Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

некая флеш ка некий рест

@flashka_cosp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003937972136
TypeChannel
Username@flashka_cosp
Descriptionсосплей косплей че канал связь, коллабы и тд в анон, либо в лс канала. МОЙ ЛС ИСПОЛЬЗОВАТЬ В ОЧЕНЬ РЕДКИХ СЛУЧАЯХ!!! ПЛИЗ З
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/flashka_cosp

Growth

747 August 2026 — 74 subscribers9 August 2026 — 74 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:4574no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:0074first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
104.0%
avg views ÷ 74 subscribers
Avg views / post
76.9
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (3 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,385
Reactions total74
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13
Videos
6
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
47s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53956979299839129584256.8%
custom 53031352730166465741723.0%
custom 54584058268950359571317.6%
custom 524222668822966326622.70%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

почему бы и нет

custom 53031352730166465742

Signed ффффффф

9 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🍒🍒🍒🍒 🍒🍒🍒 🍒🍒🍒 🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒 Чтобы пиариться нужно обязательно сделать репост этого поста к себе в тгк🍒 Ссылка на чат: https://t.me/cospiaars Правила: https://t.me/cospiaars/1680778 Админы: @yasushi_vatanabe @Hleb_alo00 @kuromi6_8

Signed ффффффф

7 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC51 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я бы вставила гифку с капланом

custom 53956979299839129583

Signed ффффффф

7 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC52 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

а кще там над на китайскую таблицу смотреть ща в коммы кину

custom 53956979299839129581

Signed ффффффф

7 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC52 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

там обезжиривать над кожу сначала а еще брать медецинский рулонный пластырь на полимерной основе вместо кинезио тейпов🌟

custom 53956979299839129581

Signed ффффффф

6 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC58 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

в анонку кстати пишите я люблю на вопросы отвечать всякие анонка в инфопосте еси шо

custom 53956979299839129581

Signed ффффффф

6 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ойой анонка прилетела чтоооо 1. Сде ла ю.. мей бе завтра даже 2. Прпрпр.!! Пользую сь консилером от Лореаль в 320 оттенке На гра мкня не будет(( в принципе в ставе пока не ждите скоее всего

custom 53956979299839129581

Signed ффффффф

6 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

некий рест флеш ке нужно отдохнуть

custom 53956979299839129581

Signed ффффффф

6 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «некая флеш ка некий рест»

6 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC57 viewsread 9 August 2026

ток тут я забыла няшные милашные зубки надеть нуу что есть то есть

Signed ффффффф

6 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC98 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

оказывается у меня бывают красивые фото (я про них благополучно забыла) ню ладно вот кормитесь🌟

custom 53956979299839129584custom 54584058268950359573custom 52422266882296632662

Signed ффффффф

5 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC76 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я ПОХОДУ НА АНИФЛОРУ ВСЁ ДОДЕЛАТЬ НЕ УСПЕЮ ЭТО УЖ АС

custom 53956979299839129586custom 53031352730166465742

Signed ффффффф

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @flashka_cosp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 339,315 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“некая флеш ка некий рест” (@flashka_cosp), 74 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flashka_cosp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.