Channel
@fizzybesttdm
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
102subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002836711804 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fizzybesttdm |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fizzybesttdm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 102 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 104 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 104 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
38 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 14 | 36.8% | |
| ๐ฅ | 11 | 28.9% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 3 | 7.89% | |
| โก | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ณ | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ๐คทโโ | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ๐คฉ | 1 | 2.63% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐ก๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ด๐ผ๐ผ๐ฑ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐ป ๐ก๐ผ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ ๐บ๐๐๐
โค3
๐พ๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐พ๐ ?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Hey!
โคโ๐ฅ1๐ฅ1๐คฉ1
New One โ๏ธ
โค1๐ฅ1
๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐จ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ก๐ก๐ฎ ๐ค๐ซ๐๐ง. ๐พ๐ค๐ข๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ค๐ข๐ค๐ง๐ง๐ค๐ฌ ๐คฉ
๐2
๐ฆ๐ผ๐น๐ฑ โ๏ธ
๐ฅ3
๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐ก๐ ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ก ๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ง๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐๐
โคโ๐ฅ2๐ฅฐ1
Video, posted without a caption
๐ซช
๐ฅ3
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSHM3cVAX/ NEW POSTโค๏ธ
โค2
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSHdEQmNq/ New Post๐ฅโค๏ธโ๐ฅ
โค2
๐ก๐๐ช ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐ง 8 ๐ฃ๐
โค2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fizzybesttdm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
๐พ๐๐๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐พ๐ ?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 12 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank โ 860,686 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ญ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฃ๐จ๐๐๐ ๐ต๐ฐโ (@fizzybesttdm), 102 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fizzybesttdm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.