Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚍𝚢 ⊘𝚏 𝚏𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚜

@fl0wers_m

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

120subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002113901494
TypeChannel
Username@fl0wers_m
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fl0wers_m

Growth

120123121.57 August 2026 — 123 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123 subscribers14 August 2026 — 120 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:04120-3
9 Aug 2026, 03:17123no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:20123first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
107.6%
avg views ÷ 120 subscribers
Avg views / post
129
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
35.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held18 (10 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,936
Reactions total289
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

364 reactions across 6 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52422230375074627295013.7%
custom 5267375113317157463277.42%
custom 5195416153203186732267.14%
custom 5458421336021945527246.59%
custom 5208613226199156361195.22%
custom 5226943644107307706164.40%
custom 5240123807817029115164.40%
custom 5246712807340142144164.40%
custom 5375340991886697832164.40%
custom 5235914207291014691154.12%
custom 5231317613031754501143.85%
custom 5321443558958340435143.85%
custom 5363873497925852669133.57%
custom 539322953067453240792.47%
custom 524495290583590158482.20%
custom 524255379293893108071.92%
custom 522673415707744856961.65%
custom 526727641496869426761.65%
custom 541350498465220821661.65%
custom 543160150723135803961.65%
10 further kinds5013.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 364reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fl0wers_m. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC146 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Buttt if y💭u cry, 1'll be there for you 📑 trust me (!!!) #𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚍𝚢0𝚏𝚏𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚜

custom 51954161532031867327custom 52086132261991563617custom 52267341570774485696custom 52673751133171574636

Signed @me..zZz!

2 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC66 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

☆ミ I need 4 minutes ¡ ໒꒱ to surprise U💛 ⊰⁠⊹ฺ 🌟 лучший эстет Channel во главе с самой крутой соло исполнительницей - Choi Yena * 🌟《 множество различных эстетов не только с йеной, but самая важная информация про йену too * 」 — nct , izone , idntt ♪⁠~ yena . . & more — ✷ me :: nasya / kiwi ヾestj ⋋⁠✿⁠ 29.03 🐚 益⁠ “ bixby , oxxxymiron , martin , baby cute , dora , bushido zho ” ノ⁠♫ 🐚 cdrama ; kdaram ?? - yes shit 。⁠*゚⁠+

custom 53932295306745324079custom 51954161532031867328custom 52673751133171574638custom 52086132261991563617

Signed Флип.Премиум / PremiumFleep

24 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC229 views77 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 524222303750746272917custom 524012380781702911516custom 524671280734014214416custom 52425537929389310807custom 54562245590342962606custom 52266205423075655475custom 52268538535210115315custom 52534532517050697555

Signed @me..zZz!

20 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC132 views77 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩❤️

custom 524222303750746272917custom 537534099188669783216custom 526737511331715746313custom 53638734979258526697custom 54584213360219455277custom 52672764149686942676custom 54135049846522082166custom 52086132261991563615

Signed @me..zZz!

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fl0wers_m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 838,285 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚍𝚢 ⊘𝚏 𝚏𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚜” (@fl0wers_m), 120 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fl0wers_m.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.