты. 𝙐𝙈𝕭𝙄 :: я вообще кофе люблю... но так же пью зелёный чай, зелёный с кленовым сиропом или же черный чай с мёдом 𝙋𝙃𝙀𝙉𝙇𝙋𝕳𝙏𝙃𝘼𝙇𝙀𝙄𝙉:: я не пью чай, но, за редким исключением, пью молочный улун.

29 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC28 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

!Опишите каждого админа одним словом. Ко всем вопрос, наверное 𝙃𝙐𝕾𝙆𝙔 :: чертт...я не умею. И ещё немного плохо знаком со всеми. Эрокс — сандроне...??? Рош — богатая тётенька Фенолфталеин — умник Умби — водитель бмв Шампиньон — Незнайка Это очень плохо простите, у меня вообще мозги не работают. 𝙀𝙍𝕺𝙓:: это очень легко. Хаски—собачник Рош—богатость Фенолфталеин—химик Умби—любительница лоэна Шампиньон—мамин пранкер 𝙋𝙃

custom 52202137954267057434custom 53147888893852694763custom 54138879625910264423

29 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

𝙃𝙐𝕾𝙆𝙔 :: кто-то очень ждал анон день. Где же вы?? 💌

custom 54138879625910264421

29 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC45 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔲🔲🥹🥹😀🔹н𝕠н д𝕖нь. 🥹🥹 🍵 ☺️аждую субботу вы м𝕠жете задать вопросы админ𝕦страции. Если 𝕒дмин не захоч𝕖т отвечать на в𝕠прос так к𝕒к он будет н𝕖приятен:: ва𝕔 проигнорир𝕪ют. Внач𝕒ле вопроса 𝕠бязательно поставьт𝕖 восклиц𝕒тельный знак. «🤩»— адм𝕦н 𝕠ткрыт к вопрос𝕒м. «🤩»— закрыт. 🪽🪽𝙍𝕺𝙎𝙃𝙀 — 🤩 🪽🪽𝙀𝕽𝙊𝙓 — 🤩 🪽🪽𝘾𝙃𝘼𝙈𝙋𝕴𝙂𝙉𝙊𝙉 — 🤩 🪽🪽𝙐𝙈𝕭𝙄 – 🤩 🪽🪽𝙃𝙐𝕾𝙆𝙔 — 🤩 🪽🪽𝙋𝙃𝙀𝙉𝙇𝙋𝕳𝙏𝙃𝘼𝙇𝙀𝙄𝙉 —🤩 ☺️опрос ко вс𝕖м адм𝕦нам:: @Flcmwant_bot ☺️а в𝕒ш вопр𝕠с отв𝕖тят

custom 53143485478632457203custom 53147888893852694763custom 54138879625910264423custom 52155941844376925181custom 52156510540996599001custom 53166252498973122681

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @flcmW4NT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“☁`𝕀nﹰ fl𝕔m w𝖆nt t𝖔.” (@flcmW4NT), 65 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flcmW4NT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.