Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ФК «Лада» Димитровград

Channel

ФК «Лада» Димитровград

@fkorgenergostroy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

730subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001410864206
TypeChannel
Username@fkorgenergostroy
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fkorgenergostroy

Growth

7307347327 August 2026 — 734 subscribers8 August 2026 — 734 subscribers15 August 2026 — 730 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 729–735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:09730-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:04734no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:10734first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

549 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27750.5%
😭8515.5%
👍549.84%
🔥315.65%
💘193.46%
💔173.10%
🤬173.10%
🤡91.64%
💯81.46%
❤‍🔥71.28%
🥰50.911%
💋40.729%
👏20.364%
😍20.364%
😎20.364%
😢20.364%
10.182%
🆒10.182%
👎10.182%
😨10.182%
4 further kinds40.729%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 549reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2025 to 11 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fkorgenergostroy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 November 2025 to 11 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Apr 2026, 07:52 UTC763 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Напоминаем про новый канал, все новости выкладываем тут https://t.me/fcladadd

3

1 Apr 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,040 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вступаем по ссылкам 🔗 В скоре данный канал будет удален, поэтому успеваем❤️

7

1 Apr 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,190 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Доброй ночи! У нас для вас новость) https://vk.ru/club237287890 https://t.me/fcladadd

4

23 Feb 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,790 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С праздником, мужчины!

17🔥9👍6🥰3🤝1🆒1

28 Jan 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,290 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nezfootPhoto

🏟 «Лада» – самый посещаемый клуб МФС «Приволжье» ...но в следующем сезоне мы вряд ли увидим димитровградскую команду 🫡 В топ-3 также залетели «Ижевск» и «Дорожник», а «Шумбрат» только четвёртый. 📸 тг-канал «Футбольная посещаемость» 😎 незаметный футбол

23👏2👍1

19 Jan 2026, 05:46 UTC≈1,490 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

121

18 Jan 2026, 18:23 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 8 August 2026

Отправить можно в любое время суток!

18 Jan 2026, 18:11 UTC≈1,250 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогие наши болельщики, если у вас есть видео с игр, фотографии или видео с игроками, пожалуйста отправьте в личные сообщения https://t.me/asyaaakkk ! Сделаем видео с фанатами на память ❤️ *игроки, кидайте тоже!

🔥61

13 Jan 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,420 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

💘9👍6👎1

13 Jan 2026, 10:28 UTC≈1,150 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @futizproPhoto

Почему так обидно, что вот такие команды как Оргэнергострой (Лада), не могут позволить себе выступать в КФК, не говоря уж о второй лиге. Почему всем насрать на футбол в регионах? Где вы руководители, которые кричат что мы развиваем спорт?! Где вы чиновники, которые в отчетах каждый год указывают затраты на спорт! Куда вы их затрачиваете? На кого??? Вы убили команду, мечту детей. Академия которая была, вы тоже убили!

36🤬9💯8❤‍🔥7

30 Dec 2025, 05:05 UTC≈1,550 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В этом году и мэр города, и губернатор Ульяновской области обещали поддержку команде, которую команда так и не получила! Говорили, что команда должна жить , какой итог? -Ничего нет Парни играли, зная, что это может быть последняя игра, ездили на своих машинах…

36🤬8😭6💘4👍2🔥2💔1🥰1

29 Dec 2025, 18:57 UTC≈1,660 views74 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Игрокам ФК«Лада»… Вам — наши самые тёплые и самые искренние слова. Вы играли не за гонорары — за идею. Садились за руль, ехали по 6–8 часов за свой счёт — и сразу на поле, 90 минут борьбы. Отпрашивались с работы, пропускали учёбу, не видели семьи по выходным. Но вы выходили. Снова и снова. Потому что верили: «Лада» должна жить. Даже, когда каждая игра могла стать последней. Сейчас, пришло время сказать «прощай». И ос

54👍14💘6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fkorgenergostroy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,334,844 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Годунок, Дмитрий Владимирович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…России|20px}} [[Лада (футбольный клуб, Димитровград)|Лада]][https://t.me/fkorgenergostroy/1118 Годунок Дмитрий Владимирович покидает пост главного…”
read 16 August 2026
Лада (футбольный клуб, Димитровград) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…в связи с финансовыми проблемами{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/fkorgenergostroy/689|title=ФК "ОРГЭНЕРГОСТРОЙ" г. Димитровград официально…”
read 16 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФК «Лада» Димитровград” (@fkorgenergostroy), 730 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fkorgenergostroy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.