Channel
@flancy_service
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
400subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004379233557 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flancy_service |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 13 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flancy_service |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 400 | -16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 416 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 416 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,721 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
28 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5370889932594257618 | 9 | 32.1% | |
| custom 5265125521116634702 | 8 | 28.6% | |
| custom 5350721586510965862 | 5 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5264776220016385602 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5280849134394306796 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5348068409118565703 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5350613151471643696 | 1 | 3.57% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @flancy_service. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Возможно… возможно канал будет с прогрессом в другой км🤩🪡 возможно переоформление в дизайн? Это только мысли и скорее не будет такого. Кстати ребят хочу вас уже поздравить с будущим розыгрышем осенью на БП+ ! Одно победное место, 3 дня игор😀
custom 52651255211166347023
2 и 5 место- писать flancy ( @ssweiq )
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Por Flavor (@Wnksao) 2. #美しい死()%nara@ (@Naracka67) 3. margoxwy (@margxxa) 4. 我 (@kw3ently) 5. ᴀcᴅғ (@WikipediaO0) 6. 𓆩 𝑨𝒍𝒂𝒚𝒓𝒆𝒏 𝑭𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒕 𓆪 (@Veinmind) 7. ⋆˙𝓐𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓮⋆˙⟡ (@akane_aoii) 8. @чокооо``(*･ω･*)~~ (@Kapessm) 9. •♱𝕭𝖀𝕿𝕿𝕰𝕽𝕮𝖀𝕻♱• (@BUTTERCUP_w) 10. 【˚✧♡ 𝓔𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓢𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓻 ♡✧˚】 (@Eternal_Sugar0) ✔️Проверить результаты
custom 52808491343943067961
По поводу заказа писать- @MissSalva
Владелец уходит на неделю отдыха🤩🪡 -по поводу заказа @MissSalva ; -все сообщения свейджу будут проигнорированы, если они: по поводу заказа, связанно как-нибудь с услугами, вп и тд. ; 😀😀🤩Через неделю заказы будут снова открыты
❌🤩❌🤩LANCY 💭🤩IFE❌🤩 Ка⃞⃞⃞че̸р̸ы в Fℓคnc𐍔 Seꪚvi𝓈ℯ, э𝘵о прⲁⲃдꪋ интересные люди?.. на этом канале🤩 мøжńо бƴдęт следить за их ሦи𝓏𝓃ьდ.. - ЧТО?! ❌❌❌❌❌🌟🌟🌟😀 ❌😀😀 @flancy_service 😀😀 На этом канале вы сможете увидеть повседневную жизнь качеров/интересные рассказы/как копятся гемы на вашем аккаунте. ❌😀😀😀😀❌❌🤩 Пусть наша встреча будет с вами долгой!..
Это розыгрыш на 3000 рублей 😀😀, доверять можно человеку
https://t.me/randombeast_bot/devapp?startapp=invite_PONCQDR76B&startApp=invite_PONCQDR76B
Posted without readable text
Sticker, posted without a caption
😀😀😀😀🔹лавноеℹ️🤩 😀❤️ OWNER — Свейдж 🤩🤩🤩ВЛАДЕЛЕЦ 🤩 только принимает заказы, дальше он ищет качера, и только тогда скажет вам имя и юз качера. Качер никак не может принять заказ без согласования с владельцем😀 ───────➕─────── 😀😀😀ГРАФИК когда владелец принимает заказы: 😀БУДНЫЕ дни: 08:00-22:00 по мск. 😀ВЫХОДНЫЕ дни: 10:00-22:00 по мск. ───────➕─────── 🔽Главная валюта- UAH —принимаем так же рубли, тенге, звёзды, и остальные…
custom 52647762200163856022
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀ДОСКА ПОЧЁТА ➕ или проще, список людей которые помогают каналу/админам. Буст⚡️ @Eternal_Sugar0 » 4 @Snotra_goddess » 1 🤩Звезды ⭐️ @allchemiistt » 25 @ko20q » 10 @kr0Kan7 » 8 @MissSalva » 6 @suwicideclub » 5 @tarelkaoba » 3 @Elliotiko » 2 @LinmfuzAkk » 1 @Namia_175 » 1 🤩Донат 🎁 ➕Перед покупкой доната просим вас сначала написать владельцу то что вы хотите купить донат, дальше говорите кому хотите купи…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @flancy_service. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 255,744 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@flancy_service named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fᥣᥲᥒᥴy service | качеры” (@flancy_service), 400 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flancy_service.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.